15 Alabama opinions name it 1 courts 1920–1980 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McMillan v. Aikengreen2 sentences1929“If, while this policy is in full force and effect and while there is no default in the payment of. premium beyond the four weeks’ grace period, the insured shall lose by severance both hands, or both feet, or one hand and one foot, or lose permanently the sight of both eyes, total and permanent disability will be deemed to exist, and one-half of the amount of insurance then payable in the event of death shall be paid immediately upon receipt by -the Company of due proof of such loss and surrender of this Policy.” Counsel for appellant, contending for reversible error, in refusing the general 1929“If, while this policy is in full force and effect and while there is no default in the payment of. premium beyond the four weeks’ grace period, the insured shall lose by severance both hands, or both feet, or one hand and one foot, or lose permanently the sight of both eyes, total and permanent disability will be deemed to exist, and one-half of the amount of insurance then payable in the event of death shall be paid immediately upon receipt by -the Company of due proof of such loss and surrender of this Policy.” Counsel for appellant, contending for reversible error, in refusing the general | 1 | 7 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gunn v. Palatine Ins. Co., Ltd., of London
neutral
2 sentences1941Co. et al., 217 Ala. 89 , 114 So. 690 , that the defect presented ‘was not a mere question of defect of title, but extent of ownership,’ and that on this question defendants were entitled to the general affirmative instruction. * * * ” The decisions of this court upon the question of whether or not a conditional purchaser of property is a sole and unconditional owner in fee simple within the terms of an insurance policy ^have been with reference to real estate. 1941Co. et al., 217 Ala. 89 , 114 So. 690 , that the defect presented ‘was not a mere question of defect of title, but extent of ownership,’ and that on this question defendants were entitled to the general affirmative instruction. * * * ” The decisions of this court upon the question of whether or not a conditional purchaser of property is a sole and unconditional owner in fee simple within the terms of an insurance policy ^have been with reference to real estate. | 2 | 1930–1941 |
King v. Winslett
neutral
1 sentence1980As was stated in King, supra at 287 Ala. 103 , 248 So.2d 566 : Appellants can take nothing in consequence of an erroneous conclusion inducing the trial court to give the general affirmative instruction for appellee, if appellee was otherwise entitled to such instruction. . . . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Pick-Bay Company v. Younkin
green
1 sentence1980As was stated in King, supra at 287 Ala. 103 , 248 So.2d 566 : Appellants can take nothing in consequence of an erroneous conclusion inducing the trial court to give the general affirmative instruction for appellee, if appellee was otherwise entitled to such instruction. . . . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Burke v. Curtis Aeroplane Motor Co.
neutral
2 sentences1971Burke v. Curtis Aeroplane Motor Co., 204 Ala. 354 , 85 So. 703 . 1971Burke v. Curtis Aeroplane Motor Co., 204 Ala. 354 , 85 So. 703 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Morgan-Hill Paving Co. v. Thomas
neutral
2 sentences1963Morgan-Hill Paving Co. v. Thomas, 223 Ala. 88 , 134 So. 480; and other cases cited in 18-A Ala. Dig., Trial, ‘®=>168. 1963Morgan-Hill Paving Co. v. Thomas, 223 Ala. 88 , 134 So. 480; and other cases cited in 18-A Ala. Dig., Trial, ‘®=>168. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Jones v. Bell
neutral
2 sentences1941Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336 , 77 So. 998 ; McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Poole v. Fletcher, 233 Ala. 54 , 169 So. 868 . 1941Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336 , 77 So. 998 ; McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Poole v. Fletcher, 233 Ala. 54 , 169 So. 868 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Poole v. Fletcher
neutral
2 sentences1941Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336 , 77 So. 998 ; McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Poole v. Fletcher, 233 Ala. 54 , 169 So. 868 . 1941Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336 , 77 So. 998 ; McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Poole v. Fletcher, 233 Ala. 54 , 169 So. 868 . | 1 | 1941–1941 |
Acuff v. Lowe
neutral
1 sentence1933McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Letson v. Mutual Loan Soc., 208 Ala. 285 , 94 So. 288 ; American Mining Co. v. Taylor, 211 Ala. 513 , 100 So. 761, 763 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
America Mining Co. v. Taylor
neutral
1 sentence1933McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Letson v. Mutual Loan Soc., 208 Ala. 285 , 94 So. 288 ; American Mining Co. v. Taylor, 211 Ala. 513 , 100 So. 761, 763 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Letson v. Mutual Loan Soc.
neutral
2 sentences1933McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Letson v. Mutual Loan Soc., 208 Ala. 285 , 94 So. 288 ; American Mining Co. v. Taylor, 211 Ala. 513 , 100 So. 761, 763 . 1933McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35 , 88 So. 135 ; Letson v. Mutual Loan Soc., 208 Ala. 285 , 94 So. 288 ; American Mining Co. v. Taylor, 211 Ala. 513 , 100 So. 761, 763 . | 1 | 1933–1933 |
Allen v. Birmingham Southern R. Co.
neutral
2 sentences1930Co., 210 Ala. 41, 44 , 97 So. 93, 95 , wherein it is said: “These numerous charges on that subject uixduly brought before the jui-y the contributory negligence of the plaintiff; they were calculated to mislead the jury as to whether his contributory negligence was a defense to the only count, which was a wanton one, in the complaint, and we are under those circumstances constrained to hold the court erred in giving them.” The action there was, possibly, predicated upon the repeated and great number (17) of such charges “calculated to mislead the jury as to whether contributory negligence was a 1930Co., 210 Ala. 41, 44 , 97 So. 93, 95 , wherein it is said: “These numerous charges on that subject uixduly brought before the jui-y the contributory negligence of the plaintiff; they were calculated to mislead the jury as to whether his contributory negligence was a defense to the only count, which was a wanton one, in the complaint, and we are under those circumstances constrained to hold the court erred in giving them.” The action there was, possibly, predicated upon the repeated and great number (17) of such charges “calculated to mislead the jury as to whether contributory negligence was a | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Brown v. Sutton
green
1 sentence1929Smith v. Gaines, 210 Ala. 245 , 97 So. 739 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Smith v. Gaines
green
1 sentence1929Smith v. Gaines, 210 Ala. 245 , 97 So. 739 . | 1 | 1929–1929 |
Roberson v. State
green
2 sentences1928Roberson v. State, 217 Ala. 696 , 117 So. 412 . 1928Roberson v. State, 217 Ala. 696 , 117 So. 412 . | 1 | 1928–1928 |
Donahoo Horse & Mule Co. v. Durick
neutral
2 sentences1920Bienville Water Co. v. Mobile, 125 Ala. 178, 184 , 27 South. 781 ; Donahoo Co. v. Durick, 193 Ala. 456, 486 , 69 South. 545 , and cases there cited. 1920Bienville Water Co. v. Mobile, 125 Ala. 178, 184 , 27 South. 781 ; Donahoo Co. v. Durick, 193 Ala. 456, 486 , 69 South. 545 , and cases there cited. | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Bienville Water Supply Co. v. City of Mobile
neutral
1 sentence1920Bienville Water Co. v. Mobile, 125 Ala. 178, 184 , 27 South. 781 ; Donahoo Co. v. Durick, 193 Ala. 456, 486 , 69 South. 545 , and cases there cited. | 1 | 1920–1920 |