right to assert prejudicial error in Nebraska

79 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2026 18 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (6)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Wattgreen neb · 2013 · cited in 4 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2013–2016 2 sentences 2016State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013). 2016State v. Watt, 285 Neb. 647 , 832 N.W.2d 459 (2013).	1	4
State v. Schreinergreen neb · 2008 · cited in 3 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2009–2025 2 sentences 2009And "[t]he failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal." State v. Schreiner, 276 Neb. 393, 418 , 754 N.W.2d 742, 762 (2008). 2009And "[t]he failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal." State v. Schreiner, 276 Neb. 393, 418 , 754 N.W.2d 742, 762 (2008).	1	3
State v. Datgreen neb · 2025 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 1 sentence 2025DAT Cite as 318 Neb. 311 3.	1	1
Hass v. Nethgreen neb · 2003 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009	1	1
State v. Perrigogreen neb · 1994 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009	1	1
In Re Interest of Kassara M.green neb · 1999 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (45)

Case	Cited	Years
In re Estate of Clinger green neb · 2015 2 sentences 2019As we previously stated, “a litigant’s failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal.” In re Estate of Clinger, 292 Neb. 237, 262 , 872 N.W.2d 37 , 55-56 (2015). 2018In re Estate of Clinger, 292 Neb. 237 , 872 N.W.2d 37 (2015).	7	2016–2019
Nichols v. Busse green neb · 1993 2 sentences 2005Id. 1997Reavis v. Slominski, 250 Neb. 711 , 551 N.W.2d 528 (1996); Schiffern v. Niobrara Valley Electric, 250 Neb. 1 , 547 N.W.2d 478 (1996); Barks v. Cosgriff Co., 247 Neb. 660 , 529 N.W.2d 749 (1995); Nichols v. Busse, 243 Neb. 811 , 503 N.W.2d 173 (1993).	7	1995–2005
Ecker v. E&A Consulting Grp., Inc. green neb · 2019 2 sentences 2021Our case law is clear that the failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 4 An appel- late court will not consider an argument or theory that is raised for the first time on appeal. 5 Thus, when an issue is raised 2 Yeransian v. Willkie Farr, 305 Neb. 693 , 942 N.W.2d 226 (2020); Eddy v. Builders Supply Co., 304 Neb. 804 , 937 N.W.2d 198 (2020). 3 Id. 4 Ecker v. E & A Consulting Group, 302 Neb. 578 , 924 N.W.2d 671 (2019); State v. Collins, 281 Neb. 927 , 799 N.W.2d 693 (2011). 5 State v. Kruse, 303 Neb. 799 , 931 N.W.2d 148 (2019); First Express 2021Our case law is clear that the failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 4 An appel- late court will not consider an argument or theory that is raised for the first time on appeal. 5 Thus, when an issue is raised 2 Yeransian v. Willkie Farr, 305 Neb. 693 , 942 N.W.2d 226 (2020); Eddy v. Builders Supply Co., 304 Neb. 804 , 937 N.W.2d 198 (2020). 3 Id. 4 Ecker v. E & A Consulting Group, 302 Neb. 578 , 924 N.W.2d 671 (2019); State v. Collins, 281 Neb. 927 , 799 N.W.2d 693 (2011). 5 State v. Kruse, 303 Neb. 799 , 931 N.W.2d 148 (2019); First Express	6	2019–2023
State v. Casterline green neb · 2016 2 sentences 2018State v. Casterline, 293 Neb. 41 , 878 N.W.2d 38 (2016) (failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal). 2018State v. Casterline, 293 Neb. 41 , 878 N.W.2d 38 (2016) (failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal).	6	2016–2019
State v. Johnson green neb · 2023 2 sentences 2026State v. Johnson, 314 Neb. 20 , 988 N.W.2d 159 (2023). 2026State v. Johnson, 314 Neb. 20 , 988 N.W.2d 159 (2023).	5	2023–2026
State v. Rush green neb · 2024 2 sentences 2025App. Feb. 16, 2021) (selected for posting to court website). 24 See State v. Waltrip, 240 Neb. 888 , 484 N.W.2d 831 (1992). 25 State v. Brown, 317 Neb. 273 , 9 N.W.3d 871 (2024). 26 See State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622, 662 , 11 N.W.3d 394 , 428 (2024), modified on denial of rehearing 317 Neb. 917 , 12 N.W.3d 787 (“[f]ailure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal”). - 323 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 318 Nebraska Reports STATE V. 2025State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622 , 11 N.W.3d 394, modified on denial of rehearing 317 Neb. 917 , 12 N.W.3d 787.	4	2024–2025
State v. Devers green neb · 2020 2 sentences 2024However, the failure to object to evidence at trial, even if the evidence was the subject of a previous motion to suppress, waives the objection, and a party will not be heard to complain of the alleged error on appeal. 41 Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 42 Thus, we will address only whether trial counsel was ineffective and whether the court committed plain error in relation to this evidence. (a) General Principles of Ineffective Assistance [26] Generally, to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. 2024However, the failure to object to evidence at trial, even if the evidence was the subject of a previous motion to suppress, waives the objection, and a party will not be heard to complain of the alleged error on appeal. 41 Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 42 Thus, we will address only whether trial counsel was ineffective and whether the court committed plain error in relation to this evidence. (a) General Principles of Ineffective Assistance [26] Generally, to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v.	4	2020–2024
State v. Schwaderer green neb · 2017 2 sentences 2024State v. Schwaderer, 296 Neb. 932 , 898 N.W.2d 318 (2017). 2024State v. Schwaderer, 296 Neb. 932 , 898 N.W.2d 318 (2017).	4	2018–2024
Reavis v. Solminski green neb · 1996 2 sentences 1999Benzel v. Keller Indus., 253 Neb. 20 , 567 N.W.2d 552 (1997); Reavis v. Slominski, 250 Neb. 711 , 551 N.W.2d 528 (1996). 1999Benzel v. Keller Indus., 253 Neb. 20 , 567 N.W.2d 552 (1997); Reavis v. Slominski, 250 Neb. 711 , 551 N.W.2d 528 (1996).	4	1997–1999
State v. Childs green neb · 2021 2 sentences 2026State v. Childs, 309 Neb. 427 , 960 N.W.2d 585 (2021). 2021Because the failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal, 13 Jean generally asks that we review both assignments under our plain error jurisprudence. [9] We have long held that an appellate court may find plain error on appeal when an error unasserted or uncomplained of at trial, but plainly evident from the record, prejudicially 12 See Stanko, supra note 2 . 13 Western Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 305 Neb. 1 , 938 N.W.2d 329 (2020). - 440 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. CHILDS Cite as 309 Neb. 427 a	3	2021–2026
State v. Rush -- supplemental opinion green neb · 2024 2 sentences 2025App. Feb. 16, 2021) (selected for posting to court website). 24 See State v. Waltrip, 240 Neb. 888 , 484 N.W.2d 831 (1992). 25 State v. Brown, 317 Neb. 273 , 9 N.W.3d 871 (2024). 26 See State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622, 662 , 11 N.W.3d 394 , 428 (2024), modified on denial of rehearing 317 Neb. 917 , 12 N.W.3d 787 (“[f]ailure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal”). - 323 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 318 Nebraska Reports STATE V. 2025State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622 , 11 N.W.3d 394, modified on denial of rehearing 317 Neb. 917 , 12 N.W.3d 787.	3	2025–2025
State v. Swindle green neb · 2018 2 sentences 2021State v. Swindle, 300 Neb. 734 , 915 N.W.2d 795 (2018). 2021State v. Swindle, 300 Neb. 734 , 915 N.W.2d 795 (2018).	3	2018–2021
State v. Huerta green nebctapp · 2018 2 sentences 2018Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. - 171 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports STATE v. HUERTA Cite as 26 Neb. 2018Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. - 171 - Nebraska Court of A ppeals A dvance Sheets 26 Nebraska A ppellate R eports STATE v. HUERTA Cite as 26 Neb.	3	2018–2019
Benzel v. Keller Industries, Inc. green neb · 1997 2 sentences 2000Mischke v. Mischke, 253 Neb. 439 , 571 N.W.2d 248 (1997); Benzel v. Keller Indus., 253 Neb. 20 , 567 N.W.2d 552 (1997). 2000Mischke v. Mischke, 253 Neb. 439 , 571 N.W.2d 248 (1997); Benzel v. Keller Indus., 253 Neb. 20 , 567 N.W.2d 552 (1997).	3	1999–2000
Barks v. Cosgriff Co. green neb · 1995 2 sentences 1997Reavis v. Slominski, 250 Neb. 711 , 551 N.W.2d 528 (1996); Schiffern v. Niobrara Valley Electric, 250 Neb. 1 , 547 N.W.2d 478 (1996); Barks v. Cosgriff Co., 247 Neb. 660 , 529 N.W.2d 749 (1995); Nichols v. Busse, 243 Neb. 811 , 503 N.W.2d 173 (1993). 1997Reavis v. Slominski, 250 Neb. 711 , 551 N.W.2d 528 (1996); Schiffern v. Niobrara Valley Electric, 250 Neb. 1 , 547 N.W.2d 478 (1996); Barks v. Cosgriff Co., 247 Neb. 660 , 529 N.W.2d 749 (1995); Nichols v. Busse, 243 Neb. 811 , 503 N.W.2d 173 (1993).	3	1996–1997
Western Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy green neb · 2020 2 sentences 2021Because the failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal, 13 Jean generally asks that we review both assignments under our plain error jurisprudence. [9] We have long held that an appellate court may find plain error on appeal when an error unasserted or uncomplained of at trial, but plainly evident from the record, prejudicially 12 See Stanko, supra note 2 . 13 Western Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 305 Neb. 1 , 938 N.W.2d 329 (2020). - 440 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. CHILDS Cite as 309 Neb. 427 a 2021Because the failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal, 13 Jean generally asks that we review both assignments under our plain error jurisprudence. [9] We have long held that an appellate court may find plain error on appeal when an error unasserted or uncomplained of at trial, but plainly evident from the record, prejudicially 12 See Stanko, supra note 2 . 13 Western Ethanol Co. v. Midwest Renewable Energy, 305 Neb. 1 , 938 N.W.2d 329 (2020). - 440 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. CHILDS Cite as 309 Neb. 427 a	2	2020–2021
Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co. green neb · 2017 2 sentences 2019We agree. [3-6] We have often said that failure to make a timely objec- tion waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal.3 When an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower court cannot com- mit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted 2 Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682 , 900 N.W.2d 909 (2017). 3 State v. Collins, 281 Neb. 927 , 799 N.W.2d 693 (2011). - 584 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports ECKER v. E & A CONSULTING GROUP Cite as 302 Neb. 578 to it 2019We agree. [3-6] We have often said that failure to make a timely objec- tion waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal.3 When an issue is raised for the first time in an appellate court, it will be disregarded inasmuch as a lower court cannot com- mit error in resolving an issue never presented and submitted 2 Salem Grain Co. v. Consolidated Grain & Barge Co., 297 Neb. 682 , 900 N.W.2d 909 (2017). 3 State v. Collins, 281 Neb. 927 , 799 N.W.2d 693 (2011). - 584 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 302 Nebraska R eports ECKER v. E & A CONSULTING GROUP Cite as 302 Neb. 578 to it	2	2019–2019
Geiss v. Geiss green nebctapp · 2013 2 sentences 2018Geiss v. Geiss, 20 Neb. 2018Geiss v. Geiss, 20 Neb.	2	2018–2018
State v. Samuel B. green neb · 2002 2 sentences 2005In re Interest of Phyllisa B., 265 Neb. 53 , 654 N.W.2d 738 (2002). 2005In re Interest of Phyllisa B., 265 Neb. 53 , 654 N.W.2d 738 (2002).	2	2003–2005
Parker v. Parker green neb · 2004 2 sentences 2005Parker v. Parker, 268 Neb. 187 , 681 N.W.2d 735 (2004). 2005Parker v. Parker, 268 Neb. 187 , 681 N.W.2d 735 (2004).	2	2005–2005
Davis v. Wimes green neb · 2002 2 sentences 2003Davis v. Wimes, 263 Neb. 504 , 641 N.W.2d 37 (2002). 2003Davis v. Wimes, 263 Neb. 504 , 641 N.W.2d 37 (2002).	2	2003–2003
Schiffern v. Niobrara Valley Electric Membership Corp. green neb · 1996 2 sentences 1997Reavis v. Slominski, 250 Neb. 711 , 551 N.W.2d 528 (1996); Schiffern v. Niobrara Valley Electric, 250 Neb. 1 , 547 N.W.2d 478 (1996); Barks v. Cosgriff Co., 247 Neb. 660 , 529 N.W.2d 749 (1995); Nichols v. Busse, 243 Neb. 811 , 503 N.W.2d 173 (1993). 1997Reavis v. Slominski, 250 Neb. 711 , 551 N.W.2d 528 (1996); Schiffern v. Niobrara Valley Electric, 250 Neb. 1 , 547 N.W.2d 478 (1996); Barks v. Cosgriff Co., 247 Neb. 660 , 529 N.W.2d 749 (1995); Nichols v. Busse, 243 Neb. 811 , 503 N.W.2d 173 (1993).	2	1997–1997
State v. Brown green neb · 2024 1 sentence 2025App. Feb. 16, 2021) (selected for posting to court website). 24 See State v. Waltrip, 240 Neb. 888 , 484 N.W.2d 831 (1992). 25 State v. Brown, 317 Neb. 273 , 9 N.W.3d 871 (2024). 26 See State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622, 662 , 11 N.W.3d 394 , 428 (2024), modified on denial of rehearing 317 Neb. 917 , 12 N.W.3d 787 (“[f]ailure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal”). - 323 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 318 Nebraska Reports STATE V.	1	2025–2025
State v. Waltrip neutral neb · 1992 2 sentences 2025App. Feb. 16, 2021) (selected for posting to court website). 24 See State v. Waltrip, 240 Neb. 888 , 484 N.W.2d 831 (1992). 25 State v. Brown, 317 Neb. 273 , 9 N.W.3d 871 (2024). 26 See State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622, 662 , 11 N.W.3d 394 , 428 (2024), modified on denial of rehearing 317 Neb. 917 , 12 N.W.3d 787 (“[f]ailure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal”). - 323 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 318 Nebraska Reports STATE V. 2025App. Feb. 16, 2021) (selected for posting to court website). 24 See State v. Waltrip, 240 Neb. 888 , 484 N.W.2d 831 (1992). 25 State v. Brown, 317 Neb. 273 , 9 N.W.3d 871 (2024). 26 See State v. Rush, 317 Neb. 622, 662 , 11 N.W.3d 394 , 428 (2024), modified on denial of rehearing 317 Neb. 917 , 12 N.W.3d 787 (“[f]ailure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal”). - 323 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 318 Nebraska Reports STATE V.	1	2025–2025
Strickland v. Washington green scotus · 1984 2 sentences 2024However, the failure to object to evidence at trial, even if the evidence was the subject of a previous motion to suppress, waives the objection, and a party will not be heard to complain of the alleged error on appeal. 41 Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 42 Thus, we will address only whether trial counsel was ineffective and whether the court committed plain error in relation to this evidence. (a) General Principles of Ineffective Assistance [26] Generally, to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. 2024However, the failure to object to evidence at trial, even if the evidence was the subject of a previous motion to suppress, waives the objection, and a party will not be heard to complain of the alleged error on appeal. 41 Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 42 Thus, we will address only whether trial counsel was ineffective and whether the court committed plain error in relation to this evidence. (a) General Principles of Ineffective Assistance [26] Generally, to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v.	1	2024–2024
State v. Lowman green neb · 2021 2 sentences 2024However, the failure to object to evidence at trial, even if the evidence was the subject of a previous motion to suppress, waives the objection, and a party will not be heard to complain of the alleged error on appeal. 41 Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 42 Thus, we will address only whether trial counsel was ineffective and whether the court committed plain error in relation to this evidence. (a) General Principles of Ineffective Assistance [26] Generally, to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v. 2024However, the failure to object to evidence at trial, even if the evidence was the subject of a previous motion to suppress, waives the objection, and a party will not be heard to complain of the alleged error on appeal. 41 Failure to make a timely objection waives the right to assert prejudicial error on appeal. 42 Thus, we will address only whether trial counsel was ineffective and whether the court committed plain error in relation to this evidence. (a) General Principles of Ineffective Assistance [26] Generally, to prevail on a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel under Strickland v.	1	2024–2024
State v. Henderson green neb · 2018	1	2024–2024
State v. Clark green neb · 2024 1 sentence 2024Ed. 2d 674 (1984). 44 State v. Clark, 315 Neb. 736 , 1 N.W.3d 487 (2024). 45 See State v. Henderson, 301 Neb. 633 , 920 N.W.2d 246 (2018). 46 Id. - 663 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 317 Nebraska Reports STATE V.	1	2024–2024
Yeransian v. Willkie Farr green neb · 2020	1	2021–2021
Eddy v. Builders Supply Co. green neb · 2020	1	2021–2021
Eletech, Inc. v. Conveyance Consulting Group green neb · 2021	1	2021–2021
State v. Kruse green neb · 2019	1	2021–2021
Berger v. Dempsey-Cook (In Re Guardianship of Aimee S.) green nebctapp · 2018	1	2018–2018
Jacobson v. Shresta green neb · 2014	1	2018–2018
State v. Oliveria-Coutinho green neb · 2015	1	2016–2016
Garrett v. Garrett green nebctapp · 1995	1	2013–2013
Shipler v. General Motors Corp. green nebctapp · 2006	1	2009–2009
Genthon v. Kratville red neb · 2005	1	2006–2006
Steele v. Sedlacek green neb · 2003	1	2004–2004
Hawkins v. City of Omaha green neb · 2001	1	2002–2002

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-105 (13) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-403 (10) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-319 (10) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-404 (9) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-801 (7) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-803 (6) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-901 (5) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 27-701 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 28-1205 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-1816 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 29-2221 (4) NE § Neb. Rev. Stat. § 43-247 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check