unobjected-to error (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

unobjected-to error in Idaho

82 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Perrygreen
idaho · 2010 · cited in 79 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2011–2019
2 sentences

2019In State v. Perry, 150 Idaho 209 , 245 P.3d 961 (2010), the Idaho Supreme Court conducted a comprehensive analysis of the fundamental error doctrine and the circumstances under which the review of an unobjected-to error is appropriate.

2019In State v. Perry, 150 Idaho 209 , 245 P.3d 961 (2010), the Idaho Supreme Court conducted a comprehensive analysis of the fundamental error doctrine and the circumstances under which the review of an unobjected-to error is appropriate.

979
State v. Rafael Galvangreen
idahoctapp · 2014 · cited in 2 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014
2 sentences

2014See also State v. Galvan, 156 Idaho 379, 381-82 , 326 P.3d 1029, 1031-32 (Ct.App.2014).

2014See also State v. Galvan, 156 Idaho 379, 381-82 , 326 P.3d 1029, 1031-32 (Ct.App.2014).

22
State v. Seversongreen
idaho · 2009 · cited in 1 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019Compare Severson, 147 Idaho at 710–11, 215 P.3d at 430–31 (three-prong test for requested jury instruction), with Perry, 150 Idaho at 221 , 245 P.3d at 973 (fundamental error test for unobjected-to jury instruction).

2019Compare Severson, 147 Idaho at 710–11, 215 P.3d at 430–31 (three-prong test for requested jury instruction), with Perry, 150 Idaho at 221 , 245 P.3d at 973 (fundamental error test for unobjected-to jury instruction).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Tyler Ray Carter green
idaho · 2013
2 sentences

2014Carter, 155 Idaho at 173-74 , 307 P.3d at 190-91 .

2014Carter, 155 Idaho at 173-74 , 307 P.3d at 190-91 .

22013–2014
Hoffman v. State green
idahoctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2019Hoffman , 153 Idaho at 903 -905 , 277 P.3d at 1055 -57 .

2019Hoffman , 153 Idaho at 903 -905 , 277 P.3d at 1055 -57 .

12019–2019
State v. Zichko green
idaho · 1996
2 sentences

2016Zichko, 129 Idaho at 263 , 923 P.2d at 970 .

2016Zichko, 129 Idaho at 263 , 923 P.2d at 970 .

12016–2016
State v. Rollins green
idahoctapp · 2011
2 sentences

2012Rollins, 152 Idaho at 110 , 266 P.3d at 1215 .

2012Rollins, 152 Idaho at 110 , 266 P.3d at 1215 .

12012–2012

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 19-2514 (10) ID § Idaho Code § 18-1401 (8) ID § Idaho Code § 18-2403 (7) ID § Idaho Code § 18-903 (7) ID § Idaho Code § 18-1508 (6) ID § Idaho Code § 19-2132 (6) ID § Idaho Code § 18-8004 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 19-2524 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 18-901 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 18-918 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 19-2522 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 49-1404 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

ID 82 (2011–2019) MN 68 (1988–2026) TX 43 (1986–2025) AZ 14 (1981–2024) WI 10 (1988–2024) OH 7 (2001–2026) MI 7 (1976–2023) MA 5 (1989–2018) KS 4 (1994–2025) IL 4 (1972–1993) FL 4 (2006–2026) MD 4 (2011–2026) CA 3 (1990–2020) NV 3 (2021–2022) NY 2 (1976–2000) CO 2 (2024–2025) IA 2 (2020–2020) DC 2 (2008–2014)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check