12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1940–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reynaud v. Bullockgreen2 sentences2013Concerning reformation, this Court has long held: ‘It is an established rule of law in our jurisprudence that ‘Either party is always permitted, in a suit between the parties to a contract, to correct any error in the instrument purporting to evidence the contract, so as to make it express truly and correctly the intention of the parties,’ * * * provided the rights of third parties have not intervened. * * * The error or mistake must be mutual. * * * The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error * * * and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proo 2013Concerning reformation, this Court has long held: ‘It is an established rule of law in our jurisprudence that ‘Either party is always permitted, in a suit between the parties to a contract, to correct any error in the instrument purporting to evidence the contract, so as to make it express truly and correctly the intention of the parties,’ * * * provided the rights of third parties have not intervened. * * * The error or mistake must be mutual. * * * The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error * * * and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proo | 3 | 5 |
B. Segall Company, Inc. v. Trahangreen1 sentence2013Segall Co. v. Trahan, 290 So.2d 854, 858 (La. 1974); Merritt v. Hays, 237 La. 557, 562-63 , 111 So.2d 771, 773 (1959). | 1 | 1 |
Merritt v. Haysgreen2 sentences2013Segall Co. v. Trahan, 290 So.2d 854, 858 (La. 1974); Merritt v. Hays, 237 La. 557, 562-63 , 111 So.2d 771, 773 (1959). 2013Segall Co. v. Trahan, 290 So.2d 854, 858 (La. 1974); Merritt v. Hays, 237 La. 557, 562-63 , 111 So.2d 771, 773 (1959). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Coussons v. Smythe
neutral
2 sentences1961The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. 1956The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. | 4 | 1940–1961 |
Metcalfe v. Green
green
2 sentences1961The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. 1961The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. | 4 | 1940–1961 |
Crais v. Castaing
neutral
2 sentences1961The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. 1961The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. | 4 | 1940–1961 |
White v. Myane
green
2 sentences1961The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. 1961The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error (Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La. 950 , 74 So. 261 ; White v. Myane, 10 La.App. 195 , 120 So. 650 ; Crais v. Castaing, 13 La.App. 395 , 128 So. 300 ; Coussons v. Smythe, La.App., 178 So. 657 ), and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proof. | 4 | 1940–1961 |
Ferguson v. Belcher and Son
green
2 sentences2011In Ferguson v. Belcher and Son, 230 La. 422 , 88 So.2d 806 (1956), the Court indicated that “the burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error, and he must carry said burden by clear, and the strongest possible proof.” Id. 2011In Ferguson v. Belcher and Son, 230 La. 422 , 88 So.2d 806 (1956), the Court indicated that “the burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error, and he must carry said burden by clear, and the strongest possible proof.” Id. | 3 | 2006–2011 |
Bonadona v. Guccione
green
2 sentences2011This requirement was modified in Bonadona v. Guccione, 362 So.2d 740 (La.1978), which held that the clear and convincing evidence of mutual mistake was necessary only when a party seeks to prove that the insurer had insured a substantially different and greater risk than that expressed by the written policy. 2008This requirement was modified in Bonadona v. Guccione, 362 So.2d 740 (La.1978), which held that the clear and convincing evidence of mutual mistake was necessary only when a party seeks to prove that the insurer had insured a substantially different and greater risk than that expressed by the written policy. | 3 | 2006–2011 |
Dickson v. Dickson
neutral
2 sentences1961Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 *92 La. 311; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La. 1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 3 | 1940–1961 |
Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Kinder Canal Co. v. Louisiana Tax Commission
green
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1940Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Waller v. Colvin
green
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman
green
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1940Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Ker v. Evershed
green
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1940Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Bryan v. Wisner
neutral
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1940Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Gladdish v. Godchaux
neutral
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1940Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Palangue v. Guesnon
neutral
2 sentences1956Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . 1940Palangue v. Guesnon, 15 La. 311 ; Dickson v. Dickson, 36 La.Ann. 870 ; Ker v. Evershed, 41 La.Ann. 15 , 6 So. 566 ; Bryan v. Wisner, 44 La.Ann. 832 , 11 So. 290 ; Gladdish v. Godchaux, 46 La.Ann. 1571 , 16 So. 451 ; Chaffe v. Minden Lumber Co., 118 La. 753 , 43 So. 397 ; Waller v. Colvin, 151 La. 765 , 92 So. 328 ; and Nelson, Curtis & Nelson v. Bridgeman, 152 La. 190 , 92 So. 855 . | 2 | 1940–1956 |
Wilson v. Levy
green
2 sentences2013Concerning reformation, this Court has long held: ‘It is an established rule of law in our jurisprudence that ‘Either party is always permitted, in a suit between the parties to a contract, to correct any error in the instrument purporting to evidence the contract, so as to make it express truly and correctly the intention of the parties,’ * * * provided the rights of third parties have not intervened. * * * The error or mistake must be mutual. * * * The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error * * * and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proo 2013Concerning reformation, this Court has long held: ‘It is an established rule of law in our jurisprudence that ‘Either party is always permitted, in a suit between the parties to a contract, to correct any error in the instrument purporting to evidence the contract, so as to make it express truly and correctly the intention of the parties,’ * * * provided the rights of third parties have not intervened. * * * The error or mistake must be mutual. * * * The burden is on the one seeking the reformation to prove the error * * * and he must carry the burden by clear, and the strongest possible, proo | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.