13 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thompson v. Kaczinskigreen2 sentences2014In this professional negligence action, we consider whether the district court committed reversible error by providing the jury with a causation instruction based upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts rather than an instruction based upon the Restatement (Third) of Torts, as adopted by this court in Thompson v. Kaczinski, 774 N.W.2d 829, 839 (Iowa 2009). 2014In this professional negligence action, we consider whether the district court committed reversible error by providing the jury with a causation instruction based upon the Restatement (Second) of Torts rather than an instruction based upon the Restatement (Third) of Torts, as adopted by this court in Thompson v. Kaczinski 774 N.W.2d 829, 839 (Iowa 2009). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Rohmgreen1 sentence2022State v. 9 Rohm, 609 N.W.2d 504, 509 (Iowa 2000) (en banc). | 1 | 1 |
William Neal Lawson Vs. Linda Irene Kurtzhalsgreen1 sentence2017For his first claim on appeal, Colton asserts the district court committed reversible error when it excluded his photographs and the testimony of four of his witnesses for failing to disclose this evidence during discovery. 3 He claims the court should have considered the four factors outlined in Lawson v. Kurtzhals, 792 N.W.2d 251, 259 (Iowa 2010), before excluding the evidence, and the failure to consider those factors amounts to an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 1 |
State of Iowa v. Kent Anthony Tyler IIIgreen1 sentence2017See State v. Tyler, 873 N.W.2d 741, 752 (Iowa 2016) (explaining joint criminal conduct requires the second crime to be unplanned but reasonably expected to occur in furtherance of the first crime). | 1 | 1 |
Grant v. WAKEDA CAMPGROUND, LLCgreen1 sentence2015See Grant v. Wakeda Campground, LLC, 631 F. Supp. 2d 120, 128 (D.N.H. 2009) (stating “weather forecasts are often wrong”); Lyman v. Town of Cornwall, 318 A.2d 129, 130 (Conn. Ct. App. 1973) (holding forecasts “could not be introduced as evidence of the weather on the days in question” and the district court committed reversible error in allowing such evidence to establish actual weather conditions); Hearst Magazines, Div. of Hearst Corp. v. Cuneo E. | 1 | 1 |
Hearst Magazines v. Cuneo Eastern Press, Inc.green1 sentence2015Press, Inc., 296 F. Supp. 1202, 1204 (E.D. | 1 | 1 |
Lyman v. Cornwallgreen1 sentence2015See Grant v. Wakeda Campground, LLC, 631 F. Supp. 2d 120, 128 (D.N.H. 2009) (stating “weather forecasts are often wrong”); Lyman v. Town of Cornwall, 318 A.2d 129, 130 (Conn. Ct. App. 1973) (holding forecasts “could not be introduced as evidence of the weather on the days in question” and the district court committed reversible error in allowing such evidence to establish actual weather conditions); Hearst Magazines, Div. of Hearst Corp. v. Cuneo E. | 1 | 1 |
Baker v. City of Ottumwagreen1 sentence2003The concept of sole proximate cause “rests on the notion that *85 some third party or other independent event was the sole cause of the plaintiffs injuries.” Baker v. City of Ottumwa, 560 N.W.2d 578, 583 (Iowa 1997). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Den Hartog v. City of Waterloo
green
2 sentences2019We previously observed that "[w]hen an agency in control of land 'which is unused right-of-way' intends to sell the land, ... the agency must determine the fair market value of the land by independent appraisal." Den Hartog I , 847 N.W.2d at 461 (quoting Iowa Code § 306.23 (1) ). [T]he statute does not specifically identify the time for the valuation to take place. 2019We previously observed that “[w]hen an agency in control of land ‘which is unused right-of-way’ intends to sell the land, . . . the agency must determine the fair market value of the land by independent appraisal.” Den Hartog I, 847 N.W.2d at 461 (quoting Iowa Code § 306.23 (1)). [T]he statute does not specifically identify the time for the valuation to take place. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Watts
green
2 sentences2015Id. 2015Id. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Meier v. SENECAUT III
green
1 sentence2024On appeal, Scheer claims “the district court committed reversible error” by failing to “address Scheer’s breach of implied warranty claim.” “When a district court fails to rule on an issue properly raised by a party, the party who raised the issue must file a motion requesting a ruling in order to preserve error for appeal.” Meier, 641 N.W.2d at 537 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Easter
green
1 sentence1995Probable cause in this instance is “the belief of a person of reasonable caution that an offense ... is being committed.” Id. at 887 . *450 Because the search warrant here was invalid, the district court committed reversible error when it overruled Gillespie’s motion to suppress. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.