11 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2023 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2023Put differently, a Batson analysis consists of a three-step process: “First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the [S]tate exercised a race- based peremptory challenge.” State v. Taylor, 362 N.C. 514, 527 (2008). 2023Thus, a Batson analysis consists of three steps: “First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the [S]tate exercised a race-based peremptory challenge.” State v. Taylor, 362 N.C. 514, 527 (2008). | 7 | 9 |
Johnson v. Californiagreen2 sentences2022CLEGG 2022-NCSC-11 Opinion of the Court Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476 ; see Taylor, 362 N.C. at 527 (“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a race-based peremptory challenge”). “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson, 545 U.S. at 170 ; see State v. Hobbs, 374 N.C. 345 , 350 (2020) (quoting Johnson for this proposition). 2022CLEGG 2022-NCSC-11 Opinion of the Court Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476 ; see Taylor, 362 N.C. at 527 (“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a race-based peremptory challenge”). “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson, 545 U.S. at 170 ; see State v. Hobbs, 374 N.C. 345 , 350 (2020) (quoting Johnson for this proposition). | 3 | 3 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Snyder v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2022CLEGG 2022-NCSC-11 Opinion of the Court Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476 ; see Taylor, 362 N.C. at 527 (“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a race-based peremptory challenge”). “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson, 545 U.S. at 170 ; see State v. Hobbs, 374 N.C. 345 , 350 (2020) (quoting Johnson for this proposition). 2022CLEGG 2022-NCSC-11 Opinion of the Court Snyder, 552 U.S. at 476 ; see Taylor, 362 N.C. at 527 (“First, the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a race-based peremptory challenge”). “[A] defendant satisfies the requirements of Batson’s first step by producing evidence sufficient to permit the trial judge to draw an inference that discrimination has occurred.” Johnson, 545 U.S. at 170 ; see State v. Hobbs, 374 N.C. 345 , 350 (2020) (quoting Johnson for this proposition). | 3 | 2022–2022 |
Batson v. Kentucky
green
2 sentences2010Ed. 2d at 83 , 106 S. Ct. at 1719 , the United States Supreme Court explained that “the Equal Protection Clause forbids the prosecutor to challenge potential jurors solely on account of their race or oh the assumption that black jurors as a group will be unable impartially to consider the State’s case against a black defendant.” Our Supreme Court has construed Batson as outlining a “three-part test for determining whether the state impermissibly excluded a juror on the basis of race”: (1) “the defendant must make a prima facie showing that the state exercised a race-based peremptory challenge” 2008Augustine, 359 N.C. at 715 , 616 S.E.2d at 522 (citing Batson, 476 U.S. at 96-97 ). | 3 | 2005–2010 |
State v. James
green
2 sentences2016James , 230 N.C.App. at 349 , 750 S.E.2d at 854 . 2016James , 230 N.C.App. at 349 , 750 S.E.2d at 854 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Augustine
green
2 sentences2008Augustine, 359 N.C. at 715 , 616 S.E.2d at 522 (citing Batson, 476 U.S. at 96-97 ). 2008Augustine, 359 N.C. at 715 , 616 S.E.2d at 522 (citing Batson, 476 U.S. at 96-97 ). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.