15 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Diaz v. Washington State Migrant Councilgreen1 sentence2023See Diaz, 165 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences2010See In re Welfare of Martin, 3 Wash.App. 405, 411-12 , 476 P.2d 134 (1970). [2] Vandermeer testified that Renfro had been drinking and forced her to have sexual intercourse with him. [3] The court also found T.V. dependent as to Renfro, who did not respond to the dependency petition. [4] During the dependency, B.R. and T.V. were placed in multiple foster homes. [5] The termination petition as to T.V. is not in the record. [6] We granted the motion of Legal Voice to file an amicus brief in this case. 2010See In re Welfare of Martin, 3 Wash.App. 405, 411-12 , 476 P.2d 134 (1970). [2] Vandermeer testified that Renfro had been drinking and forced her to have sexual intercourse with him. [3] The court also found T.V. dependent as to Renfro, who did not respond to the dependency petition. [4] During the dependency, B.R. and T.V. were placed in multiple foster homes. [5] The termination petition as to T.V. is not in the record. [6] We granted the motion of Legal Voice to file an amicus brief in this case. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Costanich v. Department of Social & Health Services
green
2 sentences2008Costanich, 138 Wn. 2008Costanich, 138 Wn. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Johnson v. Department of Social & Health Services
green
2 sentences2002Johnson, 80 Wn. 2002Johnson, 80 Wash.App. at 226-27 , 907 P.2d 1223 . | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Failor's Pharmacy v. Department of Social & Health Services
green
2 sentences2001Rates were to be calculated on the basis of “ XI) actual or estimated cost for pharmacies to acquire drug ingredients, and (2) a dispensing fee.’ ” McGee, 142 Wn.2d at 322 (quoting Failor’s Pharmacy, 125 Wn.2d at 491 ). 2001Rates were to be calculated on the basis of “ XI) actual or estimated cost for pharmacies to acquire drug ingredients, and (2) a dispensing fee.’ ” McGee, 142 Wn.2d at 322 (quoting Failor’s Pharmacy, 125 Wn.2d at 491 ). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
McGee Guest Home, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health Services
green
2 sentences2001Rates were to be calculated on the basis of “ XI) actual or estimated cost for pharmacies to acquire drug ingredients, and (2) a dispensing fee.’ ” McGee, 142 Wn.2d at 322 (quoting Failor’s Pharmacy, 125 Wn.2d at 491 ). 2001Rates were to be calculated on the basis of “ XI) actual or estimated cost for pharmacies to acquire drug ingredients, and (2) a dispensing fee.’ ” McGee, 142 Wn.2d at 322 (quoting Failor’s Pharmacy, 125 Wn.2d at 491 ). | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Trueblood ex rel. Badayos v. Washington State Department of Social & Health Services
green
1 sentence2025Trueblood, 822 F.3d at 1039-40 . 7 No. 87697-0-I/8 court stated that DSHS has “failed to satisfy the Court’s mandate, [has] failed to meet the goals [it] laid out in [its] long-term plan, and [has] failed to meaningfully improve the lives of class members, who continue to languish in jail while waiting for services.” Id. at *1, *4. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In re the Detention of Petersen
green
1 sentence2021Rafford cites In re Detention of Peterson, 138 Wn.2d 70 , 980 P.2d 1204 (1999), for the proposition that “subsequent orders related to the underlying commitment are generally reviewable only under RAP 2.3.” Peterson relies heavily on In re Dependency of Chubb, where the court held that the language of RAP 2.2(a) and the statute governing dependency review hearings “indicate[ ] that appeal by right applies only to disposition decision following the finding of 7 No. 81416-8-I/8 dependency or to a marked change in the status quo, which in effect amounts to a new disposition.” 112 Wn.2d 719, 724-2 | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In Re Detention of Petersen
green
1 sentence2021Rafford cites In re Detention of Peterson, 138 Wn.2d 70 , 980 P.2d 1204 (1999), for the proposition that “subsequent orders related to the underlying commitment are generally reviewable only under RAP 2.3.” Peterson relies heavily on In re Dependency of Chubb, where the court held that the language of RAP 2.2(a) and the statute governing dependency review hearings “indicate[ ] that appeal by right applies only to disposition decision following the finding of 7 No. 81416-8-I/8 dependency or to a marked change in the status quo, which in effect amounts to a new disposition.” 112 Wn.2d 719, 724-2 | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Department of Social & Health Services v. Chubb
green
2 sentences2021Rafford cites In re Detention of Peterson, 138 Wn.2d 70 , 980 P.2d 1204 (1999), for the proposition that “subsequent orders related to the underlying commitment are generally reviewable only under RAP 2.3.” Peterson relies heavily on In re Dependency of Chubb, where the court held that the language of RAP 2.2(a) and the statute governing dependency review hearings “indicate[ ] that appeal by right applies only to disposition decision following the finding of 7 No. 81416-8-I/8 dependency or to a marked change in the status quo, which in effect amounts to a new disposition.” 112 Wn.2d 719, 724-2 2021Rafford cites In re Detention of Peterson, 138 Wn.2d 70 , 980 P.2d 1204 (1999), for the proposition that “subsequent orders related to the underlying commitment are generally reviewable only under RAP 2.3.” Peterson relies heavily on In re Dependency of Chubb, where the court held that the language of RAP 2.2(a) and the statute governing dependency review hearings “indicate[ ] that appeal by right applies only to disposition decision following the finding of 7 No. 81416-8-I/8 dependency or to a marked change in the status quo, which in effect amounts to a new disposition.” 112 Wn.2d 719, 724-2 | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Scrivener v. Clark College
green
1 sentence2017Scrivener, 181 Wn.2d at 445-46 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Sheikh v. Choe
green
1 sentence2014“The standard on a motion for judgment as a matter of law mirrors that of summary judgment.” Aba Sheikh v. Choe, 156 Wn.2d 441, 447 , 128 P.3d 574 (2006). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Aba Sheikh v. Choe
green
1 sentence2014“The standard on a motion for judgment as a matter of law mirrors that of summary judgment.” Aba Sheikh v. Choe, 156 Wn.2d 441, 447 , 128 P.3d 574 (2006). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Badgett v. Security State Bank
green
2 sentences2014State Bank, 116 Wn.2d 563, 569 , 807 P.2d 356 (1991). 2014State Bank, 116 Wn.2d 563, 569 , 807 P.2d 356 (1991). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
McGowan v. State
green
1 sentence2010In any event, because we hold that PSM cannot show "excusable neglect," an essential element for a CR 60(b)(1) motion to vacate, we do not address the remaining elements. [10] CR 60(b)'s complete language, as opposed to the sentence fragment on which PSM relies, further supports a rejection of the "reasonable time" language as guidance for "good cause." See McGowan v. State, 148 Wash.2d 278, 288 , 60 P.3d 67 (2002). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
McGowan v. State
green
1 sentence2010In any event, because we hold that PSM cannot show "excusable neglect," an essential element for a CR 60(b)(1) motion to vacate, we do not address the remaining elements. [10] CR 60(b)'s complete language, as opposed to the sentence fragment on which PSM relies, further supports a rejection of the "reasonable time" language as guidance for "good cause." See McGowan v. State, 148 Wash.2d 278, 288 , 60 P.3d 67 (2002). | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Costanich v. DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SERVS.
green
2 sentences2008Costanich, 138 Wash.App. at 554 , 156 P.3d 232 . 2008Costanich, 138 Wash.App. at 554 , 156 P.3d 232 . | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Johnson v. STATE, DEPT. OF S & HS
green
1 sentence2002Johnson, 80 Wash.App. at 226-27 , 907 P.2d 1223 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
McGee Guest Home v. Department of Social and Health Services
green
2 sentences2001Rates were to be calculated on the basis of "`(1) actual or estimated cost for pharmacies to acquire drug ingredients, and (2) a dispensing fee.'" McGee, 142 Wash.2d at 322 , 12 P.3d 144 (quoting Failor's Pharmacy, 125 Wash.2d at 491 , 886 P.2d 147 ). 2001Rates were to be calculated on the basis of "`(1) actual or estimated cost for pharmacies to acquire drug ingredients, and (2) a dispensing fee.'" McGee, 142 Wash.2d at 322 , 12 P.3d 144 (quoting Failor's Pharmacy, 125 Wash.2d at 491 , 886 P.2d 147 ). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Kramarevcky v. Department of Social & Health Services
neutral
2 sentences1993Kramarevcky, 64 Wn. 1993Kramarevcky, 64 Wn. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Anderson v. Morris
green
2 sentences1980This case *140 turns on a definition of what is meant by current need and resources. [1] "AFDC, which was created by 42 U.S.C. §§ 601-10 , is a joint federal-state program involving federal funding and state administration." If a state participates in the program, "then the state system must be consistent with the federal legislation creating the program and the federal rules and regulations implementing it." Anderson v. Morris, 87 Wn.2d 706, 709 , 558 P.2d 155 (1976). [T]he pertinent federal statutory provision is 42 U.S.C. § 602 (a)(7). (a) A State plan for aid and services to needy families 1980This case *140 turns on a definition of what is meant by current need and resources. [1] "AFDC, which was created by 42 U.S.C. §§ 601-10 , is a joint federal-state program involving federal funding and state administration." If a state participates in the program, "then the state system must be consistent with the federal legislation creating the program and the federal rules and regulations implementing it." Anderson v. Morris, 87 Wn.2d 706, 709 , 558 P.2d 155 (1976). [T]he pertinent federal statutory provision is 42 U.S.C. § 602 (a)(7). (a) A State plan for aid and services to needy families | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.