10 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Federal Insurance Company v. The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection And Insurance Companygreen2 sentences2021See also Fed Ins Co, an Indiana Corp v Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins Co, 415 F3d 487, 494-495 (CA 6, 2005) (applying Michigan law and holding that the plaintiff was “not a volunteer, and its claim for equitable subrogation may proceed” because, at the time each payment was made, the plaintiff was “ignorant of the ‘real state of facts’ ” and “ ‘under an erroneous impression’ that it had a legal duty to compensate” another party under an insurance policy provision). 31 MCL 500.3114(1) and (4)(a) through (b), as amended by 2002 PA 38 , effective March 7, 2002. 10 A person entitled to cla 2021See also Fed Ins Co, an Indiana Corp v Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins Co, 415 F3d 487, 494-495 (CA 6, 2005) (applying Michigan law and holding that the plaintiff was “not a volunteer, and its claim for equitable subrogation may proceed” because, at the time each payment was made, the plaintiff was “ignorant of the ‘real state of facts’ ” and “ ‘under an erroneous impression’ that it had a legal duty to compensate” another party under an insurance policy provision). 31 MCL 500.3114(1) and (4)(a) through (b), as amended by 2002 PA 38 , effective March 7, 2002. 10 A person entitled to cla | 2 | 2 |
W a Foote Memorial Hospital v. Michigan Assigned Claims Plangreen2 sentences2019See also WA Foote Mem Hosp v Mich Assigned Claims Plan, 321 Mich App 159, 170 ; 909 NW2d 38 (2017). 2019See also WA Foote Mem Hosp v Mich Assigned Claims Plan, 321 Mich App 159, 170 ; 909 NW2d 38 (2017). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Allstate Insurance Co v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co
green
2 sentences2022Allstate Ins Co v State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co, 321 Mich App 543, 558-559 ; 909 NW2d 495 (2017). 2022Allstate Ins Co v State Farm Mut Auto Ins Co, 321 Mich App 543, 558-559 ; 909 NW2d 495 (2017). | 2 | 2019–2022 |
Allen v. Farm Bureau Insurance
green
2 sentences2017In that case, unpaid benefits due or coming due may be collected under the assigned claims plan and the insurer to which the claim is assigned is entitled to reimbursement from the defaulting insurers to the extent of their financial responsibility. [Emphasis added.] In Allen v Farm Bureau Ins Co, 210 Mich App 593 , 597; 534 NW2d 177 (1995), this court read the emphasized statutory language as the source of an assigned claims insurer’s “statutorily created right to reimbursement . . . .” But the emphasized language plainly refers to the situation where a no-fault insurer is unable to provide P 2016In that case, unpaid benefits due or coming due are subject to being collected under the assigned claims plan, and the insurer to which the claim is assigned . . . is entitled to reimbursement from the defaulting insurers to the extent of their financial responsibility.” [Allen, 210 Mich App at 596-597 , quoting MCL 500.3172(1) (emphasis added).] -3- Mut Auto Ins Co, 222 Mich App 97 ; 564 NW2d 65 (1997). | 2 | 2016–2017 |
Berger v. Berger
green
2 sentences2025Berger v Berger, 277 Mich App 700, 712 ; 747 NW2d 336 (2008). -12- (b) No personal protection insurance applicable to the injury can be identified. [Emphasis added.] Accordingly, the trial court’s decision to grant summary disposition in favor of the MAIPF was not erroneous given that on remand both of the potential outcomes would preclude liability on the part of the MAIPF. 2025Berger v Berger, 277 Mich App 700, 712 ; 747 NW2d 336 (2008). -12- (b) No personal protection insurance applicable to the injury can be identified. [Emphasis added.] Accordingly, the trial court’s decision to grant summary disposition in favor of the MAIPF was not erroneous given that on remand both of the potential outcomes would preclude liability on the part of the MAIPF. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Titan Insurance v. American Country Insurance
green
1 sentence2024Under MCL 500.3172(1): A person entitled to claim because of accidental bodily injury arising out of the ownership, operation, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle as a motor vehicle in this state may claim personal protection insurance benefits through the assigned claims plan if any of the following apply: (a) No personal protection insurance is applicable to the injury. (b) No personal protection insurance applicable to the injury can be identified. (c) No personal protection insurance applicable to the injury can be ascertained because of a dispute between 2 or more automobile insurers c | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Grange Insurance Co of Michigan v. Edward Lawrence
green
1 sentence2023MCL 500.3172(1) states: (1) A person entitled to claim because of accidental bodily injury arising out of the ownership, operation, maintenance, or use of a motor vehicle as a motor vehicle in -4- this state may claim personal protection insurance benefits through the assigned claims plan if any of the following apply: (a) No personal protection insurance is applicable to the injury. (b) No personal protection insurance applicable to the injury can be identified. (c) No personal protection insurance applicable to the injury can be ascertained because of a dispute between 2 or more automobile i | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Amerisure Companies v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
green
2 sentences2016In that case, unpaid benefits due or coming due are subject to being collected under the assigned claims plan, and the insurer to which the claim is assigned . . . is entitled to reimbursement from the defaulting insurers to the extent of their financial responsibility.” [Allen, 210 Mich App at 596-597 , quoting MCL 500.3172(1) (emphasis added).] -3- Mut Auto Ins Co, 222 Mich App 97 ; 564 NW2d 65 (1997). 2016In that case, unpaid benefits due or coming due are subject to being collected under the assigned claims plan, and the insurer to which the claim is assigned . . . is entitled to reimbursement from the defaulting insurers to the extent of their financial responsibility.” [Allen, 210 Mich App at 596-597 , quoting MCL 500.3172(1) (emphasis added).] -3- Mut Auto Ins Co, 222 Mich App 97 ; 564 NW2d 65 (1997). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.