three assignments error in Louisiana

14 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Razor v. New Orleans Depatment of Policegreen lactapp · 2006 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 1 sentence 2019See Razor v. New Orleans Dep’t of Police, 2004-2002, pp. 5-6 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2/15/06), 926 So.2d 1, 5 . 9 The following three assignments of error are listed in Sgt.	1	1
In re Segalgreen la · 2017 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017Donahue v. Donahue, 16-1863 (La. 11/18/16), 206 So.3d 868, 858-59 (per curiam). lain accordance with—and pursuant to— the order of the Louisiana Supreme Court vacating our holding in Donahue I and remanding the case to this court for consideration of the merits of the appeal, we now turn to address the three assignments of error raised by Ms. Donahue.	1	1
Rosell v. Escogreen la · 1989 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990 1 sentence 1990The standard for review in such matters is clearly set out in Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840, 844 (La.1989) as follows: It is well settled that a court of appeal may not set aside a trial court's or a jury’s finding of fact in the absence of “manifest error” or unless it is “clearly wrong,” and where there is conflict in the testimony, reasonable evaluations of credibility and reasonable inferences of fact should not be disturbed upon review, even though the appellate court may feel that its own evaluations and inferences are as reasonable.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

Case	Cited	Years
Doane v. Wal-Mart Discount Stores, Inc. green lactapp · 1997 2 sentences 2020App. 4 Cir. 6/25/97), 697 So.2d 309 . 9 On appeal, Ms. Cutrone asserts the following three assignments of error: 1. 2020App. 4 Cir. 6/25/97), 697 So.2d 309 . 9 On appeal, Ms. Cutrone asserts the following three assignments of error: 1.	2	2020–2020
Carradine v. Regis Corp. green lactapp · 2010 1 sentence 2014In Carradine v. Regis Corp., 10-529, p. 11 (La.App. 3 Cir. 11/3/10), 52 So.3d 181, 190 , we stated that La.Code Civ.P. art. 2133(A) has been interpreted, jurispruden-tially, to mean “that an answer to an appeal only operates as an appeal from those aspects of the judgment about which the answer complains.” Comparing LUBA’s answer to the language of the three assignments of error at issue, we agree with Rebel Distributors/Physician Partner’s argument that LUBA’s answer to the appeal fails to address the issues raised in its fifth, seventh, and eighth assignments of error.	1	2014–2014
Ardoin v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C. green la · 2011 1 sentence 2011If not otherwise eliminated, a claimant is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for ‘“personal injury by accident arising out of and in the course of his employment.’ ” Ardoin v. Firestone Polymers, L.L.C., 10-0245, p. 5 (La.1/19/11), 56 So.3d 215, 218 , quoting La.R.S. 23:1031(A).	1	2011–2011
Syrie v. Schilhab green la · 1997 1 sentence 2000Syrie v. Schilhab, 96-1027 (La.5/20/97); 693 So.2d 1173 . *770 ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR On appeal, Plaintiff-Appellant seeks reversal of the trial court's decision based on the following three assignments of error: 1.	1	2000–2000
State v. Prieur red la · 1973 1 sentence 1988The trial court erred in denying a mistrial when the prosecutor mentioned a [ State v. ] Prieur [ 277 So.2d 126 (La. 1973) ] incident in his opening statement, and told the jury that they would see the similarities between the Prieur incident and the instant offenses, "as Judge Quinlan ruled." 2.	1	1988–1988
State v. Perkins green la · 1982 1 sentence 1987State v. Perkins, supra; State v. Buras, supra. Finding merit in this assignment of error, we decline to address the remaining three assignments of error.	1	1987–1987
State v. Buras neutral lactapp · 1984 1 sentence 1987State v. Perkins, supra; State v. Buras, supra. Finding merit in this assignment of error, we decline to address the remaining three assignments of error.	1	1987–1987
Cassidy v. Cassidy green la · 1985 1 sentence 1985Cassidy v. Cassidy, 477 So.2d 84 (La.1985) for a different rule as concerns alimony pendente lite which must continue until final judgment on appeal.	1	1985–1985
State v. Bosworth green la · 1979 1 sentence 1982The decree, although not pronouncing affirmation of the conviction, reversed only the sentence and remanded only for resentencing. 373 So.2d at 155 .	1	1982–1982
State v. Carthan green la · 1979 1 sentence 1980Cf., State v. Carthan, 377 So.2d 308 (La.1979).	1	1980–1980
State v. Lee green la · 1976 1 sentence 1977The three assignments of error relied on by the present defendant were rejected in the prior appeal of the co-defendant, State v. Lee, supra. The conviction and sentence are affirmed.	1	1977–1977

Where else courts name it

OH 134 (1978–2026) LA 14 (1977–2020) VA 5 (2005–2022) MS 4 (1967–2007) OR 4 (2010–2024) OK 3 (1923–1976) FL 2 (1909–1946) WV 2 (1942–1962) KS 2 (1936–1963) AL 2 (1963–1970) NC 2 (1975–1985) CT 2 (1924–1972)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check