10 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1993–2009 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Doss v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See Doss, 351 Ark. 667 , 97 S.W.3d 413 ; Cathey, 351 Ark. 464 , 95 S.W.3d 753 . 2005See Doss, 351 Ark. 667 , 97 S.W.3d 413 ; Cathey, 351 Ark. 464 , 95 S.W.3d 753 . | 2 | 2 |
Prendergast v. Craftgreen1 sentence2009See also Prendergast v. Craft, 102 Ark. | 1 | 1 |
Hayes v. Stategreen2 sentences1994See Hayes v. State, 312 Ark. 349 , 849 S.W.2d 501 (1993); Collins v. State, 308 Ark. 536 , 826 S.W.2d 231 (1992); DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 , 815 S.W.2d 942 (1991). 1994See Hayes v. State, 312 Ark. 349 , 849 S.W.2d 501 (1993); Collins v. State, 308 Ark. 536 , 826 S.W.2d 231 (1992); DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 , 815 S.W.2d 942 (1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cathey v. State
green
2 sentences2005See Doss, 351 Ark. 667 , 97 S.W.3d 413 ; Cathey, 351 Ark. 464 , 95 S.W.3d 753 . 2005See Doss, 351 Ark. 667 , 97 S.W.3d 413 ; Cathey, 351 Ark. 464 , 95 S.W.3d 753 . | 2 | 2004–2005 |
Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Garner
neutral
1 sentence2007App. 226 , 125 S.W.3d 844 (2003), we believe that WSS’s argument is procedurally barred because, at trial, WSS did not move for a directed verdict. 2 Where there has been a trial by jury, the failure of a party to move for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence because of insufficiency of the evidence will constitute a waiver of any question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Lee
green
2 sentences2005Lee, 348 Ark. 707 , 74 S.W.3d 634 . 2005Lee, 348 Ark. 707 , 74 S.W.3d 634 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Grady v. State
green
2 sentences2004See Doss, 351 Ark. 667 , 97 S.W.3d 413 ; Cathey, 351 Ark. 464 , 95 S.W.3d 753 ; Grady, 350 Ark. 160 , 85 S.W.3d 531 . 2004See Doss, 351 Ark. 667 , 97 S.W.3d 413 ; Cathey, 351 Ark. 464 , 95 S.W.3d 753 ; Grady, 350 Ark. 160 , 85 S.W.3d 531 . | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Mikel v. Hubbard
green
2 sentences2003Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 50(e) (2000) provides that “when there has been a trial by jury, the failure of a party to move for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence, because of insufficiency of the evidence will constitute a waiver of any question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict.” In Mikel v. Hubbard, 317 Ark. 125 , 876 S.W.2d 558 (1994), plaintiff Doris Mikel had filed a suit in ejectment against defendant Hubbard Marine Services, Inc., and the jury returned a general verdict for the defendant. 2003Arkansas Rule of Civil Procedure 50(e) (2000) provides that “when there has been a trial by jury, the failure of a party to move for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence, because of insufficiency of the evidence will constitute a waiver of any question pertaining to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict.” In Mikel v. Hubbard, 317 Ark. 125 , 876 S.W.2d 558 (1994), plaintiff Doris Mikel had filed a suit in ejectment against defendant Hubbard Marine Services, Inc., and the jury returned a general verdict for the defendant. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Proctor v. State
green
2 sentences2002Proctor v. State, 349 Ark. 648 , 79 S.W.3d 370 (2002). 2002Proctor v. State, 349 Ark. 648 , 79 S.W.3d 370 (2002). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Brooks v. State
green
2 sentences1995(Emphasis ours.) See also Penn v. State, 319 Ark. 739 , 894 S.W.2d 597 (1995); Brooks v. State, 308 Ark. 660 , 827 S.W.2d 119 (1992); Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991). 1995(Emphasis ours.) See also Penn v. State, 319 Ark. 739 , 894 S.W.2d 597 (1995); Brooks v. State, 308 Ark. 660 , 827 S.W.2d 119 (1992); Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ferrell v. State
green
2 sentences1995(Emphasis ours.) See also Penn v. State, 319 Ark. 739 , 894 S.W.2d 597 (1995); Brooks v. State, 308 Ark. 660 , 827 S.W.2d 119 (1992); Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991). 1995(Emphasis ours.) See also Penn v. State, 319 Ark. 739 , 894 S.W.2d 597 (1995); Brooks v. State, 308 Ark. 660 , 827 S.W.2d 119 (1992); Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Penn v. State
neutral
2 sentences1995(Emphasis ours.) See also Penn v. State, 319 Ark. 739 , 894 S.W.2d 597 (1995); Brooks v. State, 308 Ark. 660 , 827 S.W.2d 119 (1992); Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991). 1995(Emphasis ours.) See also Penn v. State, 319 Ark. 739 , 894 S.W.2d 597 (1995); Brooks v. State, 308 Ark. 660 , 827 S.W.2d 119 (1992); Ferrell v. State, 305 Ark. 511 , 810 S.W.2d 29 (1991). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Collins v. State
green
2 sentences1994See Hayes v. State, 312 Ark. 349 , 849 S.W.2d 501 (1993); Collins v. State, 308 Ark. 536 , 826 S.W.2d 231 (1992); DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 , 815 S.W.2d 942 (1991). 1994See Hayes v. State, 312 Ark. 349 , 849 S.W.2d 501 (1993); Collins v. State, 308 Ark. 536 , 826 S.W.2d 231 (1992); DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 , 815 S.W.2d 942 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
DeWitt v. State
green
2 sentences1994See Hayes v. State, 312 Ark. 349 , 849 S.W.2d 501 (1993); Collins v. State, 308 Ark. 536 , 826 S.W.2d 231 (1992); DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 , 815 S.W.2d 942 (1991). 1994See Hayes v. State, 312 Ark. 349 , 849 S.W.2d 501 (1993); Collins v. State, 308 Ark. 536 , 826 S.W.2d 231 (1992); DeWitt v. State, 306 Ark. 559 , 815 S.W.2d 942 (1991). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Igwe v. State
green
2 sentences1993In Igwe v. State, 312 Ark. 220 , 849 S.W.2d 462 (1993), the Arkansas Supreme Court held there is no authority for applying the requirement of Rule 36.21 in a non-jury situation and cited several cases of this court in which we held the rule does not apply in non-jury situations. 1993In Igwe v. State, 312 Ark. 220 , 849 S.W.2d 462 (1993), the Arkansas Supreme Court held there is no authority for applying the requirement of Rule 36.21 in a non-jury situation and cited several cases of this court in which we held the rule does not apply in non-jury situations. | 1 | 1993–1993 |