litigant has standing challenge in Arkansas

14 Arkansas opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Ghegan & Ghegan, Inc. v. Weissgreen ark · 1999 · cited in 4 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2004–2019 2 sentences 2019In Ghegan & Ghegan v. Weiss, 338 Ark. 9 , 991 S.W.2d 536 (1999), this court held that a litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the law is unconstitutional as applied to that particular litigant and that the general rule is that in order to have standing, one must have suffered injury or belong to a class that is prejudiced in order. 2019In Ghegan & Ghegan v. Weiss, 338 Ark. 9 , 991 S.W.2d 536 (1999), this court held that a litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the law is unconstitutional as applied to that particular litigant and that the general rule is that in order to have standing, one must have suffered injury or belong to a class that is prejudiced in order.	2	4
Jester v. Stategreen ark · 2006 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017See Jester v. State, 367 Ark. 249, 258 , 239 S.W.3d 484, 491 (2006) (“A litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the law is unconstitutional as applied to that particular litigant.” (quoting Ghegan v. Weiss, 338 Ark. 9, 14-15 , 991 S.W.2d 536, 539 (1999))). 2017See Jester v. State, 367 Ark. 249, 258 , 239 S.W.3d 484, 491 (2006) (“A litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the law is unconstitutional as applied to that particular litigant.” (quoting Ghegan v. Weiss, 338 Ark. 9, 14-15 , 991 S.W.2d 536, 539 (1999))).	1	1
Ross v. Stategreen ark · 2002 · cited in 1 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002See, e.g., Ross v. State, 347 Ark. 334 , 64 S.W.3d 272 (2002). 2002See, e.g., Ross v. State, 347 Ark. 334 , 64 S.W.3d 272 (2002).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
Hamilton v. Hamilton green ark · 1994 2 sentences 2011Gallas v. Alexander, 371 Ark. 106 , 263 S.W.3d 494 (2007) (citing Morrison v. Jennings, 328 Ark. 278 , 943 S.W.2d 559 (1997)); Hamilton v. Hamilton, 317 Ark. 572 , 879 S.W.2d 416 (1994). 2011Gallas v. Alexander, 371 Ark. 106 , 263 S.W.3d 494 (2007) (citing Morrison v. Jennings, 328 Ark. 278 , 943 S.W.2d 559 (1997)); Hamilton v. Hamilton, 317 Ark. 572 , 879 S.W.2d 416 (1994).	6	1999–2011
Morrison v. Jennings green ark · 1997 2 sentences 2011Gallas v. Alexander, 371 Ark. 106 , 263 S.W.3d 494 (2007) (citing Morrison v. Jennings, 328 Ark. 278 , 943 S.W.2d 559 (1997)); Hamilton v. Hamilton, 317 Ark. 572 , 879 S.W.2d 416 (1994). 2011Gallas v. Alexander, 371 Ark. 106 , 263 S.W.3d 494 (2007) (citing Morrison v. Jennings, 328 Ark. 278 , 943 S.W.2d 559 (1997)); Hamilton v. Hamilton, 317 Ark. 572 , 879 S.W.2d 416 (1994).	6	1999–2011
Chapman v. Bevilacqua green ark · 2001 2 sentences 2011Chapman v. Bevilacqua , 344 Ark. 262 , 42 S.W.3d 378 (2001). 2011Chapman v. Bevilacqua , 344 Ark. 262 , 42 S.W.3d 378 (2001).	3	2003–2011
Arkansas Tobacco Control Board v. Sitton green ark · 2004 2 sentences 2015Tobacco Control Bd. v. Sitton, 357 Ark. 357 , 166 S.W.3d 550 (2004) (holding that a litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the law is unconstitutional as applied to that particular litigant). 2015Tobacco Control Bd. v. Sitton, 357 Ark. 357 , 166 S.W.3d 550 (2004) (holding that a litigant has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the law is unconstitutional as applied to that particular litigant).	1	2015–2015
Gallas v. Alexander green ark · 2007 2 sentences 2011Gallas v. Alexander, 371 Ark. 106 , 263 S.W.3d 494 (2007) (citing Morrison v. Jennings, 328 Ark. 278 , 943 S.W.2d 559 (1997)); Hamilton v. Hamilton, 317 Ark. 572 , 879 S.W.2d 416 (1994). 2011Gallas v. Alexander, 371 Ark. 106 , 263 S.W.3d 494 (2007) (citing Morrison v. Jennings, 328 Ark. 278 , 943 S.W.2d 559 (1997)); Hamilton v. Hamilton, 317 Ark. 572 , 879 S.W.2d 416 (1994).	1	2011–2011

Where else courts name it

AR 14 (1999–2019) GA 13 (2007–2023) CT 2 (2022–2022) CO 2 (1990–1990)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check