14 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
P.E. v. Department of Public Welfaregreen1 sentence2021See also P.E. v. Department of Public Welfare, 692 A.2d 1155, 1157 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1997) (“The record establishes that [the named perpetrator] failed to respond to DPW’s motion [to dismiss]. | 1 | 1 |
Unangst's Appealgreen2 sentences2015"The court will take judicial notice of public statutes.” In re Annual Controller’s Reports for Years 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935 & 1936, Inclusive, 333 Pa. 489 , 5 A.2d 201, 204 (1939). 2015"The court will take judicial notice of public statutes.” In re Annual Controller’s Reports for Years 1932, 1933, 1934, 1935 & 1936, Inclusive, 333 Pa. 489 , 5 A.2d 201, 204 (1939). | 1 | 1 |
Durante v. Pennsylvania State Policegreen2 sentences2009Durante v. Pennsylvania State Police, 570 Pa. 449, 452 , 809 A.2d 369, 371 (2002). . 2009Durante v. Pennsylvania State Police, 570 Pa. 449, 452 , 809 A.2d 369, 371 (2002). . | 1 | 1 |
Simmons v. Cohengreen1 sentence1994When this case came before us on DPW’s motion for summary judgment in Simmons 1, we denied the motion. | 1 | 1 |
Kurtz v. Eriegreen2 sentences1988Compare Kurtz v. City of Erie, 389 Pa. 557, 561 , 133 A.2d 172, 174 (1957), where the Supreme Court, construing the nearly-identical payment provisions of the Heart and Lung Act, Act of June 28, 1935, P.L. 477, as amended, 53 P.S. §637, an act having a similar effect to Act 534, said, “It is significant that this statute provided for the payment of ‘salary’, rather than ‘compensation’ to the policemen or firemen.” 1988Compare Kurtz v. City of Erie, 389 Pa. 557, 561 , 133 A.2d 172, 174 (1957), where the Supreme Court, construing the nearly-identical payment provisions of the Heart and Lung Act, Act of June 28, 1935, P.L. 477, as amended, 53 P.S. §637, an act having a similar effect to Act 534, said, “It is significant that this statute provided for the payment of ‘salary’, rather than ‘compensation’ to the policemen or firemen.” | 1 | 1 |
Kania v. Ebensburg State School & Hospitalgreen2 sentences1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o 1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barnes v. Barnes
green
2 sentences1991This is an appeal by the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) from an order of the Commonwealth Court 126 Pa.Cmwlth. 330 , 559 A.2d 980 affirming the order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas denying DPW’s motion to compel the prothonotary to enter judgment on the docket against Appellee, Reid T. 1991This is an appeal by the Department of Public Welfare (DPW) from an order of the Commonwealth Court 126 Pa.Cmwlth. 330 , 559 A.2d 980 affirming the order of the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas denying DPW’s motion to compel the prothonotary to enter judgment on the docket against Appellee, Reid T. | 2 | 1990–1991 |
Mertz Ex Rel. Mertz v. Houstoun
green
1 sentence2007Mertz v. Houstoun, 155 F.Supp.2d 415 (E.D.Pa.2001), in which the court held, like James and F.K., that the income stream from an annuity is not a countable resource under federal law. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Dempsey Ex Rel. Dempsey v. Department of Public Welfare
green
1 sentence2007Dempsey v. Department of Public Welfare, 756 A.2d 90 (Pa.Cmwlth.2000), requires a different result than that reached in James, Mertz and F.K. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Morrissey v. Department of Highways
green
2 sentences1997In setting forth the burden of proof in Haygood , we looked to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Morrissey v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 87 , 225 A.2d 895 (1967). 1997In setting forth the burden of proof in Haygood , we looked to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court's decision in Morrissey v. Department of Highways, 424 Pa. 87 , 225 A.2d 895 (1967). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
G. S. v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1992Id., 104 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. at 89, 521 A.2d at 89 . 1992Id., 104 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. at 89, 521 A.2d at 89 . | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Trumpikas v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o 1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Spehar v. Commonwealth, Department of Public Welfare
neutral
2 sentences1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o 1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Lightcap v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o 1988See, e.g., Kania v. Ebensburg State School and Hospital, 49 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 136 , 410 A.2d 939 (1980) (hearing before DPW hearing examiner); Trumpikas v. Department of Public Welfare, 50 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 130 , 412 A.2d 218 (1980) (adjudication by Hearing and Appeals Unit of DPW); Spehar v. Department of Public Welfare, 67 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 310 , 447 A.2d 333 (1982) (adjudication by hearing officer of DPW after initial denial of the claim by the employer hospital); Lightcap v. Department of Public Welfare, 107 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 98 , 527 A.2d 1087 (1987) (adjudication by hearing o | 1 | 1988–1988 |
O'Hara v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1987On review, the petitioners, while conceding that the decision to grant or deny a continuance is within the discretion of the Hearing Officer, O’Hara v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 87 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 356 , 487 A.2d 90 (1985), and that our review thereof is limited to determining whether or not the Hearing Officer abused that discretion in so doing id., contend that the denial of a continuance under the circumstances here did constitute such an abuse of discretion. 1987On review, the petitioners, while conceding that the decision to grant or deny a continuance is within the discretion of the Hearing Officer, O’Hara v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, 87 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 356 , 487 A.2d 90 (1985), and that our review thereof is limited to determining whether or not the Hearing Officer abused that discretion in so doing id., contend that the denial of a continuance under the circumstances here did constitute such an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences1983Our long standing rule in this area was first enunciated in Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 522 , 367 A.2d 366 (1976) where we held that hearsay evidence properly objected to is not com petent evidence to support a finding of the agency or board whose adjudication is under review. 1983Our long standing rule in this area was first enunciated in Walker v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 27 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 522 , 367 A.2d 366 (1976) where we held that hearsay evidence properly objected to is not com petent evidence to support a finding of the agency or board whose adjudication is under review. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Temple University v. Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare
green
2 sentences1983OHA granted DPW’s motion on the basis of our decision in Temple University v. Department of Public Welfare, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22 , 407 A.2d 92 (1979), aff’d 490 Pa. 207 , 415 A.2d 413 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 1005 (1980) (Temple III). 1983OHA granted DPW’s motion on the basis of our decision in Temple University v. Department of Public Welfare, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22 , 407 A.2d 92 (1979), aff’d 490 Pa. 207 , 415 A.2d 413 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 1005 (1980) (Temple III). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Temple University, Etc. v. Pa. Dept. Etc.
green
2 sentences1983OHA granted DPW’s motion on the basis of our decision in Temple University v. Department of Public Welfare, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22 , 407 A.2d 92 (1979), aff’d 490 Pa. 207 , 415 A.2d 413 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 1005 (1980) (Temple III). 1983OHA granted DPW’s motion on the basis of our decision in Temple University v. Department of Public Welfare, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22 , 407 A.2d 92 (1979), aff’d 490 Pa. 207 , 415 A.2d 413 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 1005 (1980) (Temple III). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Stevens v. Georgia
neutral
2 sentences1983OHA granted DPW’s motion on the basis of our decision in Temple University v. Department of Public Welfare, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22 , 407 A.2d 92 (1979), aff’d 490 Pa. 207 , 415 A.2d 413 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 1005 (1980) (Temple III). 1983OHA granted DPW’s motion on the basis of our decision in Temple University v. Department of Public Welfare, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 22 , 407 A.2d 92 (1979), aff’d 490 Pa. 207 , 415 A.2d 413 , appeal dismissed, 449 U.S. 1005 (1980) (Temple III). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Mechanicsburg Area School District v. Kline
green
2 sentences1982The DPW further maintains that, because the funds available for Mental Health/Mental Retardation programs are limited, the order of the court below would have the practical effect of decreasing the grants for mental health program's operated by other counties and that those counties should have been joined as indispensable parties, citing Mechanicsburg Area School District v. Kline, 41 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 371 , 399 A.2d 1136 (1979). 1982The DPW further maintains that, because the funds available for Mental Health/Mental Retardation programs are limited, the order of the court below would have the practical effect of decreasing the grants for mental health program's operated by other counties and that those counties should have been joined as indispensable parties, citing Mechanicsburg Area School District v. Kline, 41 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 371 , 399 A.2d 1136 (1979). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Demetriou v. Carlin
green
2 sentences1982Demetriou v. Carlin, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 478 , 408 A.2d 565 (1979), and, inasmuch as the DPW did not challenge the jurisdiction of the court below at the appropriate time, we will consider it to have waived any objection which it may have had thereto. 1982Demetriou v. Carlin, 47 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 478 , 408 A.2d 565 (1979), and, inasmuch as the DPW did not challenge the jurisdiction of the court below at the appropriate time, we will consider it to have waived any objection which it may have had thereto. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.