12 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co.green2 sentences1997The evidence is circumstantial, but “the existence of only circumstantial evidence on a material issue is no bar to recovery of and by itself.” Vaughan v. Taft Broadcasting Co., 708 S.W.2d 656, 661 (Mo.banc 1986). 1997Although the evidence is purely circumstantial, “the existence of only circumstantial evidence on a material issue is no bar to recovery of and by itself.” Vaughn v. Taft Broadcasting Co., 708 S.W.2d 656, 661 (Mo. bane 1986). | 5 | 5 |
McCarthy v. Wulffgreen2 sentences1986McCarthy v. Wulff, 452 S.W.2d 164, 168 (Mo.1970). 1981McCarthy v. Wulff, 452 S.W.2d 164,168 (Mo.1970). | 2 | 2 |
Birdsong v. Christiansgreen2 sentences2017Co., 708 S.W.2d 656, 661 (Mo. banc 1986). “ ‘Intent is in nearly every case proven by circumstantial evidence[.]’ ” Birdsong v. Christians, 6 S.W.3d 218, 226 (Mo. App. 1999) (quoting Wagner v. Uffman, 885 S.W.2d 783, 786 (Mo. App. 1994)). 2000On account of this, the courts are more liberal in allowing the questions of the negligence of the defendant and of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff to go to the jury upon slight evidence. *139 “We observe that ‘the existence of only circumstantial evidence on a material issue is no bar to recovery of and by itself.’ ” Birdsong, 6 S.W.3d at 226 (quoting Martin v. McNeill, 957 S.W.2d 360, 363 (Mo.App.1997)). | 1 | 2 |
Martin v. McNeillgreen2 sentences2000On account of this, the courts are more liberal in allowing the questions of the negligence of the defendant and of the contributory negligence of the plaintiff to go to the jury upon slight evidence. *139 “We observe that ‘the existence of only circumstantial evidence on a material issue is no bar to recovery of and by itself.’ ” Birdsong, 6 S.W.3d at 226 (quoting Martin v. McNeill, 957 S.W.2d 360, 363 (Mo.App.1997)). 1999We observe that “the existence of only circumstantial evidence on a material issue is no bar to recovery of and by itself.” Martin, 957 S.W.2d at 363 . | 1 | 2 |
Wagner v. Uffmangreen1 sentence2017Co., 708 S.W.2d 656, 661 (Mo. banc 1986). “ ‘Intent is in nearly every case proven by circumstantial evidence[.]’ ” Birdsong v. Christians, 6 S.W.3d 218, 226 (Mo. App. 1999) (quoting Wagner v. Uffman, 885 S.W.2d 783, 786 (Mo. App. 1994)). | 1 | 1 |
Strong v. American Cyanamid Co.green1 sentence2017See Strong, 261 S.W.3d at 511 (“Generally, the fact that only circumstantial evidence is presented on a material issue is no bar to recovery.” However, “[t]he proof must be realistically tailored to the circumstances and the-existence of a defect may be inferred from circumstantial evidence with or without the aid of expert evidence.”). | 1 | 1 |
Sanders v. Hartville Milling Co.green2 sentences2008Generally, “[t]he fact that only circumstantial evidence is presented on a material issue is no bar to recovery.” Sanders v. Hartville Milling Co., 14 S.W.3d 188, 200 (Mo.App. 2008Generally, "[t]he fact that only circumstantial evidence is presented on a material issue is no bar to recovery." Sanders v. Hartville Milling Co., 14 S.W.3d 188, 200 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Resnik v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Missourigreen2 sentences2002Resnik v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Missouri, 912 S.W.2d 567, 570 (Mo.App. 2002Resnik v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Missouri, 912 S.W.2d 567, 570 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Whispering Oaks Farms, LLC v. Lebanon Livestock Auction S & T, LLC
green
1 sentence2017Whispering Oaks Farms, LLC, 466 S.W.3d at 719 . “[T]he existence of only circumstantial evidence on a material issue is no bar to recovery of and by itself.” Vaughan v. Taft Broad. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Dildine v. Frichtel
green
2 sentences1995As with any type of evidence, the circumstantial evidence must be “substantial”, Dildine, 890 S.W.2d at 685 , and it “must establish the desired inference with such certainty as to cause it to be the more reasonable and probable of the conclusions to be drawn.” Vaughan, 708 S.W.2d at 661 . 1995As *571 with any type of evidence, the circumstantial evidence must be "substantial", Dildine, 890 S.W.2d at 685 , and it "must establish the desired inference with such certainty as to cause it to be the more reasonable and probable of the conclusions to be drawn." Vaughan, 708 S.W.2d at 661 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.