12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re the Marriage of Steelegreen2 sentences2013Stated differently, a party waives the claim oflack of personal jurisdiction by "consent[ing], expressly or impliedly, to the court's exercising jurisdiction." In re Marriage ofSteele, 90 Wn. 2013Stated differently, a party waives the claim of lack of personal jurisdiction by “consenting], expressly or impliedly, to the court’s exercising jurisdiction.” In re Marriage of Steele, 90 Wn. | 1 | 7 |
Edwards v. Le Ducgreen1 sentence2018App. at 672 . 8 Edwards v. Le Duc, 157 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Worden v. Smithgreen1 sentence2016There, Division Three held that "a party waives the claim of lack of 16 CP at 318 (boldface omitted). 12 No. 73716-3-1/13 personal jurisdiction by 'consenting], expressly or impliedly, to the court's exercising jurisdiction.'" Worden. 178 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Cole v. HARVEYLAND, LLCgreen1 sentence2013App. 388, 393 , 30 P.3d 529 (court has subject matter jurisdiction when it has authority "to adjudicate the type of controversy involved in the action"); see also Cole v. Harvevland LLC. 163 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Dress v. Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence2013The Supreme Court in Flint determined the 2007 statute was triggered based upon the date Corrections. 168 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
King v. Snohomish County
green
1 sentence2025A defendant also waives the defense if “(1) assertion of the defense is inconsistent with [the] defendant’s prior behavior or (2) the defendant has been dilatory in asserting the defense.” King v. Snohomish County, 146 Wn.2d 420, 424 , 47 P.3d 563 (2002). 5 “A party does not waive a claim of lack of personal jurisdiction by not appearing, by failing to obtain a jurisdictional ruling before trial, or by complying with parts of a decree that the court had jurisdiction to enter.” Steele, 90 Wn. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Harvey v. Obermeit
green
1 sentence2025However, a party waives the defense of insufficient service if they do not assert it in a “responsive pleading or motion under CR 12(b)(5).” Id. at 323 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
City of Seattle v. Gellein
green
1 sentence2025However, a party waives a claim of lack of personal jurisdiction if it is not “pleaded in the answer or in a pretrial motion to dismiss.” Sutton v. Hirvonen, 113 Wn.2d 1, 5 , 775 P.2d 448 (1989); CR 12(b), (h)(1). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
King v. Snohomish County
green
1 sentence2025A defendant also waives the defense if “(1) assertion of the defense is inconsistent with [the] defendant’s prior behavior or (2) the defendant has been dilatory in asserting the defense.” King v. Snohomish County, 146 Wn.2d 420, 424 , 47 P.3d 563 (2002). 5 “A party does not waive a claim of lack of personal jurisdiction by not appearing, by failing to obtain a jurisdictional ruling before trial, or by complying with parts of a decree that the court had jurisdiction to enter.” Steele, 90 Wn. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Sutton v. Hirvonen
green
1 sentence2025However, a party waives a claim of lack of personal jurisdiction if it is not “pleaded in the answer or in a pretrial motion to dismiss.” Sutton v. Hirvonen, 113 Wn.2d 1, 5 , 775 P.2d 448 (1989); CR 12(b), (h)(1). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Phipps v. Sasser
green
2 sentences2020In Phipps v. Sasser, a personal injury case, we addressed when the privilege is waived, if not at filing. 74 Wn.2d 439, 445-46 , 445 P.2d 624 (1968). 2020In Phipps v. Sasser, a personal injury case, we addressed when the privilege is waived, if not at filing. 74 Wn.2d 439, 445-46 , 445 P.2d 624 (1968). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
American Express Centurion Bank v. Stratman
green
1 sentence2018CR 12(b)(6) provides that a party waives this defense by failing to raise it either in an 7 Stratman, 172 Wn. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In Re The Estate Of: Donald C. Muller
green
1 sentence2017In re Muller, 197 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In Re the Marriage of Parks
green
1 sentence2014In re Marriage ofParks, 48 Wn. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Shoop v. Kittitas County
green
1 sentence2013App. 388, 393 , 30 P.3d 529 (court has subject matter jurisdiction when it has authority "to adjudicate the type of controversy involved in the action"); see also Cole v. Harvevland LLC. 163 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Shoop v. Kittitas County
green
1 sentence2013App. 992, 997-98 , 957 P.2d 247 (1998) (a party waives the defense of lack of personal jurisdiction when he or she expressly or impliedly consents to the exercise of jurisdiction). 5 See Shoop v. Kittitas County, 108 Wn. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.