13 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 1993–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Elliottgreen2 sentences2017Huber Heights v. Duty, 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (2d Dist.1985), quoting Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63, fn. 2 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); 3 State v. Gensert, 2016-Ohio-1163 , 61 N.E.3d 636 , ¶ 30 (11th Dist.) (“when a defendant makes claims of innocence after a guilty plea has been accepted, a trial court has no duty to inquire into a defendant’s reasons for pleading guilty”) (citation omitted); State v. Elliott, 86 Ohio App.3d 792, 795 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 (12th Dist.1993) (“a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing e 2017Huber Heights v. Duty, 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (2d Dist.1985), quoting Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63, fn. 2 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); 3 State v. Gensert, 2016-Ohio-1163 , 61 N.E.3d 636 , ¶ 30 (11th Dist.) (“when a defendant makes claims of innocence after a guilty plea has been accepted, a trial court has no duty to inquire into a defendant’s reasons for pleading guilty”) (citation omitted); State v. Elliott, 86 Ohio App.3d 792, 795 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 (12th Dist.1993) (“a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing e | 1 | 6 |
Boykin v. Alabamagreen1 sentence2025State v. Elliott, 2021-Ohio-424, ¶ 5 (1st Dist.), citing State v. Ballard, 66 Ohio Athens App. No. 24CA33 7 St.2d 473, 423 N.E.2d 115 (1981), paragraph one of the syllabus, citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969). {¶15} Unlike a defendant's non-constitutional rights, “strict compliance with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) is required because constitutional rights are involved.” Collins at ¶ 7 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Elliottgreen1 sentence2025State v. Elliott, 2021-Ohio-424, ¶ 5 (1st Dist.), citing State v. Ballard, 66 Ohio Athens App. No. 24CA33 7 St.2d 473, 423 N.E.2d 115 (1981), paragraph one of the syllabus, citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969). {¶15} Unlike a defendant's non-constitutional rights, “strict compliance with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) is required because constitutional rights are involved.” Collins at ¶ 7 . | 1 | 1 |
Menna v. New Yorkgreen2 sentences2017Huber Heights v. Duty, 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (2d Dist.1985), quoting Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63, fn. 2 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); 3 State v. Gensert, 2016-Ohio-1163 , 61 N.E.3d 636 , ¶ 30 (11th Dist.) (“when a defendant makes claims of innocence after a guilty plea has been accepted, a trial court has no duty to inquire into a defendant’s reasons for pleading guilty”) (citation omitted); State v. Elliott, 86 Ohio App.3d 792, 795 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 (12th Dist.1993) (“a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing e 2017Huber Heights v. Duty, 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (2d Dist.1985), quoting Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63, fn. 2 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); 3 State v. Gensert, 2016-Ohio-1163 , 61 N.E.3d 636 , ¶ 30 (11th Dist.) (“when a defendant makes claims of innocence after a guilty plea has been accepted, a trial court has no duty to inquire into a defendant’s reasons for pleading guilty”) (citation omitted); State v. Elliott, 86 Ohio App.3d 792, 795 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 (12th Dist.1993) (“a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing e | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of Huber Heights v. Duty
green
2 sentences2017Huber Heights v. Duty, 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (2d Dist.1985), quoting Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63, fn. 2 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); 3 State v. Gensert, 2016-Ohio-1163 , 61 N.E.3d 636 , ¶ 30 (11th Dist.) (“when a defendant makes claims of innocence after a guilty plea has been accepted, a trial court has no duty to inquire into a defendant’s reasons for pleading guilty”) (citation omitted); State v. Elliott, 86 Ohio App.3d 792, 795 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 (12th Dist.1993) (“a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing e 2017Huber Heights v. Duty, 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (2d Dist.1985), quoting Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63, fn. 2 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); 3 State v. Gensert, 2016-Ohio-1163 , 61 N.E.3d 636 , ¶ 30 (11th Dist.) (“when a defendant makes claims of innocence after a guilty plea has been accepted, a trial court has no duty to inquire into a defendant’s reasons for pleading guilty”) (citation omitted); State v. Elliott, 86 Ohio App.3d 792, 795 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 (12th Dist.1993) (“a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing e | 4 | 1993–2017 |
State v. Ballard
green
1 sentence2025State v. Elliott, 2021-Ohio-424, ¶ 5 (1st Dist.), citing State v. Ballard, 66 Ohio Athens App. No. 24CA33 7 St.2d 473, 423 N.E.2d 115 (1981), paragraph one of the syllabus, citing Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238, 242 (1969). {¶15} Unlike a defendant's non-constitutional rights, “strict compliance with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) is required because constitutional rights are involved.” Collins at ¶ 7 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Gensert
green
1 sentence2017Huber Heights v. Duty, 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (2d Dist.1985), quoting Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63, fn. 2 , 96 S.Ct. 241 , 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); 3 State v. Gensert, 2016-Ohio-1163 , 61 N.E.3d 636 , ¶ 30 (11th Dist.) (“when a defendant makes claims of innocence after a guilty plea has been accepted, a trial court has no duty to inquire into a defendant’s reasons for pleading guilty”) (citation omitted); State v. Elliott, 86 Ohio App.3d 792, 795 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 (12th Dist.1993) (“a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing e | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Perry
green
1 sentence2015In his second assignment of error, appellant contends the trial court erred when it ruled that res judicata barred each of the claims raised in appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty plea. {¶ 10} "Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment of conviction bars a convicted defendant who was represented by counsel from raising and litigating in any proceeding except an appeal from that judgment, any defense or any claimed lack of due process that was raised or could have been raised by the defendant at the trial, which resulted in that judgment of conviction, or on an appeal from that | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Tate, Unpublished Decision (5-4-2005)
green
1 sentence2014Summit No. 21943, 2005-Ohio-2156, ¶ 13 ). {¶44} Bibler has a right to a trial by jury under the United States Constitution and the Ohio Constitution; however, Bibler does not have the right to insist on the opposite of that right. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
State v. Murphy
green
1 sentence2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Brady v. United States
green
2 sentences2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). 2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Spates
green
2 sentences2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). 2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Murphy
green
2 sentences2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). 2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Spates
green
1 sentence2005Hildebrandt, P.J., Gorman and Sundermann, JJ. 1 See State v. Elliott (1993), 86 Ohio App.3d 792 , 621 N.E.2d 1272 , citing Huber Hts. v. Duty (1985), 27 Ohio App.3d 244 , 500 N.E.2d 339 (a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence). 2 State v. Spates, 64 Ohio St.3d 269 , 272 , 1992-Ohio-130 , 595 N.E.2d 351 , citing Brady v. United States (1970), 397 U.S. 742 , 90 S.Ct. 1463 . 3 See State v. Murphy, 91 Ohio St.3d 516 , 542 , 2001-Ohio-112 , 747 N.E.2d 765 (ineffective assistance cannot be inferred from a silent record). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio
neutral
1 sentence2000Stern v. Mascio (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 422 , 424 , 662 N.E.2d 370 , 372 , reconsideration denied (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 1489 , 664 N.E.2d 540 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Sargeant
neutral
1 sentence2000Stern v. Mascio (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 422 , 424 , 662 N.E.2d 370 , 372 , reconsideration denied (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 1489 , 664 N.E.2d 540 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State ex rel. Stern v. Mascio
green
2 sentences2000Stern v. Mascio (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 422 , 424 , 662 N.E.2d 370 , 372 , reconsideration denied (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 1489 , 664 N.E.2d 540 . 2000Stern v. Mascio (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 422 , 424 , 662 N.E.2d 370 , 372 , reconsideration denied (1996), 75 Ohio St.3d 1489 , 664 N.E.2d 540 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Santobello v. New York
green
1 sentence1999In Santobello v. New York (1971), 404 U.S. 257 , the United States Supreme Court held that the prosecution must honor any commitment or representation that it makes to a defendant as an inducement for a guilty plea: "This phase of the process of criminal justice, and the adjudicative element inherent in accepting a plea of guilty, must be attended by safeguards to insure the defendant what is reasonably due in the circumstances. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
North Carolina v. Alford
green
2 sentences1995C Because a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of significant constitutional rights, it must represent “a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.” North Carolina v. Alford (1970), 400 U.S. 25, 31 , 91 S.Ct. 160, 164 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162, 168 ; State v. DeNardis (Dec. 29, 1993), Medina App. No. 2245-M, unreported, at 6, 1993 WL 548761 *2-3. 1995C Because a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of significant constitutional rights, it must represent “a voluntary and intelligent choice among the alternative courses of action open to the defendant.” North Carolina v. Alford (1970), 400 U.S. 25, 31 , 91 S.Ct. 160, 164 , 27 L.Ed.2d 162, 168 ; State v. DeNardis (Dec. 29, 1993), Medina App. No. 2245-M, unreported, at 6, 1993 WL 548761 *2-3. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
State v. Gibson
green
2 sentences1993“Where the record contains no evidence which would justify the filing of a motion to suppress, the appellant has not met his burden of proving that his attorney violated an essential duty by failing to file the motion.” State v. Gibson (1980), 69 Ohio App.2d 91, 95 , 23 O.O.3d 130, 132-133 , 430 N.E.2d 954, 957 . 1 Moreover, a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence. 1993“Where the record contains no evidence which would justify the filing of a motion to suppress, the appellant has not met his burden of proving that his attorney violated an essential duty by failing to file the motion.” State v. Gibson (1980), 69 Ohio App.2d 91, 95 , 23 O.O.3d 130, 132-133 , 430 N.E.2d 954, 957 . 1 Moreover, a guilty plea constitutes a waiver of alleged errors by the trial court in not suppressing evidence. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.