11 Mississippi opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richardson v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co.green2 sentences2021Co., 923 So. 2d 1002, 1010 (Miss. 2006) (“When we review a claim of trial court error in granting or denying jury instructions, we are required to read and consider all of the jury instructions together as a whole.” (citing Burr v. Miss. 2011“When [an appellate court] reviews a claim of trial court error in granting or denying a jury instruction, [it is] required to review all of the instructions as a whole.” Beverly Enters., Inc. v. Reed, 961 So.2d 40, 43 (¶8) (Miss.2007) (citing Richardson v. Norfolk & S. Ry., 923 So.2d 1002, 1010 (¶ 19) (Miss.2006)). | 6 | 6 |
Burr v. Mississippi Baptist Medical Centergreen2 sentences2007"When we review a claim of trial court error in granting or denying jury instructions, we are required to read and consider all of the jury instructions together as a whole." Burr v. Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, 909 So.2d 721, 726 (Miss.2005) (citations omitted). 2005“When we review a claim of trial court error in granting or denying jury instructions, we are required to read and consider all of the jury instructions together as a whole.” Burr v. Mississippi Baptist Medical Center, 909 So. 2d 721, 726 (Miss. 2005) (citations omitted). | 4 | 4 |
Burton by Bradford v. Barnettgreen1 sentence2011“Defects in specific instructions will not mandate reversal when all of the instructions, taken as a whole[,] fairly—although not perfectly—announce the applicable primary rules of law.” Id. (citing Burton v. Barnett, 615 So.2d 580, 583 (Miss.1993)). ¶ 23. | 1 | 1 |
Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Reedgreen1 sentence2011“When [an appellate court] reviews a claim of trial court error in granting or denying a jury instruction, [it is] required to review all of the instructions as a whole.” Beverly Enters., Inc. v. Reed, 961 So.2d 40, 43 (¶8) (Miss.2007) (citing Richardson v. Norfolk & S. Ry., 923 So.2d 1002, 1010 (¶ 19) (Miss.2006)). | 1 | 1 |
Chisolm v. Stategreen1 sentence2000Prerequisite to a claim of trial court error for failing to grant a challenge for cause Farmer must show "that he had exhausted all of his peremptory challenges and that the incompetent juror was forced upon him by the trial court's erroneous ruling." Chisolm v. State, 529 So.2d 635, 639 (Miss.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See also Martin v. State, 592 So.2d 987, 988 (Miss.1991); Hansen v. State, 592 So.2d 114, 129 (Miss.1991). | 1 | 1 |
Hansen v. Stategreen1 sentence2000See also Martin v. State, 592 So.2d 987, 988 (Miss.1991); Hansen v. State, 592 So.2d 114, 129 (Miss.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.