10 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1995–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Riosgreen2 sentences2024The fifth district has found that defendants who fall into the second category have two options: They may either “file a motion seeking a hearing to have their pretrial conditions reviewed anew” under the Act’s amendments to the Code or they “may elect to stay in detention until such time as the previously set monetary security may be paid.” People v. Rios, 2023 IL App (5th) 230724, ¶ 16 . ¶ 21 In this case, Mr. Cottrell chose the first option by filing a motion seeking a hearing to have his pretrial conditions reviewed anew under the Act. 2024See People v. Rios, 2023 IL App (5th) 230724, ¶ 16 (noting that “[u]nder sections 110-7.5(b) and 110-5(e), a defendant may file a motion seeking a hearing to have [his] pretrial conditions reviewed anew”). | 3 | 6 |
Frye v. United Statesred2 sentences2014The trial court denied the motion, ruling the statements were admissible as dying declarations and not testimonial. ¶6 Defendant also filed a motion seeking a hearing on the admissibility of the State’s -2- proposed use of toolmark and firearms identification evidence pursuant to Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. 2013The trial court denied the motion, ruling the statements were admissible as dying declarations and not testimonial. ¶6 Defendant also filed a motion seeking a hearing on the admissibility of the State's proposed use of toolmark and firearms identification evidence pursuant to Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013, 1014 (D.C. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Fakes v. Eloy
green
1 sentence2020Fakes v. Eloy, 2014 IL App (4th) 121100, ¶ 82 , 8 N.E.3d 93 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Keith
green
2 sentences1995In People v. Keith (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 32 , 591 N.E.2d 449 , defendant filed a motion seeking to bar results of a breath-alcohol test from evidence at his trial. 1995In People v. Keith (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 32 , 591 N.E.2d 449 , defendant filed a motion seeking to bar results of a breath-alcohol test from evidence at his trial. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.