safe place doctrine in Kentucky

14 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1912–1939 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Fluehart Collieries Co. v. Elamgreen kyctapp · 1912 · cited in 1 Kentucky opinions naming this issue, 1915–1915	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (34)

Case	Cited	Years
Wallsend Coal & Coke Co v. Shields' Administrator neutral kyctapp · 1914 2 sentences 1922American Milling Co. v. Bell, 146 Ky. 68 , 141 S. W. 1191 ; Wallsend Coal & Coke Co. v. Shields’ Admr., 159 Ky. 644 , 167 S. W. 918 . 1922American Milling Co. v. Bell, 146 Ky. 68 , 141 S. W. 1191 ; Wallsend Coal & Coke Co. v. Shields’ Admr., 159 Ky. 644 , 167 S. W. 918 .	3	1916–1922
Smith's Admr. v. North Jellico Coal Co. green kyctapp · 1908 2 sentences 1935For the latter line of cases, see Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co. v. Beaver’s Adm’r, 151 Ky. 839 , 152 S. W. 965 ; Smith’s Adm’r v. North Jellico Coal Co., 131 Ky. 196 , 114 S. W. 785 , 28 L. 1935For the latter line of cases, see Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co. v. Beaver’s Adm’r, 151 Ky. 839 , 152 S. W. 965 ; Smith’s Adm’r v. North Jellico Coal Co., 131 Ky. 196 , 114 S. W. 785 , 28 L.	2	1916–1935
Proctor Coal Co. v. Beaver's Admr. neutral kyctapp · 1913 2 sentences 1935For the latter line of cases, see Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co. v. Beaver’s Adm’r, 151 Ky. 839 , 152 S. W. 965 ; Smith’s Adm’r v. North Jellico Coal Co., 131 Ky. 196 , 114 S. W. 785 , 28 L. 1935For the latter line of cases, see Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co. v. Beaver’s Adm’r, 151 Ky. 839 , 152 S. W. 965 ; Smith’s Adm’r v. North Jellico Coal Co., 131 Ky. 196 , 114 S. W. 785 , 28 L.	2	1931–1935
Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co. neutral kyctapp · 1911 2 sentences 1931Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co., 141 Ky. 789 , 133 S. W. 777 ; Atlas Stone Co. v. Ingram, 193 Ky. 272 , 235 S. W. 721 ; Proctor Coal Co. v. Beaver, 151 Ky. 839 , 152 S. W. 965 ; Wight v. Cumberland T. & T. 1912The master should not in reason be required to make the places safe for those he has employed to put them in a safe condition.” In Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co., 141 Ky., 787 , the court after quoting the above, added: “The reason for this rule is perfectly apparent.	2	1912–1931
American Milling Co. v. Bell neutral kyctapp · 1912 2 sentences 1922Louisville Water Co. v. Darnell, 189 Ky. 225 , 225 S. W. 1057 ; American Milling Co. v. Bell, 146 Ky. 68 , 141 S. W. 1191 . 1922Louisville Water Co. v. Darnell, 189 Ky. 225 , 225 S. W. 1057 ; American Milling Co. v. Bell, 146 Ky. 68 , 141 S. W. 1191 .	2	1922–1922
Yeary's Administrator v. Hignite Coal Co. neutral kyctapphigh · 1937 2 sentences 1939Yeary’s Adm’r v. Hignite Coal Company, 267 Ky. 265 , 102 S. W. (2d) 19 . 1939Yeary’s Adm’r v. Hignite Coal Company, 267 Ky. 265 , 102 S. W. (2d) 19 .	1	1939–1939
Mocabee v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co. neutral kyctapp · 1922 2 sentences 1937Mocabee v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co., 194 Ky. 723 , 240 S. W. 380 . 1937Mocabee v. Harbison-Walker Refractories Co., 194 Ky. 723 , 240 S. W. 380 .	1	1937–1937
Duvin Coal Company v. Fike neutral kyctapphigh · 1931 1 sentence 1935West Ky. Coal Co. v. Shoulders’ Adm’r, 234 Ky. 427 , 28 S. W. (2d) 479 ; Gatliff Coal Co. v. Sumner, 196 Ky. 592 , 245 S. W., 144 ; Duvin Coal Co. v. Fike, supra. The proven facts herein distinguish it from those where a danger which encompasses the servant and which was created by him in the necessary progress of the work in which he was engaged at the time of his injury, then the safe place doctrine has no application.	1	1935–1935
West Kentucky Coal Co. v. Shoulders' Administrator green kyctapphigh · 1930 2 sentences 1935West Ky. Coal Co. v. Shoulders’ Adm’r, 234 Ky. 427 , 28 S. W. (2d) 479 ; Gatliff Coal Co. v. Sumner, 196 Ky. 592 , 245 S. W., 144 ; Duvin Coal Co. v. Fike, supra. The proven facts herein distinguish it from those where a danger which encompasses the servant and which was created by him in the necessary progress of the work in which he was engaged at the time of his injury, then the safe place doctrine has no application. 1935West Ky. Coal Co. v. Shoulders’ Adm’r, 234 Ky. 427 , 28 S. W. (2d) 479 ; Gatliff Coal Co. v. Sumner, 196 Ky. 592 , 245 S. W., 144 ; Duvin Coal Co. v. Fike, supra. The proven facts herein distinguish it from those where a danger which encompasses the servant and which was created by him in the necessary progress of the work in which he was engaged at the time of his injury, then the safe place doctrine has no application.	1	1935–1935
Gatliff Coal Co. v. Sumner neutral kyctapp · 1922 2 sentences 1935West Ky. Coal Co. v. Shoulders’ Adm’r, 234 Ky. 427 , 28 S. W. (2d) 479 ; Gatliff Coal Co. v. Sumner, 196 Ky. 592 , 245 S. W., 144 ; Duvin Coal Co. v. Fike, supra. The proven facts herein distinguish it from those where a danger which encompasses the servant and which was created by him in the necessary progress of the work in which he was engaged at the time of his injury, then the safe place doctrine has no application. 1935West Ky. Coal Co. v. Shoulders’ Adm’r, 234 Ky. 427 , 28 S. W. (2d) 479 ; Gatliff Coal Co. v. Sumner, 196 Ky. 592 , 245 S. W., 144 ; Duvin Coal Co. v. Fike, supra. The proven facts herein distinguish it from those where a danger which encompasses the servant and which was created by him in the necessary progress of the work in which he was engaged at the time of his injury, then the safe place doctrine has no application.	1	1935–1935
Boisvert v. Ward green mass · 1908 2 sentences 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St. 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St.	1	1932–1932
Walker v. Ginsburg green mich · 1928 2 sentences 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St. 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St.	1	1932–1932
McParland v. Stewart neutral mich · 1928 2 sentences 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St. 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St.	1	1932–1932
Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Co. neutral pa · 1917 2 sentences 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St. 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St.	1	1932–1932
Rumbley v. Southern Railway Co. neutral · 1910 2 sentences 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St. 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St.	1	1932–1932
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Hoffman green · 1909 2 sentences 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St. 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St.	1	1932–1932
Walaszewski v. Schoknecht neutral wis · 1906 2 sentences 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St. 1932Some of the cases from other jurisdictions in which the doctrine is thus broadly stated are: McParland v. Stewart, 244 Mich. 565 , 222 N. W. 191 ; Walker v. Ginsburg, 244 Mich. 568 , 222 N. W. 192 ; Boisvert v. Ward, 199 Mass. 594 , 85 N. E. 849 ; Walaszewski v. Schoknecht, 127 Wis. 376 , 106 N. W. 1070 ; Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company v. Hoffman, 109 Va. 44 , 63 S. E. 432 ; Rumbley v. Southern Railway Company, 153 N. C. 457 , 69 S. E. 416 ; Hanley v. Carnegie Steel Company, 256 Pa. 44 , 100 A. 543 ; St.	1	1932–1932
Ballard & Ballard Co. v. Lee's Admr. neutral kyctapp · 1909 2 sentences 1932In Ballard & Ballard Company. v. Lee’s Administrator, 131 Ky. 412 , 115 S. W. 732, 735 , Lee was one of the workmen employed by Ballard & Ballard Company to remove the roof from a building preparatory to enlarging the building. 1932In Ballard & Ballard Company. v. Lee’s Administrator, 131 Ky. 412 , 115 S. W. 732, 735 , Lee was one of the workmen employed by Ballard & Ballard Company to remove the roof from a building preparatory to enlarging the building.	1	1932–1932
Stephens v. Kitchen Lumber Company neutral kyctapphigh · 1928 2 sentences 1931Whether, ,if Bailey’s work had required him to be at the foot of the incline, the evidence would have been sufficient to take the case to the jury, in view of the rule that, as between master and servant, there must be other evidence of the master’s negligence in addition to the happening of the accident, Stephens v. Kitchen Lumber Co., 222 Ky. 736 , 2 S. W. (2d) 374 , we deem it unnecessary to determine. 220 The case, not arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, turns on whether Bailey’s situation was such that the safe place doctrine applied. 1931Whether, ,if Bailey’s work had required him to be at the foot of the incline, the evidence would have been sufficient to take the case to the jury, in view of the rule that, as between master and servant, there must be other evidence of the master’s negligence in addition to the happening of the accident, Stephens v. Kitchen Lumber Co., 222 Ky. 736 , 2 S. W. (2d) 374 , we deem it unnecessary to determine. 220 The case, not arising under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, turns on whether Bailey’s situation was such that the safe place doctrine applied.	1	1931–1931
Faulkner v. Gatliff Coal Company neutral kyctapphigh · 1929 2 sentences 1931Faulkner v. Gatliff Coal Co., 228 Ky. 379 , 15 S. W. (2d) 236 ; Shadoan’s Adm’r v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. 1931Faulkner v. Gatliff Coal Co., 228 Ky. 379 , 15 S. W. (2d) 236 ; Shadoan’s Adm’r v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T.	1	1931–1931
Atlas Stone Co. v. Ingram neutral kyctapp · 1921 2 sentences 1931Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co., 141 Ky. 789 , 133 S. W. 777 ; Atlas Stone Co. v. Ingram, 193 Ky. 272 , 235 S. W. 721 ; Proctor Coal Co. v. Beaver, 151 Ky. 839 , 152 S. W. 965 ; Wight v. Cumberland T. & T. 1931Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co., 141 Ky. 789 , 133 S. W. 777 ; Atlas Stone Co. v. Ingram, 193 Ky. 272 , 235 S. W. 721 ; Proctor Coal Co. v. Beaver, 151 Ky. 839 , 152 S. W. 965 ; Wight v. Cumberland T. & T.	1	1931–1931
Ada Coal Co. v. Linville neutral kyctapp · 1913 2 sentences 1924Ada Coal Co. v. Linville. 152 Ky. 2 , 153 S. W. 21 ; Jellico Coal Co. v. Helton, 157 Ky. 610 , 163 S. W. 744 ; Continental Coal Corp. v. York’s Admr., 159 Ky. 334 , 167 S. W. 131 . 1924Ada Coal Co. v. Linville. 152 Ky. 2 , 153 S. W. 21 ; Jellico Coal Co. v. Helton, 157 Ky. 610 , 163 S. W. 744 ; Continental Coal Corp. v. York’s Admr., 159 Ky. 334 , 167 S. W. 131 .	1	1924–1924
Jellico Coal Mining Co. v. Helton neutral kyctapp · 1914 2 sentences 1924Ada Coal Co. v. Linville. 152 Ky. 2 , 153 S. W. 21 ; Jellico Coal Co. v. Helton, 157 Ky. 610 , 163 S. W. 744 ; Continental Coal Corp. v. York’s Admr., 159 Ky. 334 , 167 S. W. 131 . 1924Ada Coal Co. v. Linville. 152 Ky. 2 , 153 S. W. 21 ; Jellico Coal Co. v. Helton, 157 Ky. 610 , 163 S. W. 744 ; Continental Coal Corp. v. York’s Admr., 159 Ky. 334 , 167 S. W. 131 .	1	1924–1924
Continental Coal Corp. v. York's Administrator neutral kyctapp · 1914 2 sentences 1924Ada Coal Co. v. Linville. 152 Ky. 2 , 153 S. W. 21 ; Jellico Coal Co. v. Helton, 157 Ky. 610 , 163 S. W. 744 ; Continental Coal Corp. v. York’s Admr., 159 Ky. 334 , 167 S. W. 131 . 1924Ada Coal Co. v. Linville. 152 Ky. 2 , 153 S. W. 21 ; Jellico Coal Co. v. Helton, 157 Ky. 610 , 163 S. W. 744 ; Continental Coal Corp. v. York’s Admr., 159 Ky. 334 , 167 S. W. 131 .	1	1924–1924
Board of Education v. Scott green kyctapp · 1920 1 sentence 1922Louisville Water Co. v. Darnell, 189 Ky. 225 , 225 S. W. 1057 ; American Milling Co. v. Bell, 146 Ky. 68 , 141 S. W. 1191 .	1	1922–1922
Louisville Water Co. v. Darnell neutral kyctapp · 1920 1 sentence 1922Louisville Water Co. v. Darnell, 189 Ky. 225 , 225 S. W. 1057 ; American Milling Co. v. Bell, 146 Ky. 68 , 141 S. W. 1191 .	1	1922–1922
Wilson v. Chess & Wymond Co. neutral · 1904 1 sentence 1917The duty of the master to furnish a reasonably safe place to his employes is thus stated in Wilson v. Chess & Wymond Co., 117 Ky. 567 : * ‘ The duty of the master to furnish a safe, or reasonably safe, place in which the laborer may do his work, is frequently either misunderstood or misapplied.	1	1917–1917
Eagle Coal Co. v. Patrick's Administrator neutral kyctapp · 1914 2 sentences 1917Carter Coal Co. v. Hill, 166 Ky. 213 , 179 S. W. 2 ; Eagle Coal Company v. Patricks’ Admr., 161 Ky. 333 , 170 S. W. 960 ; Wallsend Coal & Coke Company v. Shields’ Admr., 159 Ky. 644 , 167 S. W. 918 . 1917Carter Coal Co. v. Hill, 166 Ky. 213 , 179 S. W. 2 ; Eagle Coal Company v. Patricks’ Admr., 161 Ky. 333 , 170 S. W. 960 ; Wallsend Coal & Coke Company v. Shields’ Admr., 159 Ky. 644 , 167 S. W. 918 .	1	1917–1917
Carter Coal Co. v. Hill neutral kyctapp · 1915 2 sentences 1917Carter Coal Co. v. Hill, 166 Ky. 213 , 179 S. W. 2 ; Eagle Coal Company v. Patricks’ Admr., 161 Ky. 333 , 170 S. W. 960 ; Wallsend Coal & Coke Company v. Shields’ Admr., 159 Ky. 644 , 167 S. W. 918 . 1917Carter Coal Co. v. Hill, 166 Ky. 213 , 179 S. W. 2 ; Eagle Coal Company v. Patricks’ Admr., 161 Ky. 333 , 170 S. W. 960 ; Wallsend Coal & Coke Company v. Shields’ Admr., 159 Ky. 644 , 167 S. W. 918 .	1	1917–1917
Big Hill Coal Co. v. Abney's Admr. neutral · 1907	1	1916–1916
Stratton v. Northeast Coal Co. neutral kyctapp · 1915 1 sentence 1916Big Hill Coal Co. v. Abney’s Admr., 125 Ky., 355 ; Smith’s Admr. v. North Jellico Coal Co., 131 Ky., 196 ; Stratton v. Northeast Coal Co., 164 Ky., 299 ; Wallsend Coal & Coke Co. v. Shield’s Admr., 159 Ky., 644 ; and there being no evidence tending to show that the company failed or refused to furnish props after the decedent had selected and marked the same, we conclude that the trial court should have directed a verdict in favor of the company.	1	1916–1916
Broadway Coal Mining Co. v. Robinson neutral · 1912	1	1915–1915
Jellico Coal Mining Co. v. Woods neutral kyctapp · 1913	1	1915–1915
Bell v. Commonwealth neutral kyctapp · 1913	1	1915–1915

Where else courts name it

WI 21 (1912–2025) KY 14 (1912–1939) MI 8 (1895–1965) WA 4 (1910–2017) TX 3 (1919–1929) NY 3 (1913–1937) CO 2 (1904–1909) VT 2 (1908–1917)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check