12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2010–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Rigsbygreen2 sentences2012Moreover, the court noted the DNA-analysis fee "`is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis.'" Marshall, 242 Ill.2d at 296 , 351 Ill.Dec. 172 , 950 N.E.2d at 676 (quoting People v. Rigsby, 405 Ill.App.3d 916, 919 , 346 Ill.Dec. 113 , 940 N.E.2d 113, 115 (2010)). 2012Moreover, the court noted the DNA-analysis fee "`is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis.'" Marshall, 242 Ill.2d at 296 , 351 Ill.Dec. 172 , 950 N.E.2d at 676 (quoting People v. Rigsby, 405 Ill.App.3d 916, 919 , 346 Ill.Dec. 113 , 940 N.E.2d 113, 115 (2010)). | 3 | 6 |
People v. Bomargreen2 sentences2011See Bomar, 405 Ill. 2011See Bomar, 405 Ill. | 3 | 3 |
People v. Marshallgreen2 sentences2012Moreover, the court noted the DNA-analysis fee "`is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis.'" Marshall, 242 Ill.2d at 296 , 351 Ill.Dec. 172 , 950 N.E.2d at 676 (quoting People v. Rigsby, 405 Ill.App.3d 916, 919 , 346 Ill.Dec. 113 , 940 N.E.2d 113, 115 (2010)). 2012Moreover, the court noted the DNA-analysis fee "`is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis.'" Marshall, 242 Ill.2d at 296 , 351 Ill.Dec. 172 , 950 N.E.2d at 676 (quoting People v. Rigsby, 405 Ill.App.3d 916, 919 , 346 Ill.Dec. 113 , 940 N.E.2d 113, 115 (2010)). | 1 | 8 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Guadarrama
green
2 sentences2011Our supreme court explained in People v. Marshall, 242 Ill. 2d 285, 296 (2011), that the DNA analysis fee “is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis.” From Marshall, the Second District reasoned that the DNA analysis fee is not imposed on a defendant as punishment, but is used to “cover the costs incurred in collecting and testing a DNA sample that is taken from a defendant convicted of a qualifying offense.” People v. Guadarrama, 2011 IL App (2d) 100072, ¶ 13 . 2011Our supreme court explained in People v. Marshall, 242 Ill.2d 285, 296 , 351 Ill.Dec. 172 , 950 N.E.2d 668 (2011), that the DNA analysis fee "is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis[.]" From Marshall , the Second District reasoned that the DNA analysis fee is not imposed on a defendant as punishment, but is used to "cover the costs incurred in collecting and testing a DNA sample that is taken from a defendant convicted of a qualifying offense." People v. Guadarrama, 2011 IL App (2d) 100072, ¶ 13 , 353 Ill.Dec. 148 , 955 N.E.2d 615 . | 3 | 2011–2012 |
People v. Guadarrama
green
2 sentences2011Our supreme court explained in People v. Marshall, 242 Ill.2d 285, 296 , 351 Ill.Dec. 172 , 950 N.E.2d 668 (2011), that the DNA analysis fee "is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis[.]" From Marshall , the Second District reasoned that the DNA analysis fee is not imposed on a defendant as punishment, but is used to "cover the costs incurred in collecting and testing a DNA sample that is taken from a defendant convicted of a qualifying offense." People v. Guadarrama, 2011 IL App (2d) 100072, ¶ 13 , 353 Ill.Dec. 148 , 955 N.E.2d 615 . 2011Our supreme court explained in People v. Marshall, 242 Ill.2d 285, 296 , 351 Ill.Dec. 172 , 950 N.E.2d 668 (2011), that the DNA analysis fee "is intended to cover the costs of the DNA analysis[.]" From Marshall , the Second District reasoned that the DNA analysis fee is not imposed on a defendant as punishment, but is used to "cover the costs incurred in collecting and testing a DNA sample that is taken from a defendant convicted of a qualifying offense." People v. Guadarrama, 2011 IL App (2d) 100072, ¶ 13 , 353 Ill.Dec. 148 , 955 N.E.2d 615 . | 2 | 2011–2012 |
People v. Willis
green
2 sentences2010See Bomar, 405 Ill.App.3d at ___ -___, 344 Ill.Dec. 832 , 937 N.E.2d 1173 (McDade, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); People v. Willis, 402 Ill. 2010See Bomar, slip op. at 21-22 (McDade, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part); People v. Willis, 402 Ill. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.