15 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. Glennongreen2 sentences2005Accordingly, a “contract made by an unlicensed individual calling for his personal services *** is unenforceable.” Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. Glennon , 32 Ill. 2d 51, 54 (1964); Ransburg , 224 Ill. 2005Accordingly, a “contract made by an unlicensed individual calling for his personal services *** is unenforceable.” Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. Glennon, 32 Ill. 2d 51, 54 (1964); Ransburg, 224 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Ransburg v. Haasegreen2 sentences2005Accordingly, a “contract made by an unlicensed individual calling for his personal services *** is unenforceable.” Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. Glennon , 32 Ill. 2d 51, 54 (1964); Ransburg , 224 Ill. 2005Accordingly, a “contract made by an unlicensed individual calling for his personal services *** is unenforceable.” Pascal P. Paddock, Inc. v. Glennon, 32 Ill. 2d 51, 54 (1964); Ransburg, 224 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Spiller v. Continental Tube Co.green2 sentences2012Id. at 877, 138 Ill.Dec. 105 , 546 N.E.2d 1160 (citing Spiller v. Continental Tube Co., 95 Ill.2d 423, 432 , 69 Ill.Dec. 399 , 447 N.E.2d 834 (1983)). 2012Id. at 877, 138 Ill.Dec. 105 , 546 N.E.2d 1160 (citing Spiller v. Continental Tube Co., 95 Ill.2d 423, 432 , 69 Ill.Dec. 399 , 447 N.E.2d 834 (1983)). | 1 | 2 |
Licciardi v. Collinsgreen2 sentences2003That is, we believe the public policy behind the rule so important that, as long as an attorney’s services are employed with respect to the division of marital property, the rule bars contingent fees therefor.” Licciardi, 180 Ill. 2003That is, we believe the public policy behind the rule so important that, as long as an attorney's services are employed with respect to the division of marital property, the rule bars contingent fees therefor." Licciardi , 180 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
Kaplan v. Tabb Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2000See generally, Restatement (Second) of Contracts § 181 (1981) ("If a party is prohibited from doing an act because of his failure to comply with a licensing, registration or similar requirement, a promise in consideration of his doing that act or his promise to do it is unenforceable on grounds of public policy if (a) the requirement has a regulatory purpose, and (b) the interest in the enforcement of the promise is clearly outweighed by the public policy behind the requirement.") The case of Kaplan v. Tabb Associates, Inc. , 276 Ill. 2000The case of Kaplan v. Tabb Associates, Inc., 276 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
Xco International Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pacific Scientific Company, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellantgreen1 sentence2004Although the public policy behind this rule has never been explained clearly (see XCO International Inc. v. Pacific Scientific Co., 369 F.3d 998, 1001 (7th Cir. 2004) (questioning why courts should bother themselves with determining whether such clauses are reasonable estimates of damages or mere penalties)), under Illinois law, a liquidated damages provision will be enforced if it satisfies the test outlined in section 356 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts: “ ‘Damages for breach by either party may be liquidated in the agreement but only at an amount that is reasonable in the light of | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Aste v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
green
2 sentences2011The court in Aste , quoting section 181 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, noted that "`[i]f a party is prohibited from doing an act because of his failure to comply with a licensing, registration or similar requirement, a promise in consideration of his doing that act or his promise to do it is unenforceable on grounds of public policy if (a) the requirement has a regulatory purpose, and (b) the interest in the enforcement of the promise is clearly outweighed by the public policy behind the requirement.'" Aste, 312 Ill.App.3d at 980 , 245 Ill.Dec. 547 , 728 N.E.2d 629 (quoting Restatem 2011The court in Aste , quoting section 181 of the Restatement (Second) of Contracts, noted that "`[i]f a party is prohibited from doing an act because of his failure to comply with a licensing, registration or similar requirement, a promise in consideration of his doing that act or his promise to do it is unenforceable on grounds of public policy if (a) the requirement has a regulatory purpose, and (b) the interest in the enforcement of the promise is clearly outweighed by the public policy behind the requirement.'" Aste, 312 Ill.App.3d at 980 , 245 Ill.Dec. 547 , 728 N.E.2d 629 (quoting Restatem | 2 | 2011–2011 |
Hawkins v. Chicago Comm'n on Human Relations
neutral
1 sentence2024The public policy behind this rule is to “prevent unfair surprise to [a] plaintiff at trial.” Hawkins v. Chicago Comm’n on Human Relations, 2020 IL App (1st) 191301, ¶27 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Fried v. Polk Brothers, Inc.
green
2 sentences2012Id. at 877, 138 Ill.Dec. 105 , 546 N.E.2d 1160 (citing Spiller v. Continental Tube Co., 95 Ill.2d 423, 432 , 69 Ill.Dec. 399 , 447 N.E.2d 834 (1983)). 2012Id. at 877, 138 Ill.Dec. 105 , 546 N.E.2d 1160 (citing Spiller v. Continental Tube Co., 95 Ill.2d 423, 432 , 69 Ill.Dec. 399 , 447 N.E.2d 834 (1983)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Kinzer v. City of Chicago
green
1 sentence2012Id. (citing Spiller v. Continental Tube Co., 95 Ill. 2d 423, 432 (1983)). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Chemetco, Inc.
green
1 sentence2004A term fixing unreasonably large liquidated damages is unenforceable on grounds of public policy as a penalty.’ ” Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P. v. Chemetco, Inc., 311 Ill. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
In Re Marriage of Wright
green
2 sentences1992That is, we believe the public policy behind the rule so important that, as long as an attorney’s services are employed with respect to the division of marital property, the rule bars contingent fees therefor whether or not a judgment of dissolution has or has not been entered when the attorney is retained.” In re Marriage of Wright (1982), 89 Ill. 2d 498 , 434 N.E.2d 293 , contains the following dictum: “Fisher and our subsequently adopted rule precluding contingent-fee contracts in dissolution actions leave not the slightest doubt of their invalidity when so employed. 1992That is, we believe the public policy behind the rule so important that, as long as an attorney’s services are employed with respect to the division of marital property, the rule bars contingent fees therefor whether or not a judgment of dissolution has or has not been entered when the attorney is retained.” In re Marriage of Wright (1982), 89 Ill. 2d 498 , 434 N.E.2d 293 , contains the following dictum: “Fisher and our subsequently adopted rule precluding contingent-fee contracts in dissolution actions leave not the slightest doubt of their invalidity when so employed. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Stallman v. Youngquist
green
1 sentence1990(Stallman v. Youngquist (1988), 125 Ill. 2d 267 .) The public policy behind the doctrine is the avoidance of disrupting a harmonious family relationship, the avoidance of collusive claims, and the undermining of parental authority and discipline. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Chamness v. Fairtrace
neutral
1 sentence1990Chamness v. Fairtrace (1987), 158 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Schenk v. Schenk
green
1 sentence1985Schenk v. Schenk (1968), 100 Ill. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Larson v. Buschkamp
green
1 sentence1985App. 3d 965, 968 , 435 N.E.2d 221, 224 .) The public policy behind the doctrine was to maintain family harmony, to avoid litigation and strife, and to insure a proper atmosphere of cooperation, discipline, and understanding in the family. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.