sentence renders challenge in Illinois

2024ANALYSIS ¶ 22 On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the trial court should have granted his motion to suppress, (2) his waiver of his right to a jury trial was invalid, (3) the subsections of the AUUW statute under which he was convicted violate the second amendment to the United States Constitution, and (4) if we affirm his convictions, all but one should be vacated pursuant to the one-act, one-crime rule. ¶ 23 According to the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) website, defendant has completed his sentence and is no longer in IDOC custody. 3 Nevertheless, he can still challenge his con

2024See In re Christopher K., 217 Ill. 2d 348, 359 (2005) (noting that “the completion of a defendant’s sentence renders a challenge to the sentence moot”). -2- No. 1-22-1562 observed a person flashing a gun, how long it had been since the caller said there was a person flashing a gun, or how the caller knew there was a person flashing a gun. ¶7 The officers drove towards the Falcon Fuel gas station where they observed an individual matching the description in the parking lot of the gas station.

2005People v. Lynn, 102 Ill. 2d 267, 272-73 (1984).

2005People v. Lynn, 102 Ill.2d 267, 272-73 , 80 Ill.Dec. 48 , 464 N.E.2d 1031 (1984).

2022Here, defendant challenges his conviction, in which he has an ongoing interest, given the “obvious advantages in purging oneself of the stigma and disabilities -7- which attend a criminal conviction.” People v. Davis, 39 Ill. 2d 325, 329 , 235 N.E.2d 634, 636 (1968).

2022Here, defendant challenges his conviction, in which he has an ongoing interest, given the “obvious advantages in purging oneself of the stigma and disabilities -7- which attend a criminal conviction.” People v. Davis, 39 Ill. 2d 325, 329 , 235 N.E.2d 634, 636 (1968).