Supreme Court addressed standard in Louisiana

12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2026 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Mimsgreen la · 1993 · cited in 2 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2009–2011 2 sentences 2011In State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059, 1059-60 (La.1993), the supreme court addressed this requirement, explaining: Under Article 881.1 Defendant must file a motion to reconsider and set forth the “specific grounds” upon which the motion is based in order to raise an objection to the sentence on appeal. 2009In State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059, 1059-60 (La.1993), the supreme court addressed this requirement, explaining: If the defendant does not allege any specific ground for excessiveness or present any argument or evidence not previously considered by the court at original sentencing, then the defendant does not lose the right to appeal the sentence; the defendant is simply relegated to having the appellate court consider the bare claim of excessiveness.	2	2
State v. Captvillegreen la · 1984 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2026–2026 1 sentence 2026See State v. Captville, 448 So.2d 676, 678 (La.1984).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (14)

Case	Cited	Years
State v. Blanton neutral la · 1981 2 sentences 2006State v. Varnell, 410 So.2d 1108 (1982); State v. Bickham, 404 602 So.2d 929 (La.1981); State v. Blanton, 400 So.2d 661 (La.1981); State v. Ault, 394 So.2d 1192 (La.1981). . . . 2004State v. Varnell, 410 So.2d 1108 (1982); State v. Bickham, 404 So.2d 929 (La.1981); State v. Blanton, 400 So.2d 661 (La.1981); State v. Ault, 394 So.2d 1192 (La.1981). * * In determining whether or not reasonable cause exists to temporarily detain a person, the totality of the circumstances, "the whole picture," must be considered.	2	2004–2006
State v. Thompson green la · 2003 2 sentences 2006La.C.Cr.P. art. 215.1 allows a police officer to "stop a person in a public place whom he reasonably suspects is committing, has committed, or is about to commit an offense, and may demand of him his name, address, and an explanation of his actions." In State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX pp. 5-6 (La.4/9/03), 842 So.2d 330, 335 , the Supreme Court addressed the standard for determining whether an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop: Reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop is something less than probable cause and must be determined under the specific facts of each 2004In State v. Thompson, XXXX-XXXX pp. 5-6 (La.4/9/03), 842 So.2d 330, 335 , the Supreme Court addressed the standard for *546 determining if an officer has reasonable suspicion to conduct an investigatory stop: Reasonable suspicion for an investigatory stop is something less than probable cause and must be determined under the specific facts of each case by whether the officer had sufficient knowledge of particular facts and circumstances to justify the infringement on individual's right to be free from governmental interference.	2	2004–2006
State v. Ault neutral la · 1981 2 sentences 2006State v. Varnell, 410 So.2d 1108 (1982); State v. Bickham, 404 602 So.2d 929 (La.1981); State v. Blanton, 400 So.2d 661 (La.1981); State v. Ault, 394 So.2d 1192 (La.1981). . . . 2004State v. Varnell, 410 So.2d 1108 (1982); State v. Bickham, 404 So.2d 929 (La.1981); State v. Blanton, 400 So.2d 661 (La.1981); State v. Ault, 394 So.2d 1192 (La.1981). * * In determining whether or not reasonable cause exists to temporarily detain a person, the totality of the circumstances, "the whole picture," must be considered.	2	2004–2006
State v. Varnell green la · 1982 2 sentences 2006State v. Varnell, 410 So.2d 1108 (1982); State v. Bickham, 404 602 So.2d 929 (La.1981); State v. Blanton, 400 So.2d 661 (La.1981); State v. Ault, 394 So.2d 1192 (La.1981). . . . 2004State v. Varnell, 410 So.2d 1108 (1982); State v. Bickham, 404 So.2d 929 (La.1981); State v. Blanton, 400 So.2d 661 (La.1981); State v. Ault, 394 So.2d 1192 (La.1981). * * In determining whether or not reasonable cause exists to temporarily detain a person, the totality of the circumstances, "the whole picture," must be considered.	2	2004–2006
Jackson v. Virginia red scotus · 1979 2 sentences 2026ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER ONE: In his first assignment of error, Defendant claims the evidence presented at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was insufficient to find him guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. 5 Standard of Review In State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 5–7 (La. 12/1/04), 888 So.2d 798 , 801–02 (alterations in original), the supreme court addressed the standard of review for claims raising sufficiency of the evidence and stated, as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate cou 2026ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER ONE: In his first assignment of error, Defendant claims the evidence presented at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was insufficient to find him guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. 5 Standard of Review In State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 5–7 (La. 12/1/04), 888 So.2d 798 , 801–02 (alterations in original), the supreme court addressed the standard of review for claims raising sufficiency of the evidence and stated, as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate cou	1	2026–2026
State v. Major green la · 2004 1 sentence 2026ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR NUMBER ONE: In his first assignment of error, Defendant claims the evidence presented at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, was insufficient to find him guilty of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt. 5 Standard of Review In State v. Major, 03-3522, pp. 5–7 (La. 12/1/04), 888 So.2d 798 , 801–02 (alterations in original), the supreme court addressed the standard of review for claims raising sufficiency of the evidence and stated, as follows: When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, Louisiana appellate cou	1	2026–2026
State v. Hall green la · 2012 1 sentence 2018The supreme court addressed a claim of double jeopardy in State v. Hall , 12-0601 (La. 6/29/12), 91 So.3d 302 , 303 ( per curiam ), where, like the present case, a defendant was charged with multiple crimes in a single prosecution.	1	2018–2018
Watson v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Ins. Co. green la · 1985 1 sentence 2017Co., 469 So.2d 967 (La.1985), the supreme court addressed the factors to be considered in an appellate review of an allocation of fault.	1	2017–2017
Reed v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. green la · 1998 2 sentences 2011In Reed, supra, the Supreme Court addressed the standard of appellate review for a trial court’s determination of whether a condition of the thing or property presents an unreasonable risk of harm. 2011In Reed, supra , the Supreme Court addressed the standard of appellate review for a trial court's determination of whether a condition of the thing or property presents an unreasonable risk of harm.	1	2011–2011
Sher v. Lafayette Ins. Co. green la · 2008 1 sentence 2011In Slier, 988 So.2d 186 , the supreme court addressed a claim arising from damages incurred in August 2005 from the effects of Hurricane Katrina.	1	2011–2011
Lenard v. Dilley green la · 2002 1 sentence 2004In Lenard v. Dilley, 01-1522 (La.1/15/02), 805 So.2d 175 , the supreme court addressed the standard of care set forth in subsection D of Louisiana's emergency vehicle statute stating that: La.Rev.Stat. 32:24(D) sets out two standards of care for an emergency vehicle drivers depending on the circumstances of the case.	1	2004–2004
State v. Bickham green la · 1981 1 sentence 2004State v. Varnell, 410 So.2d 1108 (1982); State v. Bickham, 404 So.2d 929 (La.1981); State v. Blanton, 400 So.2d 661 (La.1981); State v. Ault, 394 So.2d 1192 (La.1981). * * * In determining whether or not reasonable cause exists to temporarily detain a person, the totality of the circumstances, "the whole picture," must be considered.	1	2004–2004
Schwegmann Brothers Giant Super Mkts. v. McCrory green la · 1959 1 sentence 1999In Schwegmann v. McCrory , 112 So.2d 606 (La. 1959) the Supreme Court addressed a challenge to Act 193 of 1958.	1	1999–1999
State v. Tanner green la · 1983 1 sentence 1994In State v. Tanner, 425 So.2d 760 (La.1983), the Supreme Court addressed the principle of detrimental reliance in terms of what evidence a defendant offers the State during the course of his cooperation.	1	1994–1994

Where else courts name it

IL 22 (1988–2024) LA 12 (1994–2026) TX 10 (1992–2021) CA 7 (2003–2025) NJ 6 (2006–2025) OH 5 (2000–2007) MS 5 (2005–2021) PA 5 (1987–2025) OR 5 (2005–2025) MI 4 (1988–2015) MN 4 (1986–2004) CO 4 (2002–2021) MD 3 (1997–2020) VA 3 (1991–2025) AL 3 (2002–2012) KY 2 (2011–2012) AR 2 (2023–2023) CT 2 (1991–1994) NY 2 (1996–1996) NH 2 (2011–2013) IN 2 (2003–2008) ID 2 (1992–2023)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check