12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Whiteheadgreen2 sentences2001People v. Whitehead, 169 Ill.2d 355, 371 , 215 Ill.Dec. 164 , 662 N.E.2d 1304 (1996). 2001People v. Whitehead, 169 Ill. 2d 355, 371 (1996). | 1 | 2 |
People v. Paynegreen2 sentences1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition. 1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2003We next address respondent’s contention that the State exercised a peremptory challenge to exclude the only black member of the venire in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 90 L. 2003We next address respondent’s contention that the State exercised a peremptory challenge to exclude the only black member of the venire in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 90 L. | 3 | 1990–2003 |
People v. Bowman
green
2 sentences2002Bowman , 325 Ill. 2002Bowman, 325 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
United States v. Tokars
green
2 sentences2001The government conceded: “ ‘We did not strike men just to strike men nor did we strike women just to strike women. *** In fact, the defendant could have wiped out the entire sex of women with their strikes and still had five to go and as a matter of principle, I think that every sex should he represented at a trial of this nature as should every race be represented and so we undertook a course of action anticipating the defendants would do what they did, which was strike almost in the exact opposite proportion of women to men ***.’ ” Tokars, 95 F.3d at 1532 . 2001The government conceded: "`We did not strike men just to strike men nor did we strike women just to strike women. * * * In fact, the defendant could have wiped out the entire sex of women with their strikes and still had five to go and as a matter of principle, I think that every sex should be represented at a trial of this nature as should every race be represented and so we undertook a course of action anticipating the defendants would do what they did, which was strike almost in the exact opposite proportion of women to men * * *.'" Tokars, 95 F.3d at 1532 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
The People v. Ikerd
green
2 sentences1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition. 1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
People v. Leamons
green
1 sentence1988The State cites People v. Leamons (1984), 127 Ill. | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Witherspoon v. Illinois
green
2 sentences1983EXCLUSION OF JURORS AT THE SENTENCING HEARING Szabo contends that two prospective jurors were improperly excused from the venire in violation of Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968), 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L. 1983EXCLUSION OF JURORS AT THE SENTENCING HEARING Szabo contends that two prospective jurors were improperly excused from the venire in violation of Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968), 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.