11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Glaubius v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Further, under the statute, the State must establish these factors by a preponderance of the evidence.” Dagerath v. State, 100 So.3d 1260, 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla. 1997)). 2012Further, under the statute, the State must establish these factors by a preponderance of the evidence.” Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla.1997) (citations omitted). | 3 | 4 |
Dagerath v. Stategreen1 sentence2017Further, under the statute, the State must establish these factors by a preponderance of the evidence.” Dagerath v. State, 100 So.3d 1260, 1263 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012) (quoting Glaubius v. State, 688 So.2d 913, 915 (Fla. 1997)). | 1 | 1 |
Schuette v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Our supreme court “has equated the ‘significant relationship’ test with the requirement of proximate causation between the criminal act and the resulting damages because the Court has required both a ‘but for’ causation requirement and a ‘significant relationship’ requirement.” Schuette v. State, 822 So.2d 1275, 1282 (Fla.2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hubbard v. State
green
2 sentences2011Id. 2011Id. | 2 | 2010–2011 |
Russell v. State
green
1 sentence2009Id. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Murphy v. State
green
2 sentences2009Id. at 1033 . 2009Id. at 1033 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Ensor v. State
green
1 sentence2005However, the Florida Supreme Court in Ensor v. State, 403 So.2d 349 (Fla.1981) distinguished the plain-view situation, which permits a warrantless seizure, from an open-view situation, which may not. [8] In the plain-view situation, the officer has a constitutional right to be in the place where the seizure is made. [9] In an open-view *1034 situation, the officer sees the contraband from a place he or she has a right to be, outside a constitutionally protected area, but may not have constitutional access to the place the contraband is located when seized. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Bradford
green
1 sentence2000State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); State v. Bradford, 658 So.2d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Pettis
green
1 sentence2000State v. Pettis, 520 So.2d 250 (Fla.1988); State v. Bradford, 658 So.2d 572 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Fex v. State
neutral
1 sentence1981Fex v. State, 386 So.2d 58 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.