venire violation (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

venire violation in Illinois

12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2003 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
People v. Whiteheadgreen
ill · 1996 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
2 sentences

2001People v. Whitehead, 169 Ill.2d 355, 371 , 215 Ill.Dec. 164 , 662 N.E.2d 1304 (1996).

2001People v. Whitehead, 169 Ill. 2d 355, 371 (1996).

12
People v. Paynegreen
ill · 1983 · cited in 1 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992
2 sentences

1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition.

1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Batson v. Kentucky green
scotus · 1986
2 sentences

2003We next address respondent’s contention that the State exercised a peremptory challenge to exclude the only black member of the venire in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 90 L.

2003We next address respondent’s contention that the State exercised a peremptory challenge to exclude the only black member of the venire in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 , 90 L.

31990–2003
People v. Bowman green
illappct · 2001
2 sentences

2002Bowman , 325 Ill.

2002Bowman, 325 Ill.

22002–2002
United States v. Tokars green
ca11 · 1996
2 sentences

2001The government conceded: “ ‘We did not strike men just to strike men nor did we strike women just to strike women. *** In fact, the defendant could have wiped out the entire sex of women with their strikes and still had five to go and as a matter of principle, I think that every sex should he represented at a trial of this nature as should every race be represented and so we undertook a course of action anticipating the defendants would do what they did, which was strike almost in the exact opposite proportion of women to men ***.’ ” Tokars, 95 F.3d at 1532 .

2001The government conceded: "`We did not strike men just to strike men nor did we strike women just to strike women. * * * In fact, the defendant could have wiped out the entire sex of women with their strikes and still had five to go and as a matter of principle, I think that every sex should be represented at a trial of this nature as should every race be represented and so we undertook a course of action anticipating the defendants would do what they did, which was strike almost in the exact opposite proportion of women to men * * *.'" Tokars, 95 F.3d at 1532 .

22001–2001
The People v. Ikerd green
ill · 1970
2 sentences

1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition.

1992Payne, 99 Ill. 2d at 141 , 457 N.E.2d at 1205 (Simon, J., dissenting). 2 AIthough Illinois courts recognize fundamental fairness as a means by which to avoid the effect of a procedural default (see, e.g., People v. Ikerd (1970), 47 Ill. 2d 211 , 265 N.E.2d 120 ), the doctrine escapes precise definition.

11992–1992
People v. Leamons green
illappct · 1984
1 sentence

1988The State cites People v. Leamons (1984), 127 Ill.

11988–1988
Witherspoon v. Illinois green
scotus · 1968
2 sentences

1983EXCLUSION OF JURORS AT THE SENTENCING HEARING Szabo contends that two prospective jurors were improperly excused from the venire in violation of Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968), 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L.

1983EXCLUSION OF JURORS AT THE SENTENCING HEARING Szabo contends that two prospective jurors were improperly excused from the venire in violation of Witherspoon v. Illinois (1968), 391 U.S. 510 , 20 L.

11983–1983

Where else courts name it

IL 12 (1983–2003) AL 9 (1892–1995) MS 6 (1967–2003) PA 4 (1949–2004) MO 3 (1988–2018) FL 3 (1993–1996) TX 2 (2016–2025) MD 2 (1996–2000)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check