13 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2007–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Shirley v. Kruse, Unpublished Decision (1-19-2007)green2 sentences2025An appellant bears the burden of showing prejudicial error by reference to matters in the record.’” State v. Thomas, 2007-Ohio-1344, ¶ 11 (2d Dist.), quoting Shirley v. Kruse, 2007-Ohio-193, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.). “‘When portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned errors are omitted from the record, we have nothing to pass upon and, thus, we have no choice but to presume the validity of the lower court’s proceedings and affirm.’” Id. 2025An appellant bears the burden of showing prejudicial error by reference to matters in the record.’” State v. Thomas, 2007-Ohio-1344, ¶ 11 (2d Dist.), quoting Shirley v. Kruse, 2007-Ohio-193, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.). “‘When portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned errors are omitted from the record, we have nothing to pass upon and, thus, we have no choice but to presume the validity of the lower court’s proceedings and affirm.’” Id. | 1 | 9 |
Banks v. Regan, 21929 (1-11-2008)green1 sentence2025We have also held that “[a]bsent a transcript of the hearing, we are constrained to presume the regularity of the proceedings below unless the limited record for -17- our review affirmatively demonstrates error.” State v. Like, 2008-Ohio-1873, ¶ 33 (2d Dist.), citing Banks v. Regan, 2008-Ohio-188, ¶ 2 (2d Dist.). {¶ 45} In this case, by failing to file a transcript of the suppression hearing, Hayes has not provided this court with a proper record upon which to consider affording him appellate relief. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Like, 21991 (4-18-2008)green1 sentence2025We have also held that “[a]bsent a transcript of the hearing, we are constrained to presume the regularity of the proceedings below unless the limited record for -17- our review affirmatively demonstrates error.” State v. Like, 2008-Ohio-1873, ¶ 33 (2d Dist.), citing Banks v. Regan, 2008-Ohio-188, ¶ 2 (2d Dist.). {¶ 45} In this case, by failing to file a transcript of the suppression hearing, Hayes has not provided this court with a proper record upon which to consider affording him appellate relief. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Thomasgreen1 sentence2025An appellant bears the burden of showing prejudicial error by reference to matters in the record.’” State v. Thomas, 2007-Ohio-1344, ¶ 11 (2d Dist.), quoting Shirley v. Kruse, 2007-Ohio-193, ¶ 22 (2d Dist.). “‘When portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned errors are omitted from the record, we have nothing to pass upon and, thus, we have no choice but to presume the validity of the lower court’s proceedings and affirm.’” Id. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories
green
2 sentences2015Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197, 199 , 400 N.E.2d 384 (1980). 2015Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories, 61 Ohio St.2d 197, 199 , 400 N.E.2d 384 (1980). | 4 | 2007–2015 |
State v. Federal Insurance Company, Unpublished Decision (12-22-2005)
green
1 sentence2008Id. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Martin
green
1 sentence2008State v. Martin (1983), 20 Ohio App.3d 172 . {¶ 6} An appellant who makes a weight of the evidence argument bears the burden of showing prejudicial error by reference to matters in the record. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
McBride v. Quebe, Unpublished Decision (9-29-2006)
neutral
1 sentence2007“When portions of the transcript necessary for resolution of assigned errors are omitted from the record, we have nothing to pass upon and, thus, we have no choice but to presume the validity of the lower court’s proceedings and affirm.” Id. {¶ 12} Presuming the validity of the lower court’s proceedings on Thomas’s motion to suppress, Thomas’s second assignment of error is overruled. {¶ 13} We next address Thomas’s sixth assignment of error, which is as follows: {¶ 14} “Appellant was deprived of due process and a fair trial through the presentation of faulty or incomplete jury instructions.” { | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.