14 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Contegreen1 sentence2020Commonwealth v. Conte, 198 A.3d 1169, 1173 (Pa. Super. 2018). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki
green
2 sentences2024Id. 2015“In determining whether a substantial question exists, this Court does not examine the merits of the sentencing claim.” Cartrette, 83 A.3d at 1042 , citing Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki, 522 A.2d 17 (Pa. 1987). | 10 | 2013–2024 |
Commonwealth v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2015“Sentencing is a matter vested within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion.” Crump, 995 A.2d at 1282 (citing Commonwealth v. Johnson, 967 A.2d 1001 (Pa.Super.2009)). 2015“Sentencing is a matter vested within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion.” Crump, 995 A.2d at 1282 (citing Commonwealth v. Johnson, 967 A.2d 1001 (Pa.Super.2009)). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Commonwealth v. Crump
green
2 sentences2015“Sentencing is a matter vested within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion.” Crump, 995 A.2d at 1282 (citing Commonwealth v. Johnson, 967 A.2d 1001 (Pa.Super.2009)). 2015“Sentencing is a matter vested within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a manifest abuse of discretion.” Crump, 995 A.2d at 1282 (citing Commonwealth v. Johnson, 967 A.2d 1001 (Pa.Super.2009)). | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Commonwealth v. Cartrette
green
1 sentence2015“In determining whether a substantial question exists, this Court does not examine the merits of the sentencing claim.” Cartrette, 83 A.3d at 1042 , citing Commonwealth v. Tuladziecki, 522 A.2d 17 (Pa. 1987). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Commonwealth v. Malovich
green
2 sentences2008Id. ¶ 15 If an appellant convinces us that a claim presents a substantial question, then we will permit the appeal and will proceed to evaluate the merits of the sentencing claim. 2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.