record for potential error (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

record for potential error in Arkansas

14 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
In re Accelerated Civil Case List green
arkctapp · 1985
2 sentences

2017Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark.

2015App. 2 Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark.

82013–2017
Anders v. California green
scotus · 1967
2 sentences

2017Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders, supra, and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that Baxley’s appeal is wholly without merit.

2015Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders, supra, and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that appellant’s appeal is wholly without merit. 2 Cite as 2015 Ark.

62001–2017
Young v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2017
1 sentence

2017So 1 Cite as 2017 Ark.

12017–2017
Jones v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2015Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to 1 Cite as 2015 Ark.

12015–2015
Clemons v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2015Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders, supra, and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that appellant’s appeal is wholly without merit. 2 Cite as 2015 Ark.

12015–2015
Gammon v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2015Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to 1 Cite as 2015 Ark.

12015–2015
Roe v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2014
1 sentence

2014Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that Roe’s appeal is wholly without 1 Cite as 2014 Ark.

12014–2014
Earls v. State neutral
arkctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2013Therefore, based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders and the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that an appeal of the trial court’s sentencing order would 3 Cite as 2013 Ark.

12013–2013
Campbell v. State green
arkctapp · 2001
1 sentence

2001Campbell v. State, 74 Ark.

12001–2001

Where else courts name it

CA 391 (2009–2026) AR 14 (2001–2017) TX 6 (2003–2015)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check