challenge instruction in Iowa

2015See State v. Schoelerman, 315 N.W.2d 67, 72 (Iowa 1982) (finding nothing would have stopped an attorney from raising an issue if the attorney would have consulted the law in other jurisdictions when none existed in Iowa); see also State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 698 (Iowa 2014) (recognizing failure to preserve error by objecting to an inaccurate jury instruction breaches an attorney’s duty); State v. Ondayog, 722 N.W.2d 778, 785 (Iowa 2006) (“[Fjailure to recognize an erroneous [jury] instruction and preserve error breaches an essential duty.”).

2015See State v. Schoelerman, 315 N.W.2d 67, 72 (Iowa 1982) (finding nothing would have stopped an attorney from raising an issue if the attorney would have consulted the law in other jurisdictions when none existed in Iowa); see also State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 698 (Iowa 2014) (recognizing failure to preserve error by objecting to an inaccurate jury instruction breaches an attorney’s duty); State v. Ondayog, 722 N.W.2d 778, 785 (Iowa 2006) (“[F]ailure to recognize an erroneous [jury] instruction and preserve error breaches an essential duty.”).

2015See State v. Schoelerman, 315 N.W.2d 67, 72 (Iowa 1982) (finding nothing would have stopped an attorney from raising an issue if the attorney would have consulted the law in other jurisdictions when none existed in Iowa); see also State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 698 (Iowa 2014) (recognizing failure to preserve error by objecting to an inaccurate jury instruction breaches an attorney’s duty); State v. Ondayog, 722 N.W.2d 778, 785 (Iowa 2006) (“[Fjailure to recognize an erroneous [jury] instruction and preserve error breaches an essential duty.”).

2015See State v. Schoelerman, 315 N.W.2d 67, 72 (Iowa 1982) (finding nothing would have stopped an attorney from raising an issue if the attorney would have consulted the law in other jurisdictions when none existed in Iowa); see also State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 698 (Iowa 2014) (recognizing failure to preserve error by objecting to an inaccurate jury instruction breaches an attorney’s duty); State v. Ondayog, 722 N.W.2d 778, 785 (Iowa 2006) (“[F]ailure to recognize an erroneous [jury] instruction and preserve error breaches an essential duty.”).

2015See State v. Schoelerman, 315 N.W.2d 67, 72 (Iowa 1982) (finding nothing would have stopped an attorney from raising an issue if the attorney would have consulted the law in other jurisdictions when none existed in Iowa); see also State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 698 (Iowa 2014) (recognizing failure to preserve error by objecting to an inaccurate jury instruction breaches an attorney’s duty); State v. Ondayog, 722 N.W.2d 778, 785 (Iowa 2006) (“[Fjailure to recognize an erroneous [jury] instruction and preserve error breaches an essential duty.”).

2015See State v. Schoelerman, 315 N.W.2d 67, 72 (Iowa 1982) (finding nothing would have stopped an attorney from raising an issue if the attorney would have consulted the law in other jurisdictions when none existed in Iowa); see also State v. Ross, 845 N.W.2d 692, 698 (Iowa 2014) (recognizing failure to preserve error by objecting to an inaccurate jury instruction breaches an attorney’s duty); State v. Ondayog, 722 N.W.2d 778, 785 (Iowa 2006) (“[F]ailure to recognize an erroneous [jury] instruction and preserve error breaches an essential duty.”).

1988Iowa-Illinois Gas & Elec. v. Iowa State Commerce Comm'n, 334 N.W.2d 748, 752 (Iowa 1983).

1988Iowa-Illinois Gas & Elec. v. Iowa State Commerce Comm’n, 334 N.W.2d 748, 752 (Iowa 1983).

2024A challenge under this rule asks “whether the juror holds such a fixed opinion of the merits of the case that he or she cannot judge impartially the guilt or innocence of the defendant.” State v. Linderman, 958 N.W.2d 211 , 218 (Iowa Ct. App. 2021) (quoting State v. Gavin, 360 N.W.2d 817, 819 (Iowa 1985)). 5 Juror 40 reported she had been the victim of an unrelated bank robbery a bit more than two years before this trial.

2021See Johnson, 913 N.W.2d at 258–62 (holding the public-duty doctrine barred a claim against the county by the injured passenger after a driver fell asleep, drove off a county road and into a ditch, and struck a privately owned concrete embankment).

2020See id. at 615–16 (stating failure to preserve error at trial can support an ineffective assistance of counsel claim).

2018State v. Lathrop, 781 N.W.2d 288, 293 (Iowa 2010).

2016See id. at 492.

1997Darla rests this challenge on her claim to have been under the influence of drugs, citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 308-09 , 83 S.Ct. 745, 754-55 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770, 783 (1963) (confession is involuntary when induced by police administering “truth serum”).

1997Darla rests this challenge on her claim to have been under the influence of drugs, citing Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 308-09 , 83 S.Ct. 745, 754-55 , 9 L.Ed.2d 770, 783 (1963) (confession is involuntary when induced by police administering “truth serum”).