11 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2015–2023 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dept. of Human Services v. K. G. T.green2 sentences2023M. reasonable because the agency has declined to provide a particular service, the court’s ‘reasonable efforts’ determi- nation should include something resembling a cost-benefit analysis, at least when * * * the agency itself has deemed that service to be ‘key’ to the reunification plan.” Id. at 377 (internal quotation marks omitted). 2023T., DHS’s “fail[ure] to explore any options beyond whatever happened to be available through DOC” made it “impossible to know what other options might exist or what they would cost” and therefore “impossible to know whether DHS’s efforts were reasonable or not” under the applicable cost-benefit analysis. 306 Or App at 384 . | 3 | 3 |
Department of Human Services v. C. L. H.green2 sentences2020H., 283 Or App 313, 323 , 388 P3d 1214 (2017) (noting that “the juvenile court must engage in something resembling a cost-benefit analysis” to determine whether failing to offer a specific type of service was reason- able (internal quotation marks omitted)). 2020H., 283 Or App 313, 323 , 388 P3d 1214 (2017) (noting that “the juvenile court must engage in something resembling a cost-benefit analysis” to determine whether failing to offer a specific type of service was reason- able (internal quotation marks omitted)). | 2 | 2 |
Department of Human Services v. M. K.green2 sentences2020“Put bluntly, when a parent contends that DHS’s efforts have not been reasonable because the agency has declined to provide a particular service, the court’s ‘reasonable efforts’ determi- nation should include something resembling a cost-benefit analysis, at least when * * * the agency itself has deemed that service to be ‘key’ to the reunification plan.” Id. at 418 . 2017Put bluntly, when a parent contends that DHS’s efforts have not been reasonable because the agency has declined to provide a particular service, the court’s ‘reasonable efforts’ determination should include something resembling a cost-benefit analysis, at least when—as here—the agency itself has deemed that service to be ‘key’ to the reunification plan.” Id. at 418 (emphasis in original). | 1 | 2 |
State ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2019Dept. v. Williams, 204 Or App 496, 507 , 130 P3d 801 (2006) (“[T]he reasonableness of DHS’s efforts is dependent on the unique circumstances of a particular case[.]”). 2019Dept. v. Williams, 204 Or App 496, 507 , 130 P3d 801 (2006) (“[T]he reasonableness of DHS’s efforts is dependent on the unique circumstances of a particular case[.]”). | 1 | 1 |
Green v. Frankegreen2 sentences2018Green v. Franke , 357 Or. 301 , 319-20, 350 P.3d 188 (2015) ("[E]ven where a cost-benefit inquiry suggests that counsel's failure to seek a limiting instruction was deficient, the question remains whether the omission constituted inadequate assistance of counsel, particularly when viewed in light of the strategy that counsel did pursue."). 2018Green v. Franke , 357 Or. 301 , 319-20, 350 P.3d 188 (2015) ("[E]ven where a cost-benefit inquiry suggests that counsel's failure to seek a limiting instruction was deficient, the question remains whether the omission constituted inadequate assistance of counsel, particularly when viewed in light of the strategy that counsel did pursue."). | 1 | 1 |
Pereida-Alba v. Courseygreen2 sentences2015See id. at 674 . 2015Pereida-Alba, 356 Or at 674 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ramos v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences2021Eschewing that approach, the Court criticized Apodaca’s “breezy cost-benefit analysis,” Id. at ___, 140 S Ct at 1401 , and ultimately emphasized that its “real objection here isn’t that the Apodaca plurality’s cost- benefit analysis was too skimpy. 2021Eschewing that approach, the Court criticized Apodaca’s “breezy cost-benefit analysis,” Id. at ___, 140 S Ct at 1401 , and ultimately emphasized that its “real objection here isn’t that the Apodaca plurality’s cost- benefit analysis was too skimpy. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Farmer v. Premo
green
1 sentence2020For another thing, the mere fact that petitioner’s trial attorney may have had a reasonable basis for her deci- sion does not satisfy the requirement, under cases such as Farmer, that tactical decisions follow a cost-benefit analysis. 98 Delgado-Juarez v. Cain 363 Or at 699 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Trujillo v. Maass
green
2 sentences2018In this case, the failure to object reflected a failure "to exercise reasonable professional skill and judgment." Trujillo v. Maass , 312 Or. 431 , 435, 822 P.2d 703 (1991). 2018In this case, the failure to object reflected a failure "to exercise reasonable professional skill and judgment." Trujillo v. Maass , 312 Or. 431 , 435, 822 P.2d 703 (1991). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.