considers extrinsic factors (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

considers extrinsic factors in New Jersey

14 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1999–2026 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State, Tp. of Pennsauken v. Schadgreen
nj · 1999 · cited in 10 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2000–2025
2 sentences

2025See State, Twp. of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 (1999) ("If [a] text . . . is susceptible to different interpretations, the court considers extrinsic factors, such as the statute's purpose, legislative history, and statutory context to ascertain the legislature's intent.").

2019Where the plain language "is susceptible to different interpretations, the court considers extrinsic factors, such as the statute's purpose, legislative history, and statutory context to ascertain the legislature's intent." Ibid.

310
DiProspero v. Penngreen
nj · 2005 · cited in 2 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2006–2007
2 sentences

2007Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A. 2d 175 (2000) (quoting Twp. of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A. 2d 1159 (1999)); see also DiProspero, supra, 183 N.J. at 492-93 , 874 A. 2d 1039 ; State v. Pena, supra, 178 N.J. at 307-08 , 839 A. 2d 870 . [ Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles, 187 N.J. 197, 206 , 901 A. 2d 303 (2006).] We have summarized our task thusly: "When interpreting a statute or regulation, we endeavor to give meaning to all words and to avoid an interpretation that reduces specific language to mere surplusage." DKM Residential Props.

2007Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A. 2d 175 (2000) (quoting Twp. of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A. 2d 1159 (1999)); see also DiProspero, supra, 183 N.J. at 492-93 , 874 A. 2d 1039 ; State v. Pena, supra, 178 N.J. at 307-08 , 839 A. 2d 870 . [ Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles, 187 N.J. 197, 206 , 901 A. 2d 303 (2006).] We have summarized our task thusly: "When interpreting a statute or regulation, we endeavor to give meaning to all words and to avoid an interpretation that reduces specific language to mere surplusage." DKM Residential Props.

22
Lesniak v. Budzashgreen
nj · 1993 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1999–2026
2 sentences

2026Wingate v. Est. of Ryan, 149 N.J. 227, 236 (1997); Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1, 8 (1993).

2003Wingate v. Estate of Ryan, 149 N.J. 227, 236 , 693 A. 2d 457 (1997); Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1, 8 , 626 A. 2d 1073 (1993).

13
Wingate v. Estate of Ryangreen
nj · 1997 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1999–2026
2 sentences

2026Wingate v. Est. of Ryan, 149 N.J. 227, 236 (1997); Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1, 8 (1993).

2003Wingate v. Estate of Ryan, 149 N.J. 227, 236 , 693 A. 2d 457 (1997); Lesniak v. Budzash, 133 N.J. 1, 8 , 626 A. 2d 1073 (1993).

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
Aponte-Correa v. Allstate Insurance green
nj · 2000
2 sentences

2013Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A.2d 175 (2000) (quoting Township of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A.2d 1159 (1999)).

2013Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A.2d 175 (2000) (quoting Township of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A.2d 1159 (1999)).

62002–2013
State v. Pena green
nj · 2004
2 sentences

2007Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A. 2d 175 (2000) (quoting Twp. of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A. 2d 1159 (1999)); see also DiProspero, supra, 183 N.J. at 492-93 , 874 A. 2d 1039 ; State v. Pena, supra, 178 N.J. at 307-08 , 839 A. 2d 870 . [ Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles, 187 N.J. 197, 206 , 901 A. 2d 303 (2006).] We have summarized our task thusly: "When interpreting a statute or regulation, we endeavor to give meaning to all words and to avoid an interpretation that reduces specific language to mere surplusage." DKM Residential Props.

2007Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A. 2d 175 (2000) (quoting Twp. of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A. 2d 1159 (1999)); see also DiProspero, supra, 183 N.J. at 492-93 , 874 A. 2d 1039 ; State v. Pena, supra, 178 N.J. at 307-08 , 839 A. 2d 870 . [ Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles, 187 N.J. 197, 206 , 901 A. 2d 303 (2006).] We have summarized our task thusly: "When interpreting a statute or regulation, we endeavor to give meaning to all words and to avoid an interpretation that reduces specific language to mere surplusage." DKM Residential Props.

22006–2007
Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles green
nj · 2006
2 sentences

2007Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A. 2d 175 (2000) (quoting Twp. of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A. 2d 1159 (1999)); see also DiProspero, supra, 183 N.J. at 492-93 , 874 A. 2d 1039 ; State v. Pena, supra, 178 N.J. at 307-08 , 839 A. 2d 870 . [ Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles, 187 N.J. 197, 206 , 901 A. 2d 303 (2006).] We have summarized our task thusly: "When interpreting a statute or regulation, we endeavor to give meaning to all words and to avoid an interpretation that reduces specific language to mere surplusage." DKM Residential Props.

2007Co., 162 N.J. 318, 323 , 744 A. 2d 175 (2000) (quoting Twp. of Pennsauken v. Schad, 160 N.J. 156, 170 , 733 A. 2d 1159 (1999)); see also DiProspero, supra, 183 N.J. at 492-93 , 874 A. 2d 1039 ; State v. Pena, supra, 178 N.J. at 307-08 , 839 A. 2d 870 . [ Thomsen v. Mercer-Charles, 187 N.J. 197, 206 , 901 A. 2d 303 (2006).] We have summarized our task thusly: "When interpreting a statute or regulation, we endeavor to give meaning to all words and to avoid an interpretation that reduces specific language to mere surplusage." DKM Residential Props.

12007–2007
NJ Builders, Owners and Managers Association v. Blair green
nj · 1972
2 sentences

2000Above all, we “seek to effectuate the ‘fundamental purpose for which the legislation was enacted.’” Ibid, (quoting New Jersey Builders, Owners and Managers Ass’n v. Blair, 60 N.J. 330, 338 , 288 A.2d 855 (1972)).

2000Above all, we “seek to effectuate the ‘fundamental purpose for which the legislation was enacted.’” Ibid, (quoting New Jersey Builders, Owners and Managers Ass’n v. Blair, 60 N.J. 330, 338 , 288 A.2d 855 (1972)).

12000–2000

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check