14 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Meier v. SENECAUT IIIgreen2 sentences2020See Bank of America, N.A. v. Schulte, 843 N.W.2d 876, 884 (Iowa 2014) (“To preserve error on even a properly raised issue on which the district court failed to rule, ‘the party who raised the issue must file a motion requesting a ruling in order to preserve error for appeal.’” (quoting Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002))). 7 certain representations from taking unfair advantage of another when the party making the representations changes its position to the prejudice of the party who relied upon the representations.’” Markey v. Carney, 705 N.W.2d 13, 21 (Iowa 2005) (quoting ABC 2015To preserve error on even a properly raised issue on which the district court failed to rule “the party who raised the issue must file a motion requesting a ruling in order to preserve error for appeal.” Id. | 6 | 10 |
Bank of America, N.A. v. Schultegreen2 sentences2020See Bank of America, N.A. v. Schulte, 843 N.W.2d 876, 884 (Iowa 2014) (“To preserve error on even a properly raised issue on which the district court failed to rule, ‘the party who raised the issue must file a motion requesting a ruling in order to preserve error for appeal.’” (quoting Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002))). 7 certain representations from taking unfair advantage of another when the party making the representations changes its position to the prejudice of the party who relied upon the representations.’” Markey v. Carney, 705 N.W.2d 13, 21 (Iowa 2005) (quoting ABC 2020See Bank of America, N.A. v. Schulte, 843 N.W.2d 876 , 883–84 (Iowa 2014) (holding that to preserve error on even a properly raised issue on which the district court failed to rule, the party who raised the issue must file a motion requesting a ruling in order to preserve error for appeal). | 5 | 5 |
Markey v. Carneygreen1 sentence2020See Bank of America, N.A. v. Schulte, 843 N.W.2d 876, 884 (Iowa 2014) (“To preserve error on even a properly raised issue on which the district court failed to rule, ‘the party who raised the issue must file a motion requesting a ruling in order to preserve error for appeal.’” (quoting Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002))). 7 certain representations from taking unfair advantage of another when the party making the representations changes its position to the prejudice of the party who relied upon the representations.’” Markey v. Carney, 705 N.W.2d 13, 21 (Iowa 2005) (quoting ABC | 1 | 1 |
ABC Disposal Systems, Inc. v. Department of Natural Resourcesgreen1 sentence2020Res., 681 N.W.2d 596, 606 (Iowa 2004)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Iowa District Court for Webster Countygreen1 sentence2017Ct., 801 N.W.2d 513, 543 (Iowa 2011) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Hill v. Fleetguard, Inc.green1 sentence2017See Hill v. Fleetguard, Inc., 705 N.W.2d 665, 670-71 (Iowa 2005). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mulvanygreen1 sentence2014“It is a fundamental doctrine of appellate review that issues must ordinarily be both raised and decided by the district court before we will decide them on appeal.” Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002); see also State v. Mulvany, 600 N.W.2d 291, 293 (Iowa 1999) (“[W]e require error preservation even on consti tutional issues.”)- To preserve error on even a properly raised issue on which the district court failed to rule, “the party who raised the issue must file a motion requesting a ruling in order to preserve error for appeal.” Meier, 641 N.W.2d at 537 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Al-Khattat v. Engineering & Land Surveying Examining Board of the State of Iowa
green
1 sentence2002Al-K hattat, 644 N.W.2d at 22 -23 n. 2; Meier, 641 N.W.2d at 537 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.