11 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2002–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Parker v. Barefootgreen2 sentences2011When a request is made for a specific jury instruction that is correct as a matter of law and is supported by the evidence, the trial court is required to give an instruction expressing “at least the substance of the requested instruction[.]” Parker v. Barefoot, 130 N.C. 2002When a request is made for a specific jury instruction that is correct as a matter of law and is supported by the evidence, the trial court is required to give an instruction expressing “at least the substance of the requested instruction.” Parker v. Barefoot, 130 N.C. | 2 | 4 |
Walker v. TOWN OF STONEVILLEgreen1 sentence2025“When a request is made for a specific jury instruction that is correct as a matter of law and is supported by the evidence, the trial court is required to give an instruction expressing at least the substance of the requested instruction.” Walker v. Town of Stoneville, 211 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Augustinegreen1 sentence2024See id. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Carsongreen2 sentences2014As long as the jury hears the substance of the requested instruction, “the trial court is not required to use the same language as requested by counsel, even when the language used could have included more details.” State v. Carson, 80 N.C. 2014App. 620, 626 , 343 S.E.2d 275, 279 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bordersgreen1 sentence2011App. 120, 123 , 594 S.E.2d 813, 815-16 (2004) (holding no error where the instruction given to the jury was “virtually identical” to the pattern instruction and thus gave the substance of the requested instruction). | 1 | 1 |
Liborio v. Kinggreen2 sentences2009When a request is made for a specific jury instruction that is correct as a matter of law and is supported by the evidence, the trial *717 court is required to give an instruction expressing “at least the substance of the requested instruction.” On appeal, this Court “must consider and review the challenged instructions in their entirety; it cannot dissect and examine them in fragments,” in order to determine if the court’s instruction provided “the substance of the instruction requested[.]” Liborio v. King, 150 N.C. 2009App. 531, 534 , 564 S.E.2d 272, 274-75 (2002) (citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lucasgreen2 sentences2004State v. Lucas, 353 N.C. 568, 578 , 548 S.E.2d 712, 719-20 (2001) (internal citations omitted). 2004State v. Lucas, 353 N.C. 568, 578 , 548 S.E.2d 712, 719-20 (2001) (internal citations omitted). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parker v. Barefoot
neutral
2 sentences2011App. 18, 20 , 502 S.E.2d 42,44 (1998), rev’d on other grounds, 351 N.C. 40 , 519 S.E.2d 315 (1999). 2011App. 18, 20 , 502 S.E.2d 42,44 (1998), rev’d on other grounds, 351 N.C. 40 , 519 S.E.2d 315 (1999). | 2 | 2002–2011 |
McLain v. Taco Bell Corp.
green
2 sentences2005McLain, 137 N.C. 2005McLain, 137 N.C.App. at 182 , 527 S.E.2d at 715 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.