12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Simpson Tacoma Kraft Co. v. Department of Ecologygreen2 sentences2017See Sim son Tacoma Kraft Co. v. De 't of Ecolo , 119 Wn.2d 640,647 , 835 P.2d 1030 (1992)(adoption of statewide numeric water quality standard for discharge of a - 16 - No. 75559-5-1/17 There was no error. 2017See Sim son Tacoma Kraft Co. v. De 't of Ecolo , 119 Wn.2d 640,647 , 835 P.2d 1030 (1992)(adoption of statewide numeric water quality standard for discharge of a - 16 - No. 75559-5-1/17 There was no error. | 1 | 1 |
City of Vancouver v. Public Employment Relations Commissiongreen1 sentence2016However, “‘it is axiomatic that [f]or rule making procedures to apply, an agency action or inaction must fall into the APA definition of a rule.’ ” City of Vancouver, 180 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Failor's Pharmacy v. Department of Social & Health Services
green
2 sentences2014But, as the Supreme Court has noted, “it is axiomatic that ‘[f]or rule making procedures to apply, an agency action or inaction must fall into the APA definition of a rule.’ ” Budget Rent A Car Corp. v. Dep’t of Licensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 895 , 31 P.3d 1174 (2001) (alteration in original) (quoting Failor’s Pharmacy, 125 Wn.2d at 493 ). ¶58 The APA defines both rules, the products of agency rule making, and orders, the products of adjudicatory proceedings. 2014But, as the Supreme Court has noted, " it is axiomatic that `[ f]or rule making procedures to apply, an agency action or inaction must fall into the APA definition of a rule."' Budget Rent -a -Car Corp. v. Dep' t ofLicensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 895 , 31 P.3d 1174 2001 ) ( quoting Failor' s Pharm., 125 Wn.2d at 493 ). | 8 | 1997–2014 |
Budget Rent A Car Corp. v. Department of Licensing
green
2 sentences2014But, as the Supreme Court has noted, “it is axiomatic that ‘[f]or rule making procedures to apply, an agency action or inaction must fall into the APA definition of a rule.’ ” Budget Rent A Car Corp. v. Dep’t of Licensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 895 , 31 P.3d 1174 (2001) (alteration in original) (quoting Failor’s Pharmacy, 125 Wn.2d at 493 ). ¶58 The APA defines both rules, the products of agency rule making, and orders, the products of adjudicatory proceedings. 2014But, as the Supreme Court has noted, " it is axiomatic that `[ f]or rule making procedures to apply, an agency action or inaction must fall into the APA definition of a rule."' Budget Rent -a -Car Corp. v. Dep' t ofLicensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 895 , 31 P.3d 1174 2001 ) ( quoting Failor' s Pharm., 125 Wn.2d at 493 ). | 4 | 2014–2018 |
Budget Rent a Car Corp. v. STATE, DOL
green
2 sentences2014But, as the Supreme Court has noted, “it is axiomatic that ‘[f]or rule making procedures to apply, an agency action or inaction must fall into the APA definition of a rule.’ ” Budget Rent A Car Corp. v. Dep’t of Licensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 895 , 31 P.3d 1174 (2001) (alteration in original) (quoting Failor’s Pharmacy, 125 Wn.2d at 493 ). ¶58 The APA defines both rules, the products of agency rule making, and orders, the products of adjudicatory proceedings. 2014But, as the Supreme Court has noted, " it is axiomatic that `[ f]or rule making procedures to apply, an agency action or inaction must fall into the APA definition of a rule."' Budget Rent -a -Car Corp. v. Dep' t ofLicensing, 144 Wn.2d 889, 895 , 31 P.3d 1174 2001 ) ( quoting Failor' s Pharm., 125 Wn.2d at 493 ). | 4 | 2014–2018 |
Providence Physician Services Co. v. Department of Health
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.