Trustees claim (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

Trustees claim in Ohio

11 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1904–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Tiger Investments of Columbus, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Commissiongreen
ohioctapp · 1982 · cited in 2 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2000–2006
2 sentences

2006Because the Division rejected Sowders’ renewal application for an independent reason aside from the Trustees’ objection, the trial court’s exclusion of the Trustees’ objection would not have precluded the Division from rejecting Sowders’ application for “good cause.” Tiger Invest. of Columbus Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1982), 8 Ohio App.3d 316, 318 [, 8 OBR 424], 457 N.E.2d 320, 323 ; Leo G.

2006Because the Division rejected Sowders’ renewal application for an independent reason aside from the Trustees’ objection, the trial court’s exclusion of the Trustees’ objection would not have precluded the Division from rejecting Sowders’ application for “good cause.” Tiger Invest. of Columbus Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1982), 8 Ohio App.3d 316, 318 [, 8 OBR 424], 457 N.E.2d 320, 323 ; Leo G.

12
Montgomery v. Kennedygreen
tex · 1984 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Montgomery v. Kennedy, 669 S.W.2d 309, 313 (Tex. 1984).” Huie v. DeShazo, 922 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. 1996) (original proceeding). {¶113} Several documents were withheld by the Trustees under a claim of attorney-client privilege.

2017Montgomery v. Kennedy , 669 S.W.2d 309 , 313 (Tex. 1984)." Huie v. DeShazo , 922 S.W.2d 920 , 923 (Tex. 1996) (original proceeding). {¶ 113} Several documents were withheld by the Trustees under a claim of attorney-client privilege.

11
Huie v. DeShazogreen
tex · 1996 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
2 sentences

2017Montgomery v. Kennedy, 669 S.W.2d 309, 313 (Tex. 1984).” Huie v. DeShazo, 922 S.W.2d 920, 923 (Tex. 1996) (original proceeding). {¶113} Several documents were withheld by the Trustees under a claim of attorney-client privilege.

2017Montgomery v. Kennedy , 669 S.W.2d 309 , 313 (Tex. 1984)." Huie v. DeShazo , 922 S.W.2d 920 , 923 (Tex. 1996) (original proceeding). {¶ 113} Several documents were withheld by the Trustees under a claim of attorney-client privilege.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Leo G. Keffalas, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Commission neutral
ohioctapp · 1991
2 sentences

2006Keffalas, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1991), 74 Ohio App.3d 650, 652 , 600 N.E.2d 275, 276 .

2006Keffalas, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm. (1991), 74 Ohio App.3d 650, 652 , 600 N.E.2d 275, 276 .

22000–2006
Schomaeker v. First National Bank of Ottawa green
ohio · 1981
2 sentences

1996Bank (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 304 , 20 O.O.3d 285 , 421 N.E.2d 530 , paragraph two of the syllabus.

1996Bank (1981), 66 Ohio St.2d 304 , 20 O.O.3d 285 , 421 N.E.2d 530 , paragraph two of the syllabus.

21996–1996
State ex rel. Armatas v. Plain Twp. Bd. of Trustees green
ohioctapp · 2017
1 sentence

2018Stark No. 2016CA00188, 2017-Ohio-2645 , 2017 WL 1736672 , we granted the Trustees' motion to dismiss.

12018–2018
Raulston v. Everett green
texapp · 1978
2 sentences

2017The Trustees also cite Raulston v. Everett, 561 S.W.2d 635 (Tex.Civ.App.1978), which concluded that a membership corporation is similar to an unincorporated association, though it is incorporated.

2017The Trustees also cite Raulston v. Everett, 561 S.W.2d 635 (Tex.Civ.App.1978), which concluded that a membership corporation is similar to an unincorporated association, though it is incorporated.

12017–2017
State ex rel. Chrisman v. Clearcreek Twp. neutral
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2014Warren No. CA2012-08-076, 2013-Ohio-2396 . -2- Warren CA2013-03-025 approximately 20 percent of the Trustees' defense had been specific to the non-public meetings, and therefore ordered 20 percent of the attorney fees be paid, totaling $2,014.83. {¶ 5} Relator objected to the magistrate's decision, and the trial court overruled the objection, adopting the magistrate's award of attorney fees.

12014–2014
Temple v. Wean United, Inc. green
ohio · 1977
1 sentence

2003We agree. {¶ 7} Pursuant to Civ.R. 56(C), summary judgment is proper if: "(1) No genuine issue as to any material fact remains to be litigated; (2) the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law; and (3) it appears from the evidence that reasonable minds can come to but one conclusion, and viewing such evidence most strongly in favor of the party against whom the motion for summary judgment is made, that conclusion is adverse to that party." Temple v. Wean United, Inc. (1977), 50 Ohio St.2d 317 , 327 . {¶ 8} Appellate review of a trial court's entry of summary judgment is de novo,

12003–2003
Kisil v. City of Sandusky green
ohio · 1984
2 sentences

2003Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30 , 34 , 465 N.E.2d 848 ; see R.C. 2506.04 .

2003Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30 , 34 , 465 N.E.2d 848 ; see R.C. 2506.04 .

12003–2003
Tenney v. Brandhove green
scotus · 1951
2 sentences

1995Tenney v. Brandhove (1951), 341 U.S. 367 , 71 S.Ct. 783 , 95 L.Ed. 1019 ; Enghauser, supra. Acts of township trustees, while even done through the vehicle of “resolutions,” can be, when directed at a single person or property, administrative.

1995Tenney v. Brandhove (1951), 341 U.S. 367 , 71 S.Ct. 783 , 95 L.Ed. 1019 ; Enghauser, supra. Acts of township trustees, while even done through the vehicle of “resolutions,” can be, when directed at a single person or property, administrative.

11995–1995
The People v. . the City Bank of Rochester green
· 1884
1 sentence

1904(People v. City Bank of Rochester, 96 N. Y. 32, 37 .) The notes thus given were charged against specific portions of the general fund, which the trustees could claim notwithstanding the fact that all the moneys were mingled together.

11904–1904

Where else courts name it

CA 14 (1930–2025) OH 11 (1904–2018) NY 10 (1886–2025) FL 9 (1981–2024) PA 8 (1956–2024) TX 7 (1961–2021) MA 6 (1942–2010) MO 6 (1968–2023) ME 3 (1995–2017) MD 3 (1991–2011) IL 3 (1963–1996) IN 3 (1995–2004) ID 3 (1977–2021) HI 2 (2007–2007) LA 2 (1971–1985) WA 2 (1976–2013) WV 2 (1900–1999)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check