party cannot claim in Florida

2024See Held v. Held, 617 So. 2d 358, 356-60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (holding the husband could not complain that the trial court “lacked authority to award the wife child support ‘in advance’ by sequestering his share of the equity in the marital home,” where “his attorney suggested that option to the court”: “A party cannot claim as error on appeal that which he invited or introduced below.”); Althouse v. Palm Beach Cnty.

2012See Held v. Held, 617 So.2d 358, 360 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993) (“A party cannot claim as error on appeal that which he invited or introduced below.” (citations omitted)).

1999See, e.g., Henderson v. Antonacci, 62 So.2d 5, 8 (Fla.1952) ("It is a well established principle that the courts will not declare an act of the legislature unconstitutional unless its constitutionality is challenged directly by one who demonstrates that he is, or assuredly will be, affected adversely by it.").

1999See, e.g., Henderson v. Antonacci, 62 So.2d 5, 8 (Fla.1952) (“It is a well established principle that the courts will not declare an act of the legislature unconstitutional unless its constitutionality is challenged directly by one who demonstrates that he is, or assuredly will be, affected adversely by it.”).

1993See Spain v. State, 475 So.2d 944, 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and Pope v. State, 441 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1984).

1985Pope v. State, 441 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1984).

2024Sheriff's Off., 89 So. 3d 288, 289 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (declining to reverse based on trial court’s failure to conduct an in camera inspection of the requested public records where the petitioner “invited the trial court's ruling by arguing against an in camera inspection and asserting that one would not be necessary”); Philip J.

2021See, e.g., Fuller v. Palm Auto Plaza, Inc., 683 So. 2d 654, 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (“A party cannot claim as error on appeal that which he invited or introduced below.”).

2005Orgs. v. McAdory, 325 U.S. 472, 475 , 65 S.Ct. 1395 , 89 L.Ed. 1741 (1945) (stating that the Court will not pass upon the constitutionality of legislation when the party bringing the suit cannot assert antagonistic rights); State v. Benitez, 395 So.2d 514, 517 (Fla.1981) (stating that a party cannot challenge a statutory enactment that does not adversely affect that party's personal or property rights); Chamberlin v. Dade County Bd. of Pub.

2005Instruction, 171 So.2d 535, 537 (Fla.1965) (holding that parents who brought suit challenging certain religiously-related practices in public schools were without standing to challenge religious practices at baccalaureate programs because their children, who were enrolled in elementary schools, were not adversely affected by the challenged practice); Alachua County v. Scharps, 855 So.2d 195, 201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (stating that a party who is not adversely affected by the statute he or she seeks to challenge does not have standing).

2005Instruction, 171 So.2d 535, 537 (Fla.1965) (holding that parents who brought suit challenging certain religiously-related practices in public schools were without standing to challenge religious practices at baccalaureate programs because their children, who were enrolled in elementary schools, were not adversely affected by the challenged practice); Alachua County v. Scharps, 855 So.2d 195, 201 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (stating that a party who is not adversely affected by the statute he or she seeks to challenge does not have standing).

2001Pascual v. Dozier, 771 So.2d 552, 554 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) ("However, plaintiff failed to conduct any discovery of either IME doctor.

1993See Spain v. State, 475 So.2d 944, 946 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), and Pope v. State, 441 So.2d 1073 (Fla. 1984).