11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Missouri v. Seibertgreen2 sentences2006Whether Pitts was in custody and made statements to the police prior to the administration of the Miranda warnings is relevant to whether the trial court's suppression of Pitts' post- Miranda statements should be affirmed based on the Supreme Court's decision in Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 , 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004). 2006Whether Pitts was in custody and made statements to the police prior to the administration of the Miranda warnings is relevant to whether the trial court's suppression of Pitts' post- Miranda statements should be affirmed based on the Supreme Court's decision in Missouri v. Seibert, 542 U.S. 600 , 124 S.Ct. 2601 , 159 L.Ed.2d 643 (2004). | 2 | 3 |
Ramirez v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Id. at 575 . 2015Ramirez v. State, 739 So.2d 568, 575 (Fla.1999). | 1 | 3 |
Ross v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Id. at 424. | 1 | 1 |
Rigterink v. Stategreen2 sentences2011See id. at 253-60 . 2011See id. at 253-60 . | 1 | 1 |
WM v. Stategreen1 sentence1999Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Fare, 442 U.S. at 724 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; W.M. v. State, 585 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Oregon v. Elstad
green
2 sentences2003Relying on Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 310-11 , 105 S.Ct. 1285 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), the majority in this case holds that the administration of the Miranda warnings and Davis's waiver of his rights to remain silent and to counsel during questioning insulate the subsequent confession from the circumstances that rendered inadmissible the unwarned confession made minutes earlier. 2003Relying on Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 310-11 , 105 S.Ct. 1285 , 84 L.Ed.2d 222 (1985), the majority in this case holds that the administration of the Miranda warnings and Davis's waiver of his rights to remain silent and to counsel during questioning insulate the subsequent confession from the circumstances that rendered inadmissible the unwarned confession made minutes earlier. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Roman v. State
green
2 sentences2000Lukehart next alleges that Lieutenant Redmond used the so-called "Christian burial technique" of interrogation, which this Court found in Roman v. State, 475 So.2d 1228 (Fla.1985), to be "unquestionably a blatantly coercive and deceptive ploy." Id. at 1232 . 2000Lukehart next alleges that Lieutenant Redmond used the so-called "Christian burial technique" of interrogation, which this Court found in Roman v. State, 475 So.2d 1228 (Fla.1985), to be "unquestionably a blatantly coercive and deceptive ploy." Id. at 1232 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1999Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Fare, 442 U.S. at 724 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; W.M. v. State, 585 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). 1999Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Fare, 442 U.S. at 724 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; W.M. v. State, 585 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Colorado v. Connelly
green
2 sentences1999Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Fare, 442 U.S. at 724 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; W.M. v. State, 585 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). 1999Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Fare, 442 U.S. at 724 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; W.M. v. State, 585 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Fare v. Michael C.
green
2 sentences1999Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Fare, 442 U.S. at 724 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; W.M. v. State, 585 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). 1999Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157, 167 , 107 S.Ct. 515 , 93 L.Ed.2d 473 (1986); Fare, 442 U.S. at 724 , 99 S.Ct. 2560 ; Miranda, 384 U.S. at 475 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 ; W.M. v. State, 585 So.2d 979, 981 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.