10 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2001–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Alexandergreen2 sentences2007In re Marriage of Alexander, 368 Ill. 2007In re Marriage of Alexander, 368 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Harris v. Cropmate Companygreen2 sentences2002App. 3d at 372 , 706 N.E.2d at 62 (“If the scientific evidence is not ‘novel,’ then the Frye admissibility standard has been satisfied ***”); see also State v. Russell, 125 Wash. 2d 24, 70 , 882 P.2d 747, 776 (1994) (holding that the Frye standard did not apply where computer programs listing various characteristics of homicides were “nothing more than sophisticated record-keeping systems”). 2002App. 3d at 372 , 706 N.E.2d at 62 ("If the scientific evidence is not 'novel,' then the Frye admissibility standard has been satisfied ***"); see also State v. Russell , 125 Wash. 2d 24, 70 , 882 P.2d 747, 776 (1994) (holding that the Frye standard did not apply where computer programs listing various characteristics of homicides were "nothing more than sophisticated record-keeping systems"). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Russellgreen2 sentences2002App. 3d at 372 , 706 N.E.2d at 62 (“If the scientific evidence is not ‘novel,’ then the Frye admissibility standard has been satisfied ***”); see also State v. Russell, 125 Wash. 2d 24, 70 , 882 P.2d 747, 776 (1994) (holding that the Frye standard did not apply where computer programs listing various characteristics of homicides were “nothing more than sophisticated record-keeping systems”). 2002App. 3d at 372 , 706 N.E.2d at 62 (“If the scientific evidence is not ‘novel,’ then the Frye admissibility standard has been satisfied ***”); see also State v. Russell, 125 Wash. 2d 24, 70 , 882 P.2d 747, 776 (1994) (holding that the Frye standard did not apply where computer programs listing various characteristics of homicides were “nothing more than sophisticated record-keeping systems”). | 2 | 2 |
People v. Harrisgreen1 sentence2013Cf. People v. Harris, 314 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Luna
green
2 sentences2015But the Illinois Supreme Court has "reiterate[d] that a Frye admissibility challenge is not the proper vehicle to question the conclusions an examiner reaches in a particular case." People v. Luna, 2013 IL App (1st) 072253, ¶ 72 . 2015But the Illinois Supreme Court has "reiterate[d] that a Frye admissibility challenge is not the proper vehicle to question the conclusions an examiner reaches in a particular case." People v. Luna, 2013 IL App (1st) 072253, ¶ 72 . | 3 | 2015–2015 |
Donaldson v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.
green
2 sentences2013Before the jury, the examining attorney “may expose shaky but admissible evidence by vigorous cross- examination or the presentation of contrary evidence.” Donaldson, 199 Ill. 2d at 88 . 2002This process is simply not the sort of method “new to science that undeservedly create[s] a perception of certainty when the basis for the evidence or opinion is actually invalid” (Donaldson, 199 Ill. 2d at 78 , 767 N.E.2d at 324 ). | 3 | 2002–2013 |
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Although Illinois has not adopted the standard for admission of scientific testimony articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 125 L. 2001Although Illinois has not adopted the standard for admission of scientific testimony articulated in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 , 125 L. | 2 | 2001–2001 |