agency constitutes error in North Carolina

10 North Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1992–2002 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
Brooks v. Rebarco, Inc.green ncctapp · 1988 · cited in 9 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1992–2002 2 sentences 1999App. 459, 464 , 372 S.E.2d 342, 345 (1988) (“[ijncor-rect statutory interpretation by an agency constitutes an error of law under G.S. 150B-51(b) and allows [appellate] court to apply a de novo review”). 1998Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C.App. 668, 674 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 118 (1994) ("If [petitioner] argues the agency's decision was based on an error of law, then `de novo ` review is required."); Brooks, Com'r of Labor v. Rebarco, Inc., 91 N.C.App. 459, 464 , 372 S.E.2d 342, 345 (1988) ("Incorrect statutory interpretation by an agency constitutes an error of law...."). "[W]here the initial reviewing court should have conducted de novo review, this Court will directly review the [agency's] decision under a de novo review standard." Amanini , 114 N.C.App. at 677 , 443 S.E.2d at 119 ; Brooks, Comr.	6	9
Brooks v. McWhirter Grading Co., Inc.green nc · 1981 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C.App. 668, 674 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 118 (1994) ("If [petitioner] argues the agency's decision was based on an error of law, then `de novo ` review is required."); Brooks, Com'r of Labor v. Rebarco, Inc., 91 N.C.App. 459, 464 , 372 S.E.2d 342, 345 (1988) ("Incorrect statutory interpretation by an agency constitutes an error of law...."). "[W]here the initial reviewing court should have conducted de novo review, this Court will directly review the [agency's] decision under a de novo review standard." Amanini , 114 N.C.App. at 677 , 443 S.E.2d at 119 ; Brooks, Comr. 1998App. at 677 , 443 S.E.2d at 119 ; Brooks, Comr. of Labor v. Grading Co., 303 N.C. 573, 580-81 , 281 S.E.2d 24, 29 (1981) (“When the issue on appeal is wheth- • er a state agency erred in interpreting a statutory term, an appellate court may freely substitute its judgment for that of the agency and employ de novo review.”).	1	1
Amanini v. N.C. Department of Human Resourcesgreen ncctapp · 1994 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 2 sentences 1998Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C.App. 668, 674 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 118 (1994) ("If [petitioner] argues the agency's decision was based on an error of law, then `de novo ` review is required."); Brooks, Com'r of Labor v. Rebarco, Inc., 91 N.C.App. 459, 464 , 372 S.E.2d 342, 345 (1988) ("Incorrect statutory interpretation by an agency constitutes an error of law...."). "[W]here the initial reviewing court should have conducted de novo review, this Court will directly review the [agency's] decision under a de novo review standard." Amanini , 114 N.C.App. at 677 , 443 S.E.2d at 119 ; Brooks, Comr. 1998Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C.App. 668, 674 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 118 (1994) ("If [petitioner] argues the agency's decision was based on an error of law, then `de novo ` review is required."); Brooks, Com'r of Labor v. Rebarco, Inc., 91 N.C.App. 459, 464 , 372 S.E.2d 342, 345 (1988) ("Incorrect statutory interpretation by an agency constitutes an error of law...."). "[W]here the initial reviewing court should have conducted de novo review, this Court will directly review the [agency's] decision under a de novo review standard." Amanini , 114 N.C.App. at 677 , 443 S.E.2d at 119 ; Brooks, Comr.	1	1
JWA v. State of Ga.green gactapp · 1974 · cited in 1 North Carolina opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 1 sentence 1998Dept. of Human Resources, 114 N.C.App. 668, 674 , 443 S.E.2d 114, 118 (1994) ("If [petitioner] argues the agency's decision was based on an error of law, then `de novo ` review is required."); Brooks, Com'r of Labor v. Rebarco, Inc., 91 N.C.App. 459, 464 , 372 S.E.2d 342, 345 (1988) ("Incorrect statutory interpretation by an agency constitutes an error of law...."). "[W]here the initial reviewing court should have conducted de novo review, this Court will directly review the [agency's] decision under a de novo review standard." Amanini , 114 N.C.App. at 677 , 443 S.E.2d at 119 ; Brooks, Comr.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

Case	Cited	Years
Matter of McCrary green ncctapp · 1993 1 sentence 1994McCrary, 112 N.C.	1	1994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-51 (7) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-1 (3) NC § N.C. Gen. Stat. § 150B-52 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NC 10 (1992–2002) NY 2 (1983–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check