10 Maryland opinions name it 3 courts 1998–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Holiday Universal, Inc. v. Montgomery Countygreen2 sentences2022On a number of occasions, we have pointed out that Article XI-A, which we commonly refer to as the Home Rule Amendment, enabled Baltimore City and counties “which chose to adopt a home rule charter, to achieve a significant degree of political self-determination.” Piscatelli v. Bd. of Liquor License Comm’rs, 378 Md. 623, 633 (2003) (quoting Holiday Universal, Inc. v. Montgomery Cty., 377 Md. 305, 313 (2003)) (additional quotations omitted). 2022On a number of occasions, we have pointed out that Article XI-A, which we commonly refer to as the Home Rule Amendment, enabled Baltimore City and counties “which chose to adopt a home rule charter, to achieve a significant degree of political self-determination.” Piscatelli v. Bd. of Liquor License Comm’rs, 378 Md. 623, 633 (2003) (quoting Holiday Universal, Inc. v. Montgomery Cty., 377 Md. 305, 313 (2003)) (additional quotations omitted). | 4 | 4 |
Tyma v. Montgomery Countygreen2 sentences2009As we have pointed out on numerous occasions, Article XI-A enabled Baltimore City and counties " ‘which chose to adopt a home rule charter, to achieve a significant degree of political self-determination.’ ” Holiday Universal v. Montgomery County, 377 Md. 305, 313 , 833 A.2d 518, 523 (2003), quoting Tyma v. Montgomery County, 369 Md. 497, 504 , 801 A.2d 148, 152 (2002). 2009As we have pointed out on numerous occasions, Article XI-A enabled Baltimore City and counties " ‘which chose to adopt a home rule charter, to achieve a significant degree of political self-determination.’ ” Holiday Universal v. Montgomery County, 377 Md. 305, 313 , 833 A.2d 518, 523 (2003), quoting Tyma v. Montgomery County, 369 Md. 497, 504 , 801 A.2d 148, 152 (2002). | 3 | 3 |
Piscatelli v. Board of Liquor License Commissionersgreen2 sentences2009Eldridge, writing for this Court, in Piscatelli, 378 Md. at 633-34 , 837 A.2d at 937 -38: Baltimore City is a charter home rule jurisdiction under Article XI-A of the Maryland Constitution. 2009Eldridge, writing for this Court, in Piscatelli, 378 Md. at 633-34 , 837 A.2d at 937 -38: Baltimore City is a charter home rule jurisdiction under Article XI-A of the Maryland Constitution. | 2 | 3 |
McCrory Corp. v. Fowlerred2 sentences2003See Tyma v. Montgomery County, 369 Md. 497, 504 , 801 A.2d 148, 152 (2002); McCrory Corp. v. Fowler, 319 Md. 12, 16 , 570 A.2d 834, 835 (1990); Montgomery Citizens League v. Greenhalgk, 253 Md. 151, 155-162 , 252 A.2d 242, 245-247 (1969). 2003See Tyma v. Montgomery County, 369 Md. 497, 504 , 801 A.2d 148, 152 (2002); McCrory Corp. v. Fowler, 319 Md. 12, 16 , 570 A.2d 834, 835 (1990); Montgomery Citizens League v. Greenhalgk, 253 Md. 151, 155-162 , 252 A.2d 242, 245-247 (1969). | 1 | 2 |
Reynolds v. Simsgreen2 sentences2004One-Vote This Court has consistently enunciated the rule that “the Equal Protection Clause requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.” In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 379 , 805 A.2d 292 , 332 n. 38 (2002) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 577 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1390 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 546 (1964)); DuBois v. College Park, 286 Md. 677, 684-85 , 410 A.2d 577, 582-83 (1980). 2004One-Vote This Court has consistently enunciated the rule that “the Equal Protection Clause requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.” In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 379 , 805 A.2d 292 , 332 n. 38 (2002) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 577 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1390 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 546 (1964)); DuBois v. College Park, 286 Md. 677, 684-85 , 410 A.2d 577, 582-83 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
DuBois v. City of College Parkgreen2 sentences2004One-Vote This Court has consistently enunciated the rule that “the Equal Protection Clause requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.” In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 379 , 805 A.2d 292 , 332 n. 38 (2002) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 577 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1390 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 546 (1964)); DuBois v. College Park, 286 Md. 677, 684-85 , 410 A.2d 577, 582-83 (1980). 2004One-Vote This Court has consistently enunciated the rule that “the Equal Protection Clause requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.” In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 379 , 805 A.2d 292 , 332 n. 38 (2002) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 577 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1390 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 546 (1964)); DuBois v. College Park, 286 Md. 677, 684-85 , 410 A.2d 577, 582-83 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
Montgomery Citizens League v. Greenhalghgreen2 sentences2003See Tyma v. Montgomery County, 369 Md. 497, 504 , 801 A.2d 148, 152 (2002); McCrory Corp. v. Fowler, 319 Md. 12, 16 , 570 A.2d 834, 835 (1990); Montgomery Citizens League v. Greenhalgk, 253 Md. 151, 155-162 , 252 A.2d 242, 245-247 (1969). 2003See Tyma v. Montgomery County, 369 Md. 497, 504 , 801 A.2d 148, 152 (2002); McCrory Corp. v. Fowler, 319 Md. 12, 16 , 570 A.2d 834, 835 (1990); Montgomery Citizens League v. Greenhalgk, 253 Md. 151, 155-162 , 252 A.2d 242, 245-247 (1969). | 1 | 1 |
Beretta U.S.A. Corp. v. Santosgreen2 sentences1998Section 5 of the Express Powers Act recognizes the authority of a charter home rule county and Baltimore City to enact local ordinances to maintain “the peace, good government, health and welfare *380 of the county,” Md.Code, Art. 25A, § 5(S), and gives charter counties and Baltimore City “a wide array of legislative and administrative powers over local affairs.” Ritchmount, 283 Md. at 57 , 388 A.2d 523 ; see also Beretta, 122 Md.App. at 186 , 712 A.2d 69 . 1998Section 5 of the Express Powers Act recognizes the authority of a charter home rule county and Baltimore City to enact local ordinances to maintain “the peace, good government, health and welfare *380 of the county,” Md.Code, Art. 25A, § 5(S), and gives charter counties and Baltimore City “a wide array of legislative and administrative powers over local affairs.” Ritchmount, 283 Md. at 57 , 388 A.2d 523 ; see also Beretta, 122 Md.App. at 186 , 712 A.2d 69 . | 1 | 1 |
Holiday Point Marina Partners v. Anne Arundel Countygreen1 sentence1998See Holiday Point, 849 Md. at 198, 707 A.2d 829 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Legislative Districting of the State
green
2 sentences2004One-Vote This Court has consistently enunciated the rule that “the Equal Protection Clause requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.” In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 379 , 805 A.2d 292 , 332 n. 38 (2002) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 577 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1390 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 546 (1964)); DuBois v. College Park, 286 Md. 677, 684-85 , 410 A.2d 577, 582-83 (1980). 2004One-Vote This Court has consistently enunciated the rule that “the Equal Protection Clause requires that a State make an honest and good faith effort to construct districts, in both houses of its legislature, as nearly of equal population as is practicable.” In re Legislative Districting of the State, 370 Md. 312, 379 , 805 A.2d 292 , 332 n. 38 (2002) (quoting Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 577 , 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1390 , 12 L.Ed.2d 506, 546 (1964)); DuBois v. College Park, 286 Md. 677, 684-85 , 410 A.2d 577, 582-83 (1980). | 1 | 2004–2004 |
Mont. Cty. Bd. of Realtors v. Mont. Cty.
green
2 sentences1999Montgomery County Board of Realtors v. Montgomery County , 287 Md. 101 , 106-07 , 411 A.2d 97 (1980); Eastern Diversified Properties, 319 Md. at 49 -50 . 1999Montgomery County Board of Realtors v. Montgomery County , 287 Md. 101 , 106-07 , 411 A.2d 97 (1980); Eastern Diversified Properties, 319 Md. at 49 -50 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Eastern Diversified Properties, Inc. v. Montgomery County
green
1 sentence1999Montgomery County Board of Realtors v. Montgomery County , 287 Md. 101 , 106-07 , 411 A.2d 97 (1980); Eastern Diversified Properties, 319 Md. at 49 -50 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Prince George's County v. Board of Supervisors of Elections
green
2 sentences1998II Authority to Fill Vacancies by Election In Prince George's County v. Board of Supervisors of Elections , 337 Md. 496 , 654 A.2d 1303 (1994), the Court of Appeals considered whether a charter home rule county could provide in its charter for filling council vacancies by special election. 1998II Authority to Fill Vacancies by Election In Prince George's County v. Board of Supervisors of Elections , 337 Md. 496 , 654 A.2d 1303 (1994), the Court of Appeals considered whether a charter home rule county could provide in its charter for filling council vacancies by special election. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Ritchmount Partnership v. Board of Supervisors of Elections
green
2 sentences1998Section 5 of the Express Powers Act recognizes the authority of a charter home rule county and Baltimore City to enact local ordinances to maintain “the peace, good government, health and welfare *380 of the county,” Md.Code, Art. 25A, § 5(S), and gives charter counties and Baltimore City “a wide array of legislative and administrative powers over local affairs.” Ritchmount, 283 Md. at 57 , 388 A.2d 523 ; see also Beretta, 122 Md.App. at 186 , 712 A.2d 69 . 1998Section 5 of the Express Powers Act recognizes the authority of a charter home rule county and Baltimore City to enact local ordinances to maintain “the peace, good government, health and welfare *380 of the county,” Md.Code, Art. 25A, § 5(S), and gives charter counties and Baltimore City “a wide array of legislative and administrative powers over local affairs.” Ritchmount, 283 Md. at 57 , 388 A.2d 523 ; see also Beretta, 122 Md.App. at 186 , 712 A.2d 69 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |