15 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Banksgreen2 sentences2007In People v. Banks, 192 Ill. 2007In People v. Banks, 192 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2013Johnson, 406 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Williams
green
2 sentences2009Accepting defendant’s contentions as true in this case would require each and every individual involved in the testing and analysis of DNA to testify at trial, a proposition this court explicitly rejected in Williams, 385 Ill. 2009Accepting defendant’s contentions as true in this case would require each and every individual involved in the testing and analysis of DNA to testify at trial, a proposition this court explicitly rejected in Williams, 385 Ill. | 4 | 2009–2010 |
People v. Savory
green
2 sentences2000Savory , 309 Ill. 2000Savory, 309 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
People v. Charleston
green
1 sentence2024Id. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Crawford v. Washington
green
1 sentence2013At trial, defendant argued Martin’s testimony violated his right of confrontation as provided for in Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), on the basis that two other analysts, Laura Shibert and Jen Belena, also completed some of the DNA analysis. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
White v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1998Rather, the defendant focuses on such cases as White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 , 116 L. 1998Rather, the defendant focuses on such cases as White v. Illinois, 502 U.S. 346 , 116 L. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Bell v. Wolfish
green
1 sentence1992Ed. 2d 447 , 99 S. Ct. 1861 (pretrial detainee’s body cavities).) Under section 5 — 5—3(g), the testing requirement is triggered only upon a person’s conviction for one of the offenses specified in the statute. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Woods v. White
green
1 sentence1991Wis. 1988), 689 F. Supp. 874 .) However, we find that the testing requirement of section 5 — 5—3(h) directly addresses the public health concerns surrounding the spread of HIV among intravenous drug users. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Frazier
green
1 sentence1985(People v. Frazier (1984), 123 Ill. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.