pre-election challenge (Arkansas) · Go Syfert
← Arkansas issues

pre-election challenge in Arkansas

10 Arkansas opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2015 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Zolliecoffer v. Postgreen
ark · 2007 · cited in 5 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2014–2015
2 sentences

2014See Zolliecoffer v. Post, 371 Ark. 263 , 265 S.W.3d 114 (2007); Pederson, 354 Ark. 716 , 128 S.W.3d 818 . 8 Cite as 2014 Ark. ___ Here, there is no question that when Hulse filed her petition for declaratory relief and writ of mandamus, she was initiating a proper pre-election challenge to Bailey’s qualification to stand for the office of circuit judge.

2014See Zolliecoffer v. Post, 371 Ark. 263 , 265 S.W.3d 114 (2007); Pederson, 354 Ark. 716 , 128 S.W.3d 818 . 8 Cite as 2014 Ark. ___ Here, there is no question that when Hulse filed her petition for declaratory relief and writ of mandamus, she was initiating a proper pre-election challenge to Bailey’s qualification to stand for the office of circuit judge.

35
Tumey v. Danielsgreen
ark · 2004 · cited in 3 Arkansas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2014
2 sentences

2014Fite, 2011 Ark. 188 ; Tumey, 359 Ark. 256 , 196 S.W.3d 479 .

2014Fite, 2011 Ark. 188 ; Tumey, 359 Ark. 256 , 196 S.W.3d 479 .

13

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Plugge Ex Rel. Arkansas for Representative Democracy v. McCuen green
ark · 1992
2 sentences

2000In Plugge v. McCuen, 310 Ark. 654 , 841 S.W.2d 139 (1992), we declined to decide a constitutional challenge to a proposed constitutional amendment before the election had occurred on the ground that this court cannot issue advisory opinions.

2000In Plugge v. McCuen, 310 Ark. 654 , 841 S.W.2d 139 (1992), we declined to decide a constitutional challenge to a proposed constitutional amendment before the election had occurred on the ground that this court cannot issue advisory opinions.

31994–2000
Pederson v. Stracener green
ark · 2003
2 sentences

2014See Zolliecoffer v. Post, 371 Ark. 263 , 265 S.W.3d 114 (2007); Pederson, 354 Ark. 716 , 128 S.W.3d 818 . 8 Cite as 2014 Ark. ___ Here, there is no question that when Hulse filed her petition for declaratory relief and writ of mandamus, she was initiating a proper pre-election challenge to Bailey’s qualification to stand for the office of circuit judge.

2014See Zolliecoffer v. Post, 371 Ark. 263 , 265 S.W.3d 114 (2007); Pederson, 354 Ark. 716 , 128 S.W.3d 818 . 8 Cite as 2014 Ark. ___ Here, there is no question that when Hulse filed her petition for declaratory relief and writ of mandamus, she was initiating a proper pre-election challenge to Bailey’s qualification to stand for the office of circuit judge.

22014–2014
Williams v. Martin neutral
ark · 2014
1 sentence

2014Cite as 2014 Ark. 210 JIM HANNAH, Chief Justice This appeal arises from a pre-election challenge to the eligibility of a candidate for the non-partisan judicial election on May 20, 2014, and a challenge to the constitutionality of Rule VII(C) of the Arkansas Supreme Court Rules Governing Admission to the Bar.

12014–2014
Bailey v. Martin green
ark · 2014
1 sentence

2014See Zolliecoffer v. Post, 371 Ark. 263 , 265 S.W.3d 114 (2007); Pederson, 354 Ark. 716 , 128 S.W.3d 818 . 8 Cite as 2014 Ark. 213 Here, there is no question that when Hulse filed her petition for declaratory relief and writ of mandamus, she was initiating a proper pre-election challenge to Bailey’s qualification to stand for the office of circuit judge.

12014–2014
State ex rel. Robinson v. Craighead County Board of Election Commissioners green
ark · 1989
2 sentences

2008E.g., Tumey v. Daniels , 359 Ark. 256 , 260 , 196 S.W.3d 479 , 482 (2004) ("Section 7-5-207 (b) provides a means for a voter to raise a pre-election attack. . . ."); State v. Craighead County Bd. of Election Commrs ., 300 Ark. 405 , 411 , 779 S.W.2d 169 , 172 (1989).

2008E.g., Tumey v. Daniels , 359 Ark. 256 , 260 , 196 S.W.3d 479 , 482 (2004) ("Section 7-5-207 (b) provides a means for a voter to raise a pre-election attack. . . ."); State v. Craighead County Bd. of Election Commrs ., 300 Ark. 405 , 411 , 779 S.W.2d 169 , 172 (1989).

12008–2008

Statutes the citing opinions construe

AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 16 (5) AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 7-5-207 (5) AR § Ark. Code Ann. § 17 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MO 13 (1981–2025) AR 10 (1994–2015) MT 5 (1986–2022) FL 4 (1983–2017) OR 4 (1993–2024) GA 4 (2009–2025) WA 3 (2006–2018) ID 2 (1999–2024) MS 2 (2010–2011) NV 2 (2002–2006) IN 2 (2019–2025) KY 2 (1973–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check