12 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1954–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Robinsongreen1 sentence2025Ordinarily, when a party fails to raise an issue to the trial judge, we "will decline to consider" those questions "unless the questions so raised on appeal go to the jurisdiction of the trial court or concern matters of great public interest." Zaman v. Felton, 219 N.J. 199, 226-27 (2014) (quoting State v. Robinson, 200 N.J. 1, 20 (2009)). | 1 | 1 |
Tahir Zaman v. Barbara Felton (072128)green1 sentence2025Ordinarily, when a party fails to raise an issue to the trial judge, we "will decline to consider" those questions "unless the questions so raised on appeal go to the jurisdiction of the trial court or concern matters of great public interest." Zaman v. Felton, 219 N.J. 199, 226-27 (2014) (quoting State v. Robinson, 200 N.J. 1, 20 (2009)). | 1 | 1 |
Cohen v. Bd. of Adjustment of Borough of Rumsongreen1 sentence2019Because the Board must consider the existing structure on the DeCiccos' property as approved by the Township Building Department and the Township Construction Office by its issuance of the CO in 2010, the judge agreed "that the peculiar condition of the property was not 'self-created' in the sense that it should bar the granting of a variance." See Cohen v. Bd of Adjustment of Borough of Rumson, 396 N.J. | 1 | 1 |
ISKOS. v. Planning Bd. of Tp. of Livingstongreen1 sentence2018Plaintiff cites Isko v. Planning Board of 33 A-0206-15T1 Township of Livingston, 51 N.J. 162, 174 (1968), overruled in part by Lang, 160 N.J. 41 , for the proposition that when a property is similar to other properties in the zone, it should not be given a hardship exception pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(c)(1). | 1 | 1 |
Brace v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2007See Brace v. United States, 72 Fed. | 1 | 1 |
Gougeon v. BOROUGH OF STONE HARBORgreen2 sentences1984We cautioned, however, in Gougeon v. Borough of Stone Harbor, 52 N.J. 212, 224 (1968), that: Of course, no offer to purchase should play any part in the consideration of the case unless it represents at least the fair market value of a * * * lot on which a home could be built * * *. 1984We cautioned, however, in Gougeon v. Borough of Stone Harbor, 52 N.J. 212, 224 (1968), that: *107 Of course, no offer to purchase should play any part in the consideration of the case unless it represents at least the fair market value of a * * * lot on which a home could be built * * *. | 1 | 1 |
Ward v. Scottgreen1 sentence1954We determined, however, that there were insufficient findings under subsection (d) and, accordingly, remanded the cause to the board for "reconsideration, findings and recommendation to the town council." See 11 N.J. 117, 129 (1952). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lang v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
green
2 sentences2026Id. at 54 . 2018Plaintiff cites Isko v. Planning Board of 33 A-0206-15T1 Township of Livingston, 51 N.J. 162, 174 (1968), overruled in part by Lang, 160 N.J. 41 , for the proposition that when a property is similar to other properties in the zone, it should not be given a hardship exception pursuant to N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70(c)(1). | 5 | 2017–2026 |
State v. Brimage
green
1 sentence2018He argues the police lacked a reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle, lacked 1 State v. Brimage, 153 N.J. 1 (1998). 2 Defendant retained the right to argue for a parole ineligibility period of two years and four months, and a hardship waiver of his driver's license suspension. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Davis Enterprises v. Karpf
green
2 sentences2006In that respect, the issues in the two matters are not identical because a hardship waiver is granted upon a finding of “exceptional and undue hardship,” N.J.AC. 7:13-4.8(d)l. *61 Although the regulation itself does not define hardship, we agree with the statement made in a related context that a claimed undue hardship “need not result in the inability to make any use of the property.” Davis Enters, v. Karpf, 105 N.J. 476, 493 , 523 A.2d 137 (1987) (Stein, J., concurring). 2006In that respect, the issues in the two matters are not identical because a hardship waiver is granted upon a finding of “exceptional and undue hardship,” N.J.AC. 7:13-4.8(d)l. *61 Although the regulation itself does not define hardship, we agree with the statement made in a related context that a claimed undue hardship “need not result in the inability to make any use of the property.” Davis Enters, v. Karpf, 105 N.J. 476, 493 , 523 A.2d 137 (1987) (Stein, J., concurring). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State v. Thomas
green
1 sentence2006Accordingly, the panel determined that the measure of value was not “the prohibited uses as building lots, but rather the value for the permitted uses as parkland, open space or a parking lot.” We granted Mansoldo’s petition for certification. 185 N.J. 297 , 884 A.2d 1267 (2005). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Harrington Glen, Inc. v. Municipal Board of Adjustment
green
2 sentences1984Commencing with Justice Francis’ decision in Harrington Glen, Inc., supra, 52 N.J. at 30 , we have discussed the possibility that the opportunity of an owner to sell property at a fair price may preclude application of the hardship exception under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70 c. 1984Commencing with Justice Francis' decision in Harrington Glen, Inc., supra, 52 N.J. at 30 , we have discussed the possibility that the opportunity of an owner to sell property at a fair price may preclude application of the hardship exception under N.J.S.A. 40:55D-70 c. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.