11 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bateman v. Futchgreen2 sentences2004The father argues that the court erred in finding that he failed to develop and maintain a meaningful parental bond, contending that the mother refused to allow “any contact with the children for the preceding four (4) years and sought his incarceration for any attempted contact with her or the children.” He points to evidence that he was enjoined by the criminal court from having contact with the children since December 26, 1999 through and including the date of the termination hearing and that the mother “actively sought to keep the no contact provision in place to prevent [him] from any con 2004The father argues that the court erred in finding that he failed to develop and maintain a meaningful parental bond, contending that the mother refused to allow “any contact with the children for the preceding four (4) years and sought his incarceration for any attempted contact with her or the children.” He points to evidence that he was enjoined by the criminal court from having contact with the children since December 26, 1999 through and including the date of the termination hearing and that the mother “actively sought to keep the no contact provision in place to prevent [him] from any con | 2 | 2 |
White v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). 2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of B. B.green2 sentences2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e 2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of D. L. S.green1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of H. E. M. O.green1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of K. A. B.green1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of M. L.green1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of A. A.green1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of D. W.green1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of O. M. J.green1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.green2 sentences2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). 2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
In Re SHPgreen2 sentences2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). 2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of C. W. D.green2 sentences2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e 2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of R. C. M.green2 sentences2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e 2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
Hooks v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). 2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
In the Interest of A. H. P.green2 sentences2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e 2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
In Re Akgreen2 sentences2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e 2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 1 |
| In Re ARASgreen | 1 | 1 |
Miller v. Stategreen2 sentences2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). 2009See also Miller v. State, 285 Ga. 285, 286-287 , 676 S.E.2d 173 (2009). [31] White v. State, 293 Ga.App. 241, 242 (1), 666 S.E.2d 618 (2008). [32] See id. [33] See In the Interest of C.W.D., supra at 204-205(2), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [34] See In the Interest of S.H.P., 243 Ga.App. 720, 722 (1)(a), 534 S.E.2d 161 (2000). [35] (Citation omitted.) Hooks v. State, 280 Ga. 164, 165 (3), 626 S.E.2d 114 (2006). [36] See supra at 209(5), 501 S.E.2d 232 . [37] Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, 509 U.S. 579 , 113 S.Ct. 2786 , 125 L.Ed.2d 469 (1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Pdw
green
2 sentences2010DFCS was then required to show the third factor: "Such cause of deprivation is likely to continue or will not likely be remedied." OCGA § 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(iii). *885 As stated in P.D.W., 296 Ga. App. at 194 (1)(c), 674 S.E.2d 338 , "[t]his criterion focuses on whether, as of the date of the termination hearing, the parent is likely to continue conduct causing deprivation." Here, the mother argues that the juvenile court's finding that the deprivation was likely to continue was improperly based on past unfitness alone. 2010As stated in P.D.W., 296 Ga. App. at 194 (1)(c), 674 S.E.2d 338 , "[t]his criterion focuses on whether, as of the date of the termination hearing, the parent is likely to continue conduct causing deprivation." If over the intervening years since Kayla lost custody of the older children to DFCS, Kayla and John have not overcome the issues that led to the original and continued removal of the children, then a court could find that the parents will continue to so act in the future and therefore that the cause of the deprivation will likely continue. | 3 | 2009–2010 |
Andrew L. Parks, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank, West Georgia, N.A.
green
2 sentences2009The Department's attorney explained that "the only reason why it took two weeks [to be entered] was just to have it written down into the record[.]" Thus, the termination order reflected the juvenile court's intent to record a "previously unrecorded action actually taken or judgment actually rendered." Id. 2009The Department’s attorney explained that “the only reason why it took two weeks [to be entered] was just to have it written down into the record[.]” Thus, the termination order reflected the juvenile court’s intent to record a “previously unrecorded action actually taken or judgment actually rendered.” Id. | 2 | 2009–2009 |
In the Interest of A. M. V.
green
2 sentences1999Id. at 531 . 1999Id. at 531 , 474 S.E.2d 723 . | 2 | 1999–1999 |
In the INTEREST OF R. S. T., a Child.
green
1 sentence2022S. T., 345 Ga. App. 300 , 306 (1) ( 812 SE2d 614 ) (2018). 18 mental, emotional, or moral condition and needs of his or her child; and physical, mental, or emotional neglect of his or her child or evidence of past physical, mental, or emotional neglect by the parent of such child or another child of such parent.17 When making this determination when the child is not in the custody and care of his or her parent, the court must also consider whether the parent has significantly failed, without justifiable cause, for a period of six months prior to the date of the termination hearing: (1) To deve | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Re Aa
green
2 sentences2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e 2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In re T. W. O.
green
1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| In the Interest of J. A. green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| In Re Mlp green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Dw
green
1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| In Re Kab neutral | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Hemo
green
2 sentences2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e 2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Omj
green
1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Dls
green
1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Ja
green
1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
In Re Two
green
1 sentence2009NOTES [1] (Citation and punctuation omitted.) In the Interest of J.A., 286 Ga.App. 704 , 649 S.E.2d 882 (2007). [2] See OCGA §§ 15-11-2(8)(A); 15-11-94(b)(4)(A)(i), (B)(i). [3] Although Runo's report was marked as an exhibit at the hearing, it was not tendered into evidence. [4] Appellant was 24 years old on the date of the termination hearing. [5] The court granted appellant's motion for funds to retain this expert witness. [6] The court order issued an amended order on June 17, 2008, nunc pro tunc to February 12, 2008, to correct the statement in the March order that Runo's report had been e | 1 | 2009–2009 |
| In Re Ml green | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.