12 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1916–1988 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Wright v. MERCURY INSURANCE COMPANYgreen2 sentences1963In Wright v. Mercury Insurance Co., 244 N.C. 361 , 93 S.E.2d 438 , the Court said: "The rule is well settled in this jurisdiction, and it seems to be the majority rule elsewhere, that, if the insured relies upon a waiver or an estoppel in pais or an equitable estoppel affecting the real and substantial merits of the matter in controversy and has an opportunity *875 to plead it, and the facts constituting a waiver or estoppel do not appear in the pleadings of the parties, he must specially plead it, and if he does not do so, evidence to prove it is not admissible over objection." (Citing numero 1963In Wright v. Mercury Insurance Co., 244 N.C. 361 , 93 S.E.2d 438 , the Court said: "The rule is well settled in this jurisdiction, and it seems to be the majority rule elsewhere, that, if the insured relies upon a waiver or an estoppel in pais or an equitable estoppel affecting the real and substantial merits of the matter in controversy and has an opportunity *875 to plead it, and the facts constituting a waiver or estoppel do not appear in the pleadings of the parties, he must specially plead it, and if he does not do so, evidence to prove it is not admissible over objection." (Citing numero | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Vick v. . Baker
neutral
2 sentences1954Winborne v. Johnson, 95 N.C. 46 ; Vick v. Baker, 122 N.C. 98 , 29 S.E. 64 ; Gaylord v. Berry, 169 N.C. 733 , 86 S.E. 623 . 1954Winborne v. Johnson, 95 N.C. 46 ; Vick v. Baker, 122 N.C. 98 , 29 S.E. 64 ; Gaylord v. Berry, 169 N.C. 733 , 86 S.E. 623 . | 3 | 1930–1954 |
Winborne v. . Johnson
neutral
2 sentences1954Winborne v. Johnson, 95 N.C. 46 ; Vick v. Baker, 122 N.C. 98 , 29 S.E. 64 ; Gaylord v. Berry, 169 N.C. 733 , 86 S.E. 623 . 1930Winborne v. Johnson, 95 N. C., 46 ; Vick v. Baker, 122 N. C., 98 , 29 S. E., 64 ; Gaylord v. Berry, 169 N. C., 733 , 86 S. E., 623 . | 3 | 1930–1954 |
Gaylord v. . Berry
neutral
2 sentences1954Winborne v. Johnson, 95 N.C. 46 ; Vick v. Baker, 122 N.C. 98 , 29 S.E. 64 ; Gaylord v. Berry, 169 N.C. 733 , 86 S.E. 623 . 1954Winborne v. Johnson, 95 N.C. 46 ; Vick v. Baker, 122 N.C. 98 , 29 S.E. 64 ; Gaylord v. Berry, 169 N.C. 733 , 86 S.E. 623 . | 3 | 1930–1954 |
Lassiter v. . Roper
neutral
2 sentences1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 | 2 | 1916–1958 |
Pope v. . Andrews
neutral
2 sentences1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 1916Pope v. Andrews, 90 N. C., 401 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 103 N. C., 642 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N. C., 17 . | 2 | 1916–1958 |
Watson Seafood & Poultry Co. v. George W. Thomas, Inc.
green
2 sentences1988Poultry Co., 289 N.C. at 15 , 220 S.E. 2d at 542 . 1988Poultry Co., 289 N.C. at 15 , 220 S.E. 2d at 542 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Lamb v. Staples
green
2 sentences1966Accord, Wright v. Insurance Co., 244 N.C. 361 , 93 S.E. 2d 438 ; Lamb v. Staples, 236 N.C. 179 , 72 S.E. 2d 219 . 1966Accord, Wright v. Insurance Co., 244 N.C. 361 , 93 S.E. 2d 438 ; Lamb v. Staples, 236 N.C. 179 , 72 S.E. 2d 219 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Hall v. Odom
green
2 sentences1966When the facts constituting a waiver do not appear in the pleadings, the party relying thereon must specially plead the defense, and it “must be pleaded with certainty and particularity and established by the greater weight of the evidence.” Hall v. Odom, 240 N.C. 66, 70 , 81 S.E. 2d 129, 133 . 1966When the facts constituting a waiver do not appear in the pleadings, the party relying thereon must specially plead the defense, and it “must be pleaded with certainty and particularity and established by the greater weight of the evidence.” Hall v. Odom, 240 N.C. 66, 70 , 81 S.E. 2d 129, 133 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Gaster v. Goodwin
neutral
2 sentences1965Gaster v. Goodwin, 259 N.C. 676 , 131 S.E. 2d 363 . 1965Gaster v. Goodwin, 259 N.C. 676 , 131 S.E. 2d 363 . | 1 | 1965–1965 |
Meece v. . Commercial Credit Co.
green
2 sentences1963Brown v. Hale, ante, 480; Meece v. Commercial Credit Co., 201 N.C. 139 , 159 S.E. 17 ; Sutherland v. McLean, supra. The learned judge below undoubtedly had in mind the long line of cases, of which those next above cited are representative. 1963Brown v. Hale, ante, 480; Meece v. Commercial Credit Co., 201 N.C. 139 , 159 S.E. 17 ; Sutherland v. McLean, supra. The learned judge below undoubtedly had in mind the long line of cases, of which those next above cited are representative. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Pipes v. North Carolina Mica Mineral & Lumber Co.
neutral
2 sentences1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Citizens National Bank v. Gaston Farmers' Union Warehouse Co.
neutral
1 sentence1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Jackson v. . Thomas
neutral
2 sentences1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Turner v. . Shuffler
neutral
1 sentence1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Turner v. Shuffler
neutral
1 sentence1958When the facts showing the lapse of time are pleaded, the pleader becomes entitled to the benefit of the plea as a matter of law. *324 “ . . . the plea is not good if it merely states that the party pleads the statute of limitations ... he must go further and state the facts constituting the defense.” Bank v. Warehouse, 172 N.C. 602 ; Jackson v. Thomas, 211 N.C. 634 , 191 S.E. 327 ; Pipes v. Lumber Co., 132 N.C. 612 , 44 S.E. 114 ; Lassiter v. Roper, 114 N.C. 17 , 18 S.E. 946 ; Turner v. Shuffler, 108 N.C. 642 , 13 S.E. 243 ; Pope v. Andrews, 90 N.C. 401 ; McIntosh on Practice and Procedure, 2 | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Pioneer Manufacturing Co. v. Phœnix Assurance Co.
neutral
2 sentences1956Manufacturing Co. v. Assurance Co., 110 N.C. 176 , 14 S.E. 731 , 28 Am. 1956Manufacturing Co. v. Assurance Co., 110 N.C. 176 , 14 S.E. 731 , 28 Am. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Norton v. . McLaurin
green
1 sentence1920Stockton v. Gold Mining Co., 144 N. C., 595 ; Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N. C., 185 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Stockton v. Wolverine Gold Mining Co.
neutral
1 sentence1920Stockton v. Gold Mining Co., 144 N. C., 595 ; Norton v. McLaurin, 125 N. C., 185 . | 1 | 1920–1920 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.