cannot rule (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

cannot rule in Missouri

13 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1936–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Marshall v. Edlingreen
moctapp · 1985 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1987–1990
2 sentences

1990Castle v. Modern Farm Equipment Co., 729 S.W.2d 650, 653 (Mo.App.1987); Marshall v. Edlin, 690 S.W.2d 477, 479 (Mo.App.1985).

1987Marshall, supra, at 479 .

12
In Re Adoption of CMBRgreen
mo · 2011 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013
1 sentence

2013Mother also attempts to make the juvenile officer’s participation necessary for her benefit, rather than Child’s best interest, by arguing she was denied due process because “the Juvenile Officer should have independently investigated whether the statutory requirements were satisfied for a private adoption ... [and] offered services to Mother.” This argument misstates the reason the Supreme Court required the juvenile officer’s participation: “Just as it is in [Cjhild’s best interest for the GAL to discharge his or her duties diligently, it also is in [CJhild’s best interest for the juvenile o

11
Lawton v. E.J.green
moctapp · 1990 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012“This court cannot rule on the weight of evidence in a jury tried case.” George v. Eaton, 789 S.W.2d 56, 61 (Mo.App.

11
State v. Winfreygreen
mo · 2011 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012
1 sentence

2012Although the trial court has discretion in.limiting the scope and extent of cross-examination bearing on the witness’s bias or interest, the court cannot bar cross-examination into that subject completely.” Winfrey, 337 S.W.3d at 8 (internal quotations and citations omitted).

11
State v. Solvengreen
mo · 1963 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011State v. Solven, 371 S.W.2d 328, 332 (Mo. banc 1963).

11
Warren v. Thompsongreen
moctapp · 1993 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1997–1997
1 sentence

1997Warren v. Thompson, 862 S.W.2d 513, 514 (Mo.App.

11
Castle v. Modern Farm Equipment Co.green
moctapp · 1987 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1990–1990
1 sentence

1990Castle v. Modern Farm Equipment Co., 729 S.W.2d 650, 653 (Mo.App.1987); Marshall v. Edlin, 690 S.W.2d 477, 479 (Mo.App.1985).

11
State v. Blairgreen
mo · 1982 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984
1 sentence

1984State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 753 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1030 reh. denied, 459 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 , 75 L.Ed.2d 472 (1983).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Tanisha Ross-Paige v. Saint Louis Metropolitan Police Department Steven A. Gori, Michael A. Deeba, Sr., Saint Louis Board of Police Commissioners, Richard H. Gray, Bettye Battle Turner, Thomas J. Irwin, and Francis G. Slay green
mo · 2016
1 sentence

2021The Court explained that reversal was required because “this Court cannot rule out the possibility that the jury improperly returned its verdict upon a theory that was not supported by substantial evidence and that misdirected or confused the jury.” Id. at 176 .

12021–2021
Newell v. Rammage green
moctapp · 1999
1 sentence

2000Newell, 7 S.W.3d at 524 .

12000–2000
Delf v. Cartwright green
moctapp · 1983
1 sentence

1985Delf v. Cartwright, 651 S.W.2d 622 (Mo.App.1983), Lewis v. Colombia Mut.

11985–1985
Maryland v. United States Tandy Corporation v. United States North American Telephone Association v. United States Illinois v. United States green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1984State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 753 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1030 reh. denied, 459 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 , 75 L.Ed.2d 472 (1983).

1984State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 753 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1030 reh. denied, 459 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 , 75 L.Ed.2d 472 (1983).

11984–1984
Horton v. Georgia green
scotus · 1983
2 sentences

1984State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 753 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1030 reh. denied, 459 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 , 75 L.Ed.2d 472 (1983).

1984State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 753 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1030 reh. denied, 459 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 , 75 L.Ed.2d 472 (1983).

11984–1984
Colorado v. New Mexico green
scotus · 1983
1 sentence

1984State v. Blair, 638 S.W.2d 739, 753 (Mo. banc 1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1188 , 103 S.Ct. 838 , 74 L.Ed.2d 1030 reh. denied, 459 U.S. 1229 , 103 S.Ct. 1240 , 75 L.Ed.2d 472 (1983).

11984–1984
Goodman v. Allen Cab Co. green
mo · 1950
2 sentences

1971Goodman v. Allen Cab Co., *621 360 Mo. 1094 , 232 S.W.2d 535 , Lindsey v. P. J.

1971Goodman v. Allen Cab Co., *621 360 Mo. 1094 , 232 S.W.2d 535 , Lindsey v. P. J.

11971–1971
Lee v. St. Louis Public Service Co. neutral
· 1935
2 sentences

1936Co., 337 Mo. 1169 , 88 S.W.2d 337 .] [6] While we have held that the court cannot rule as a matter of law that placing the tin over the hole in the bottom of the car was an intervening act which became the sole cause of plaintiff's injury and prevented defendant's negligence from being the proximate cause thereof, yet unquestionably defendant was entitled to have the jury decide that issue.

1936Co., 337 Mo. 1169 , 88 S.W.2d 337 .] [6] While we have held that the court cannot rule as a matter of law that placing the tin over the hole in the bottom of the car was an intervening act which became the sole cause of plaintiff's injury and prevented defendant's negligence from being the proximate cause thereof, yet unquestionably defendant was entitled to have the jury decide that issue.

11936–1936

Where else courts name it

TX 17 (1920–2026) NY 15 (1836–2024) IL 15 (1972–2024) CA 14 (1919–2025) MO 13 (1936–2021) AL 8 (1976–2010) NC 6 (1913–2018) GA 6 (1979–2006) DE 6 (2015–2021) TN 6 (1999–2026) LA 6 (1957–2022) MS 6 (1995–2016) FL 6 (1966–2016) PA 5 (1926–2019) CT 5 (1992–2017) UT 5 (1983–2004) MD 5 (1953–1978) WA 4 (1968–2021) ID 4 (1922–1985) NJ 4 (1970–2024) ME 4 (2008–2018) OK 4 (1923–2020) OH 4 (2007–2026) OR 3 (1963–2025) IN 3 (2013–2014) AR 2 (1962–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check