14 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1979–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Millergreen2 sentences1983See People v *259 Miller, 406 Mich 244 ; 277 NW2d 630 (1979), where the Chamblis rule was modified to allow such a misdemeanor instruction. 1983See People v *259 Miller, 406 Mich 244 ; 277 NW2d 630 (1979), where the Chamblis rule was modified to allow such a misdemeanor instruction. | 2 | 6 |
People v. Van Wyckgreen2 sentences1980In People v Van Wyck (On Remand), 83 Mich App 581, 583, 582; 269 NW2d 233 (1978), this Court noted tersely: "While the record does not conclusively establish mitigating circumstances, it does not clearly establish a lack of passion”, and "The record contains slight but sufficient evidence to present a jury question.” The factual situation in People v West, supra, is also illustrative. 1980In People v Van Wyck (On Remand), 83 Mich App 581, 583, 582; 269 NW2d 233 (1978), this Court noted tersely: "While the record does not conclusively establish mitigating circumstances, it does not clearly establish a lack of passion”, and "The record contains slight but sufficient evidence to present a jury question.” The factual situation in People v West, supra, is also illustrative. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Chamblis
green
2 sentences2002The reluctance is born of the foreseeably lengthened "laundry list" of offenses and jurors who would be required to absorb possibly dozens of pages of instructions regarding the many offenses possible under the "cognate", "related" or "allied" offense theory of Jones . [ Id., at 431 , 236 N.W.2d 473 .] In People v. Stephens, 416 Mich. 252, 255 , 330 N.W.2d 675 (1982), this Court overruled the misdemeanor cutoff rule articulated in Chamblis , holding: [T]he policies behind the Chamblis rule would be better served by a more flexible approach to lesser included offense instructions on misdemeanor 2002The reluctance is born of the foreseeably lengthened "laundry list" of offenses and jurors who would be required to absorb possibly dozens of pages of instructions regarding the many offenses possible under the "cognate", "related" or "allied" offense theory of Jones . [ Id., at 431 , 236 N.W.2d 473 .] In People v. Stephens, 416 Mich. 252, 255 , 330 N.W.2d 675 (1982), this Court overruled the misdemeanor cutoff rule articulated in Chamblis , holding: [T]he policies behind the Chamblis rule would be better served by a more flexible approach to lesser included offense instructions on misdemeanor | 4 | 1980–2002 |
People v. Brown
green
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 3 | 1980–1982 |
People v. Stephens
green
2 sentences2002The reluctance is born of the foreseeably lengthened “laundry list” of offenses and jurors who would be required to absorb possibly dozens of pages of instructions regarding the many offenses possible under the “cognate”, “related” or “allied” offense theory of Jones. [Id., 431.] In People v Stephens, 416 Mich 252, 255 ; 330 NW2d 675 (1982), this Court overruled the misdemeanor cutoff rule articulated in Chamblis , holding: [T]he policies behind the Chamblis rule would be better served by a more flexible approach to lesser included offense instmctions on misdemeanors. 2002The reluctance is born of the foreseeably lengthened “laundry list” of offenses and jurors who would be required to absorb possibly dozens of pages of instructions regarding the many offenses possible under the “cognate”, “related” or “allied” offense theory of Jones. [Id., 431.] In People v Stephens, 416 Mich 252, 255 ; 330 NW2d 675 (1982), this Court overruled the misdemeanor cutoff rule articulated in Chamblis , holding: [T]he policies behind the Chamblis rule would be better served by a more flexible approach to lesser included offense instmctions on misdemeanors. | 2 | 1984–2002 |
People v. Pipkin
green
2 sentences1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). 1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). | 2 | 1980–1983 |
People v. Potter
green
2 sentences1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). 1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. Vasher
neutral
2 sentences1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). 1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. Harold Johnson
green
2 sentences1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). 1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. Joeseype Johnson
green
2 sentences1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). 1983We fail to see how a dispute over the value of property can be distinguished from a dispute over the defendant’s assaultive intent, see People v Joeseype Johnson, 407 Mich 196, 274 ; 284 NW2d 718 (1979) (opinion by Levin, J.), or a defendant’s intent with regard to marijuana, see People v Potter, 115 Mich App 125 ; 320 NW2d 313 (1982); People v Vasher, 97 Mich App 372 ; 296 NW2d 30 (1980); or the defendant’s level of intoxication, see People v Harold Johnson, 96 Mich App 652 ; 293 NW2d 664 (1980); People v Pipkin, 93 Mich App 817 ; 287 NW2d 352 (1979). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Estreen v. Bluhm
green
1 sentence1983In this case we are called upon to reconsider the so-called "misdemeanor cutoff’ rule of People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408, 429 ; 236 *255 NW2d 473 (1975). 1 After careful consideration, we conclude that the policies behind the Chamblis rule would be better served by a more flexible approach to lesser included offense instructions on misdemeanors. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. Paul
green
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Mann
green
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Burden
green
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Carter
green
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Jenkins
red
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Henry
green
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Ora Jones
red
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Minier
green
2 sentences1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 1982However, in People v Minier, 100 Mich App 114 ; 299 NW2d 383 (1980), lv den 411 Mich 902 (1981), and People v Brown, 87 Mich App 612 ; 274 NW2d 854 (1978), the Court held that the Chamblis rule did not apply to bench trials. 4 See People v Henry, 395 Mich 367 ; 236 NW2d 489 (1975), People v Ora Jones, 395 Mich 379 ; 236 NW2d 461 (1975), People v Chamblis, 395 Mich 408 ; 236 NW2d 473 (1975), People v Carter, 395 Mich 434 ; 236 NW2d 500 (1975), People v Jenkins, 395 Mich 440 ; 236 NW2d 503 (1975), People v Paul, 395 Mich 444 ; 236 NW2d 486 (1975), People v Burden, 395 Mich 462 ; 236 NW2d 505 (19 | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Escobedo v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1982Affirmed. 4 "4 This is what we meant in Escobedo v Illinois, 378 US 478 ; 84 S Ct 1758 ; 12 L Ed 2d 977 (1964) when we spoke of an investigation which had focused on an accused.” 1982Affirmed. 4 "4 This is what we meant in Escobedo v Illinois, 378 US 478 ; 84 S Ct 1758 ; 12 L Ed 2d 977 (1964) when we spoke of an investigation which had focused on an accused.” | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Hutson v. City of Royal Oak
green
2 sentences1982Hutson v City of Royal Oak, 28 Mich App 393, 395 ; 184 NW2d 558 (1970). 1982Hutson v City of Royal Oak, 28 Mich App 393, 395 ; 184 NW2d 558 (1970). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
People v. Hampton
green
2 sentences1980Therefore, once the Hampton, supra, requirements had been met as to the charge of murder, permitting the jury to consider a lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter must proceed under a Chamblis analysis, and such consideration requires only a modicum of evidence of provocation. 1980Therefore, once the Hampton, supra, requirements had been met as to the charge of murder, permitting the jury to consider a lesser included offense of voluntary manslaughter must proceed under a Chamblis analysis, and such consideration requires only a modicum of evidence of provocation. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. West
green
2 sentences1980In People v Van Wyck (On Remand), 83 Mich App 581, 583, 582; 269 NW2d 233 (1978), this Court noted tersely: "While the record does not conclusively establish mitigating circumstances, it does not clearly establish a lack of passion”, and "The record contains slight but sufficient evidence to present a jury question.” The factual situation in People v West, supra, is also illustrative. 1980In People v Van Wyck (On Remand), 83 Mich App 581, 583, 582; 269 NW2d 233 (1978), this Court noted tersely: "While the record does not conclusively establish mitigating circumstances, it does not clearly establish a lack of passion”, and "The record contains slight but sufficient evidence to present a jury question.” The factual situation in People v West, supra, is also illustrative. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
People v. Lovett
green
2 sentences1979In People v Lovett, 396 Mich 101 ; 238 NW2d 44 (1976), without discussing the retro-activity issue, we found Jones/Chamblis error and reversed a conviction entered prior to our decision *494 in Jones and Chamblis . 1979In People v Lovett, 396 Mich 101 ; 238 NW2d 44 (1976), without discussing the retro-activity issue, we found Jones/Chamblis error and reversed a conviction entered prior to our decision *494 in Jones and Chamblis . | 1 | 1979–1979 |
People v. Ringler
neutral
1 sentence1979See People v Lank Thomas, 399 Mich 826 ; 249 NW2d 867 (1977); People v Bills, 396 Mich 819 ; 238 NW2d 803 (1976); People v Dates, 396 Mich 820 ; 238 NW2d 360 (1976); People v Archie Smith, 396 Mich 825 ; 238 NW2d 536 (1976); People v Aaron, 396 Mich 843 ; 239 NW2d 602 (1976); People v Watson, 396 Mich 870 (1976); People v Delvin Jones, 397 Mich 871 (1976). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.