record at the suppression hearing in Maryland

13 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

Case	Followed	Cited
Lee v. Stategreen md · 1988 · cited in 8 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1994–2007 2 sentences 1994Because the record at the suppression hearing is the exclusive source of the facts for our review, Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235, 237 (1988), we do not take this supplemental report into consideration. . 1994Because the record at the suppression hearing is the exclusive source of the facts for our review, Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235, 237 (1988), we do not take this supplemental report into consideration. .	1	8
Trusty v. Stategreen md · 1987 · cited in 4 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1988–2001 2 sentences 2001Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235 (1988) (citing Trusty v. State, 308 Md. 658, 670-72 , 521 A.2d 749 (1987)); Aiken v. State, 101 Md.App. 557, 563 , 647 A.2d 1229 (1994) (citing Jackson v. State, 52 Md.App. 327, 332 n. 5, 449 A.2d 438 (1982)). 2001Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235 (1988) (citing Trusty v. State, 308 Md. 658, 670-72 , 521 A.2d 749 (1987)); Aiken v. State, 101 Md.App. 557, 563 , 647 A.2d 1229 (1994) (citing Jackson v. State, 52 Md.App. 327, 332 n. 5, 449 A.2d 438 (1982)).	1	4
Rowe v. Stategreen md · 2001 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004 1 sentence 2004See Rowe v. State, 363 Md. *195 424, 431-32, 769 A.2d 879, 883 (2001).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Aiken v. State green mdctspecapp · 1994 2 sentences 2002Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235 (1988); Aiken v. State, 101 Md.App. 557, 563 , 647 A.2d 1229 (1994), cert. denied, 337 Md. 89 , 651 A.2d 854 (1995). 2002Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235 (1988); Aiken v. State, 101 Md.App. 557, 563 , 647 A.2d 1229 (1994), cert. denied, 337 Md. 89 , 651 A.2d 854 (1995).	5	1999–2002
State v. Rucker green md · 2003 2 sentences 2017State v. Rucker, 374 Md. 199, 207 , 821 A.2d 439 (2003). 2017State v. Rucker, 374 Md. 199, 207 , 821 A.2d 439 (2003).	1	2017–2017
Gorge v. State green md · 2005 2 sentences 2009Gorge, 386 Md. at 621 , 873 A.2d 1171 ; Winder, 362 Md. at 311 , 765 A.2d 97 . 2009Gorge, 386 Md. at 621 , 873 A.2d 1171 ; Winder, 362 Md. at 311 , 765 A.2d 97 .	1	2009–2009
Winder v. State green md · 2001 2 sentences 2009Gorge, 386 Md. at 621 , 873 A.2d 1171 ; Winder, 362 Md. at 311 , 765 A.2d 97 . 2009Gorge, 386 Md. at 621 , 873 A.2d 1171 ; Winder, 362 Md. at 311 , 765 A.2d 97 .	1	2009–2009
Christian v. State green mdctspecapp · 2007 2 sentences 2008STANDARD of REVIEW We recently discussed, in Christian v. State 172 Md.App. 212, 216 , 914 A.2d 151 (2007), the appropriate standard for reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress: 6 In reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, the record at the suppression hearing is our exclusive source of facts. 2008STANDARD of REVIEW We recently discussed, in Christian v. State 172 Md.App. 212, 216 , 914 A.2d 151 (2007), the appropriate standard for reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress: 6 In reviewing the denial of a motion to suppress evidence, the record at the suppression hearing is our exclusive source of facts.	1	2008–2008
Jackson v. State green mdctspecapp · 1982 2 sentences 2001Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235 (1988) (citing Trusty v. State, 308 Md. 658, 670-72 , 521 A.2d 749 (1987)); Aiken v. State, 101 Md.App. 557, 563 , 647 A.2d 1229 (1994) (citing Jackson v. State, 52 Md.App. 327, 332 n. 5, 449 A.2d 438 (1982)). 2001Lee v. State, 311 Md. 642, 648 , 537 A.2d 235 (1988) (citing Trusty v. State, 308 Md. 658, 670-72 , 521 A.2d 749 (1987)); Aiken v. State, 101 Md.App. 557, 563 , 647 A.2d 1229 (1994) (citing Jackson v. State, 52 Md.App. 327, 332 n. 5, 449 A.2d 438 (1982)).	1	2001–2001

Where else courts name it

NY 16 (1981–2024) PA 13 (2014–2023) MD 13 (1988–2017) UT 4 (1990–1996) OH 2 (2021–2023) IL 2 (2011–2011) MO 2 (1990–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check