12 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1908–2000 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Kellygreen2 sentences1996State v. Kelly, 851 S.W.2d 693, 697 (Mo.App. 1993State v. Kelly, 851 S.W.2d 693, 697 (Mo.App.1993); State v. Jackson, 809 S.W.2d 77, 81 (Mo.App.1991). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Jacksongreen2 sentences1993State v. Kelly, 851 S.W.2d 693, 697 (Mo.App.1993); State v. Jackson, 809 S.W.2d 77, 81 (Mo.App.1991). 1993State v. Jackson, 809 S.W.2d 77, 81 (Mo.App.1991). | 3 | 3 |
State v. Plummergreen2 sentences1996State v. Plummer, 860 S.W.2d 340, 345-46 (Mo.App. 1993). 1994“If a defendant fails to challenge the state’s explanation in the trial court, the defendant may not challenge the state’s explanation on appeal.” State v. Plummer, 860 S.W.2d 340, 346 (Mo.App.E.D.1993). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Wrightgreen1 sentence2000Wright, 972 S.W.2d at 307 (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. MacKgreen1 sentence1998State v. Mack, 903 S.W.2d 623, 629 (Mo.App.1995). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Fritzgreen1 sentence1996State v. Fritz, 913 S.W.2d 941, 946 (Mo.App.1996). | 1 | 1 |
M. F. A. Cooperative Ass'n of Mansfield v. Murraygreen1 sentence1972Cooperative Ass’n of Mansfield v. Murray, Mo.App., 365 S.W.2d 279, 289 [16-18]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Morrison v. Yancey
neutral
1 sentence1927In such case the statute provides for the assessment of damages, value of the property and summary judgment for the plaintiff against the principal and sureties on the replevin bond. *577 Section 2090 makes tlie following provisions: “If in any case it shall become necessary to sue upon any bond given in virtue of this article, the same may be done by civil action against the obligors, jointly or severally, in the name of the party to whom the bond was given.” In the case of Morrison v. Yancey, 23 Mo. App. 670, 673 , it is held: “It was the plaintiff who by his own action prevented an assessme | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Gulath v. Waldstein
neutral
1 sentence1908A judgment in replevin should be in the alternative where it is against the party having the possession (Cobbey on Replevin (2 Ed.), section 1105), and it should give the alternatives prescribed by the statute. [Gulath v. Waldstein, 7 Mo. App. 66 .] But where, as here, the verdict is proper, an irregular judgment may be corrected by the appellate court and should not be treated as an error compelling a retrial of the cause. [Cobbey on Replevin, section 1089.] Accordingly the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment on the verdict in conformity with the stat | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.