11 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.green2 sentences2014App. 3d at 532 (citing United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 584-85 (1960)). 2014App. 3d at 532 (citing United Steelworkers of America v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co., 363 U.S. 574, 584-85 (1960)). | 2 | 4 |
Board of Education of Community School District No. 1 v. Comptongreen2 sentences2016Pursuant to the Act, binding arbitration is a mandatory component in all collective bargaining agreements. 115 ILCS 5/10(c) (West 2010); see Compton, 123 Ill. 2d at 222-23 . 2015Pursuant to the Act, binding arbitration is a mandatory component in all collective bargaining agreements. 115 ILCS 5/10(c) (West 2010); see Compton, 123 Ill. 2d at 222-23 . | 2 | 2 |
Ezekiel v. Jones Motor Co., Inc.green2 sentences1997Compare Ezekiel, 374 Mass, at 387, 372 N.E.2d at 1285 ("protections against false testimony simply do not exist at a labor grievance hearing *** [and the] witness at a grievance hearing need not give sworn testimony”), with 710 ILCS 5/7(a) (West 1994) ("The arbitrator may issue subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses *** and shall have the power to administer oaths”). 1997Compare Ezekiel, 374 Mass. at 386-88 , 372 N.E.2d at 1285 ("protections against false testimony simply do not exist at a labor grievance hearing * * * [the] witness at a grievance hearing need not give sworn testimony"), with 710 ILCS 5/7(a) (West 1994) ("The arbitrator may issues subpoenas for the attendance of witnesses * * * and shall have the power to administer oaths"). | 2 | 2 |
Staunton Community Unit School District No. 6 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Boardgreen1 sentence1996See Staunton Community Unit School District No. 6 v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board, 200 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chicago School Reform Board of Trustes v. Illinois Educational Relations Board
green
2 sentences2014Arbitration Under the CBA ¶ 53 “[A]n agreement to arbitrate disputes will be found where the collective bargaining agreement contains a broad grievance clause without any specific exclusions unless there is forceful evidence of an intent to exclude a particular claim from arbitration.” Chicago School Reform Board, 315 Ill. 2014Additionally, as noted, “an agreement to arbitrate disputes will be found where the collective bargaining agreement contains a broad grievance clause without any specific exclusions unless there is forceful evidence of an intent to exclude a particular claim from arbitration.” Chicago School Reform Board, 315 Ill. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Robert Williams v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc.
green
1 sentence2021Therefore, when plaintiff filed his emergency grievance with the warden and appealed to the ARB, he “did enough under the 2016 version of the [Illinois Administrative] Code to exhaust his remedies.” See id. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Daymon v. Hardin County General Hospital
green
1 sentence1993The provision in the handbook entitled "grievance procedure” permits a faculty member to submit for resolution as a grievance any concern that he "has been treated unfairly, or that policies of the college have been inappropriately implemented in matters pertaining to terms of employment.” This provision, unlike those in cases where a right to contest a discharge has been found, contains no clear promise of a right to appeal matters of "discharge” or "employment status.” (See Daymon v. Hardin County General Hospital (1991), 210 Ill. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.