party has standing challenge in Georgia

11 Georgia opinions name it 1 courts 1986–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (16)

Case	Followed	Cited
Lambeth v. Stategreen ga · 1987 · cited in 5 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1989–2024 2 sentences 2024See Lambeth v. State, 257 Ga. 15, 16 ( 354 SE2d 144 ) (1987) (stating that “except where First Amendment rights are involved, a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse 22 For that matter, older caselaw articulates an even stronger rule that would seem to exclude facial challenges altogether: The courts will never blot out of existence a great police and moral enactment on the ground that parts of it are attacked as unconstitutional, in a general onslaught upon it all. 2024See Lambeth v. State, 257 Ga. 15, 16 ( 354 SE2d 144 ) (1987) (stating that “except where First Amendment rights are involved, a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse 22 For that matter, older caselaw articulates an even stronger rule that would seem to exclude facial challenges altogether: The courts will never blot out of existence a great police and moral enactment on the ground that parts of it are attacked as unconstitutional, in a general onslaught upon it all.	3	5
Agan v. Stategreen ga · 2000 · cited in 3 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2005–2024 2 sentences 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve	3	3
County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allengreen scotus · 1979 · cited in 3 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1986–2007 2 sentences 2007See, e.g., Bo Fancy Productions v. Rabun County Bd. of Commrs., 267 Ga. 341, 344 ( 478 SE2d 373 ) (1996) (applying United States Supreme Court’s relaxed standard of standing where statute attacked on First Amendment grounds); Lambeth v. State, supra, 257 Ga. at 16 , quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U. S. 140, 154-155 (99 SC 2213, 60 LE2d 777) (1979) (“a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse impact on [the party’s] own rights”); Aldridge, supra, 251 Ga. at 235 (1) (adopting three-part test for associational standing set 2006See, e.g., Lambeth v. State, 257 Ga. 15, 16 , 354 S.E.2d 144 (1987), quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140, 154-55 , 99 S.Ct. 2213 , 60 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979) ("a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute has an adverse impact on the party's own rights"); and South Georgia Natural Gas Co. v. Georgia Public Service Comm'n., 214 Ga. 174 , 104 S.E.2d 97 (1958), quoting Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. State of Missouri ex rel.	3	3
Reid v. Mayor of Eatontongreen ga · 1888 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve	2	2
Plumb v. Christiegreen ga · 1898 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve	2	2
Tennille v. Stategreen ga · 2005 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve	2	2
SONS OF CONFEDERATE VETERANS v. HENRY COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS (Two Cases)green ga · 2022 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 (1) ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“‘A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rig 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve	2	2
COBB COUNTY v. FLOAMgreen ga · 2024 · cited in 2 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve 2024See, e.g., Cobb County v. Floam, 319 Ga. 89, 92 (1) ( 901 SE2d 512 ) (2024) (it is “well settled that a court ‘will not listen to an objection made to the constitutionality of an act by a party whose rights it does not affect, and who has, therefore, no interest in defeating it.’”) (quoting Reid v. Mayor, etc. of Eatonton, 80 Ga. 755, 757 ( 6 SE 602 ) (1888) (citation and punctuation omitted)); SCV, 315 Ga. at 54 (2) (c) n.13 (citing cases); Tennille v. State, 279 Ga. 884, 885 (1) ( 622 SE2d 346 ) (2005) (“A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute adve	2	2
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commissiongreen scotus · 1977 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 1 sentence 2007See, e.g., Bo Fancy Productions v. Rabun County Bd. of Commrs., 267 Ga. 341, 344 ( 478 SE2d 373 ) (1996) (applying United States Supreme Court’s relaxed standard of standing where statute attacked on First Amendment grounds); Lambeth v. State, supra, 257 Ga. at 16 , quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U. S. 140, 154-155 (99 SC 2213, 60 LE2d 777) (1979) (“a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse impact on [the party’s] own rights”); Aldridge, supra, 251 Ga. at 235 (1) (adopting three-part test for associational standing set	1	1
Aldridge v. Georgia Hospitality & Travel Ass'ngreen ga · 1983 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 1 sentence 2007See, e.g., Bo Fancy Productions v. Rabun County Bd. of Commrs., 267 Ga. 341, 344 ( 478 SE2d 373 ) (1996) (applying United States Supreme Court’s relaxed standard of standing where statute attacked on First Amendment grounds); Lambeth v. State, supra, 257 Ga. at 16 , quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U. S. 140, 154-155 (99 SC 2213, 60 LE2d 777) (1979) (“a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse impact on [the party’s] own rights”); Aldridge, supra, 251 Ga. at 235 (1) (adopting three-part test for associational standing set	1	1
Bo Fancy Productions, Inc. v. Rabun County Board of Commissionersgreen ga · 1996 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2007–2007 2 sentences 2007See, e.g., Bo Fancy Productions v. Rabun County Bd. of Commrs., 267 Ga. 341, 344 ( 478 SE2d 373 ) (1996) (applying United States Supreme Court’s relaxed standard of standing where statute attacked on First Amendment grounds); Lambeth v. State, supra, 257 Ga. at 16 , quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U. S. 140, 154-155 (99 SC 2213, 60 LE2d 777) (1979) (“a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse impact on [the party’s] own rights”); Aldridge, supra, 251 Ga. at 235 (1) (adopting three-part test for associational standing set 2007See, e.g., Bo Fancy Productions v. Rabun County Bd. of Commrs., 267 Ga. 341, 344 ( 478 SE2d 373 ) (1996) (applying United States Supreme Court’s relaxed standard of standing where statute attacked on First Amendment grounds); Lambeth v. State, supra, 257 Ga. at 16 , quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U. S. 140, 154-155 (99 SC 2213, 60 LE2d 777) (1979) (“a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only insofar as it has an adverse impact on [the party’s] own rights”); Aldridge, supra, 251 Ga. at 235 (1) (adopting three-part test for associational standing set	1	1
State v. Jacksongreen ga · 1998 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 2 sentences 2005"A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute has an adverse impact on that party's own rights. [Cit.]" State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 310 (1), 496 S.E.2d 912 (1998). 2005"A party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute if the statute has an adverse impact on that party's own rights. [Cit.]" State of Ga. v. Jackson, 269 Ga. 308, 310 (1), 496 S.E.2d 912 (1998).	1	1
Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. Garrettgreen scotus · 2001 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 1 sentence 2003Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989) (a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights). 7 Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U. S. 356, 366-367 (121 SC 955, 148 LE2d 866) (2000); City of Lilburn v. Sanchez, 268 Ga. 520, 522 ( 491 SE2d 353 ) (1997). 8 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 9 Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 481 , 485 (96 SC 1153, 25 LE2d 491) (1970) (citation omitted). 10 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 11 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b), (c). 12 Union City Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, 266 G	1	1
Union City Board of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, Inc.green ga · 1996 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989) (a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights). 7 Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U. S. 356, 366-367 (121 SC 955, 148 LE2d 866) (2000); City of Lilburn v. Sanchez, 268 Ga. 520, 522 ( 491 SE2d 353 ) (1997). 8 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 9 Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 481 , 485 (96 SC 1153, 25 LE2d 491) (1970) (citation omitted). 10 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 11 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b), (c). 12 Union City Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, 266 G 2003Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989) (a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights). 7 Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U. S. 356, 366-367 (121 SC 955, 148 LE2d 866) (2000); City of Lilburn v. Sanchez, 268 Ga. 520, 522 ( 491 SE2d 353 ) (1997). 8 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 9 Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 481 , 485 (96 SC 1153, 25 LE2d 491) (1970) (citation omitted). 10 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 11 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b), (c). 12 Union City Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, 266 G	1	1
City of Lilburn v. Sanchezgreen ga · 1997 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989) (a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights). 7 Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U. S. 356, 366-367 (121 SC 955, 148 LE2d 866) (2000); City of Lilburn v. Sanchez, 268 Ga. 520, 522 ( 491 SE2d 353 ) (1997). 8 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 9 Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 481 , 485 (96 SC 1153, 25 LE2d 491) (1970) (citation omitted). 10 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 11 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b), (c). 12 Union City Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, 266 G 2003Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989) (a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights). 7 Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U. S. 356, 366-367 (121 SC 955, 148 LE2d 866) (2000); City of Lilburn v. Sanchez, 268 Ga. 520, 522 ( 491 SE2d 353 ) (1997). 8 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 9 Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 481 , 485 (96 SC 1153, 25 LE2d 491) (1970) (citation omitted). 10 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 11 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b), (c). 12 Union City Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, 266 G	1	1
Craven v. Lowndes County Hospital Authoritygreen ga · 1993 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003Auth., 263 Ga. 657, 659 ( 437 SE2d 308 ) (1993). 2003Auth., 263 Ga. 657, 659 ( 437 SE2d 308 ) (1993).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
Ambles v. State green ga · 1989 2 sentences 2003Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989) (a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights). 7 Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U. S. 356, 366-367 (121 SC 955, 148 LE2d 866) (2000); City of Lilburn v. Sanchez, 268 Ga. 520, 522 ( 491 SE2d 353 ) (1997). 8 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 9 Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 481 , 485 (96 SC 1153, 25 LE2d 491) (1970) (citation omitted). 10 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 11 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b), (c). 12 Union City Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, 266 G 2003Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406 (1) ( 383 SE2d 555 ) (1989) (a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute adversely impacts that party’s rights). 7 Board of Trustees v. Garrett, 531 U. S. 356, 366-367 (121 SC 955, 148 LE2d 866) (2000); City of Lilburn v. Sanchez, 268 Ga. 520, 522 ( 491 SE2d 353 ) (1997). 8 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 9 Dandridge v. Williams, 397 U. S. 481 , 485 (96 SC 1153, 25 LE2d 491) (1970) (citation omitted). 10 Sanchez, 268 Ga. at 522 . 11 OCGA § 19-6-15 (b), (c). 12 Union City Bd. of Zoning Appeals v. Justice Outdoor Displays, 266 G	3	1998–2003
Barrows v. Jackson green scotus · 1953 1 sentence 2007Itis well established under federal law that although constitutional rights must generally be asserted by the person to whom they belong, Barrows v. Jackson, 346 U. S. 249 (73 SC 1031, 97 LE 1586) (1953), a litigant may assert the rights of a third party in exceptional circumstances.	1	2007–2007
Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. Missouri Ex Rel. Jones green · 1915 2 sentences 2006Jones, 238 U.S. 41, 54 , 35 S.Ct. 671 , 59 L.Ed. 1192 (1915) (to properly challenge the constitutionality of an ordinance or state law, a plaintiff must show he is "within the class with respect to whom the act is unconstitutional, and that the alleged unconstitutional feature injures him . . ." or otherwise deprives him of a protected right). [2] Neither of the cases cited by the Court of Appeals in support of this proposition suggest a statement of future injury is sufficient. 2006Jones, 238 U.S. 41, 54 , 35 S.Ct. 671 , 59 L.Ed. 1192 (1915) (to properly challenge the constitutionality of an ordinance or state law, a plaintiff must show he is "within the class with respect to whom the act is unconstitutional, and that the alleged unconstitutional feature injures him . . ." or otherwise deprives him of a protected right). [2] Neither of the cases cited by the Court of Appeals in support of this proposition suggest a statement of future injury is sufficient.	1	2006–2006
So. Ga. Nat. Gas Co. v. Ga. Pub. Serv. Com. green ga · 1958 2 sentences 2006See, e.g., Lambeth v. State, 257 Ga. 15, 16 , 354 S.E.2d 144 (1987), quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140, 154-55 , 99 S.Ct. 2213 , 60 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979) ("a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute has an adverse impact on the party's own rights"); and South Georgia Natural Gas Co. v. Georgia Public Service Comm'n., 214 Ga. 174 , 104 S.E.2d 97 (1958), quoting Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. State of Missouri ex rel. 2006See, e.g., Lambeth v. State, 257 Ga. 15, 16 , 354 S.E.2d 144 (1987), quoting County Court of Ulster v. Allen, 442 U.S. 140, 154-55 , 99 S.Ct. 2213 , 60 L.Ed.2d 777 (1979) ("a party has standing to challenge the constitutionality of a statute only if the statute has an adverse impact on the party's own rights"); and South Georgia Natural Gas Co. v. Georgia Public Service Comm'n., 214 Ga. 174 , 104 S.E.2d 97 (1958), quoting Mallinckrodt Chemical Works v. State of Missouri ex rel.	1	2006–2006
Broadrick v. Oklahoma green scotus · 1973 1 sentence 1986This is not a First Amendment case where the standing requirements have been relaxed in order to allow “breathing room.” Broadrick, supra at 611-12 .	1	1986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

GA § 5-6-34 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IL 23 (1976–2024) WI 15 (1975–2021) AL 14 (1981–2025) GA 11 (1986–2024) KS 5 (2005–2020) MO 5 (2000–2024) LA 5 (1980–2005) WY 4 (1984–1988) TX 4 (1990–2016) NJ 4 (2014–2019) CA 4 (1990–2025) WA 4 (1984–2025) NY 4 (1989–2013) DC 3 (1971–2007) FL 3 (1987–2010) NC 3 (1999–2025) CT 3 (1988–2002) NM 2 (2022–2022) PA 2 (1979–1987) NE 2 (2019–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check